Case law
Opinions from 1658 to today.
10,000+ results
1.33s
142 A.D.2d 659 · Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · Jul 18, 1988
In 1953, the defendant Romano’s predecessor in title petitioned the Village Zoning Board of Appeals for permission to continue the conversion of the building to a residence, or in the alternative, for a determination that … The Board of Appeals denied the application, finding that the building was a boathouse, that the contemplated construction had not been ongoing as of the date of the enactment of the Village Zoning Ordinance, and that the
Cited 0 timesPublished225 A.D.2d 537 · Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · Mar 4, 1996
Cited 0 timesPublished135 A.D.2d 773 · Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · Dec 28, 1987
Cited 0 timesPublishedBraunstein v. Board of Zoning Appeals
100 A.D.3d 1091 · Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · Nov 1, 2012
Board of Appeals of Town of Hempstead, 2 NY3d 608, 612-613 [2004]; Matter of Mary T. … of Pecoraro v Board of Appeals of Town of Hempstead, 2 NY3d at 613 ).
Cited 4 timesPublished226 A.D.2d 362 · Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · Apr 1, 1996
The plaintiffs made a prima facie showing that the defendants violated Labor Law § 240 (1), and that such violation was a contributing cause of the injured plaintiff’s injuries (see, Zimmer v Chemung County Performing Arts … This is insufficient to raise a triable issue of fact (see, Figueroa v Manhattanville Coll., 193 AD2d 778 ; Walsh v Baker, 172 AD2d 1038 ). Mangano, P. J., Thompson, Friedmann, Florio and McGinity, JJ., concur.
Cited 1 timesPublishedLavere v. Board of Zoning Appeals
39 A.D.2d 639 · Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · Apr 19, 1972
Daub v. Popkin, 5 A D 2d 283, affd. 4 N Y 2d 1024). The Supreme Court of Pennsylvania has held similarly in Nicholson v. Zoning Board of Adjustment ( 392 Pa. 278 ) and Richman v. … Philadelphia Zoning Board of Adjustment ( 391 Pa. 254 ).
Cited 5 timesPublishedHolmes v. Brookhaven Town Planning Board
137 A.D.2d 601 · Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · Feb 8, 1988
In a proceeding pursuant to CPLR article 78 to review a determination of the respondent Planning Board of the Town of Brookhaven (hereinafter the Board), dated October 20, 1986, which approved a site development plan submitted … On that same day the Board again voted to approve the site plan for the project.
Cited 20 timesPublished72 A.D.2d 885 · Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · Nov 21, 1979
Proceeding pursuant to CPLR article 78 (transferred to this court by order of the Supreme Court at Special Term, entered in Washington County) to review a determination of the Board of Education of Bolton Central School, … School Dist., 45 NY2d 279 ; Matter of Pell v Board of Educ., 34 NY2d 222 ).
Cited 2 timesPublishedBerchielli v. Zoning Board of Appeals
202 A.D.2d 733 · Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · Mar 3, 1994
In order to grant approval, the Town’s Planning Board must *734 review the proposed subdivision and insure that any construction is in compliance with any zoning ordinance then in effect (id., at art V, § 5 [A]). … Wallace, 118 AD2d 913 ; Incorporated Vil. of Old Westbury v Alljay Farms, 100 AD2d 574 , mod on other grounds 64 NY2d 798 ).
Cited 10 timesPublished104 A.D.2d 777 · Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · Oct 25, 1984
Cited 0 timesPublished81 A.D.2d 668 · Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · Apr 27, 1981
It has long been the rule that the existence of a vacancy casts no mandatory duty upon a board of education to fill it (Matter of Jaffe v Board of Educ., 265 NY 160 ). … On the facts of this case, the referee properly rejected this argument (see Matter of Mitchell v Board of Educ., 40 NY2d 904 ; Steele v Board of Educ., 40 NY2d 456 ).
Cited 1 timesPublishedFisher v. Suffolk County Board
258 A.D.2d 584 · Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · Jan 13, 1999
Cited 0 timesPublished46 A.D.2d 102 · Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · Dec 5, 1974
(Iannucci v. Board of Supervisors, supra, p. 252.) … (Slater v. Board of Supervisors of County of Cortland, 42 A D 2d 795.)
Cited 4 timesPublishedSpaulding v. American Wood Board Co.
58 A.D. 314 · Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · Jul 1, 1901
(Sprague v. Bartholdi Hotel Co., 68 Hun, 555 .)
Cited 12 timesPublished2 Park Avenue Associates v. Cross & Brown Co.
60 A.D.2d 566 · Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · Dec 27, 1977
The underlying action involves alleged breaches of a management agreement and breach of fiduciary duties by the defendants, including Cross & Brown, the exclusive renting agent of 2 Park Avenue. … Lebenkoff, 10 AD2d 916 ; Wood v Sardi’s Rest Corp., 47 AD2d 870, 871 ).
Cited 1 timesPublished282 A.D. 891 · Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · Oct 21, 1953
Cited 1 timesPublished86 A.D.2d 780 · Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · Jan 29, 1982
Cited 0 timesPublished217 A.D.2d 660 · Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · Jul 24, 1995
Cited 0 timesPublishedMartirano v. Zoning Board of Appeals
87 A.D.2d 820 · Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · Apr 5, 1982
Vil. of Hempstead, 45 NY2d 105, 108 ), a self-created difficulty is a factor which may be considered by a zoning board (Matter of National Merrit v Weist, 41 NY2d 438 ). … Accordingly, we hold that the zoning board’s determination denying the variance was supported by substantial evidence (see Matter of Fuhstv Foley, 45 NY2d 441 , supra; Matter ofEichenbaum v Arred, 72 AD2d 563 ).
Cited 8 timesPublished70 A.D.2d 1058 · Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · Jun 1, 1979
Cited 0 timesPublished
Ask Donna