Case law
Opinions from 1658 to today.
10,000+ results
1.67s
226 A.D. 249 · Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · May 24, 1929
Plaintiff’s judgment against the defendant board of education is predicated upon a breach of contract. … (Sweet v. Morrison, 116 N. Y. 19 ; Neidlinger v. Onward Construction Co., 107 App. Div. 398 ; affd., 188 N. Y. 572.)
Cited 2 timesPublished64 A.D.3d 650 · Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · Jul 14, 2009
Tax Commn. of City of N.Y., 26 NY2d 444, 450 [1970]; Spiegel v Board of Assessors, 161 AD2d 627, 628 [1990]). … Board of Assessors, 64 AD3d 649 [2009] [decided herewith]).
Cited 1 timesPublishedTompkins v. Board of Education
245 A.D.2d 522 · Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · Dec 22, 1997
Board of Educ. 90 NY2d 662 ; Matter of O'Mara v Sachem, Cent. … School Dist., 242 AD2d 634 ; Matter of Chupka v Board of Educ. 240 AD2d 795 ; cf., Matter of Candrea v Board of Educ., 236 AD2d 536 ).
Cited 4 timesPublished262 A.D.2d 321 · Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · Jun 1, 1999
[Barker Teachers Union], 209 AD2d 945 ; Board of Educ. v Depew Teachers Org., 167 AD2d 907 ; Matter of Szumigala v Hicksville Union Free School Dist. … Bd. of Educ., 148 AD2d 621 ; see also, Matter of Smith v Board of Educ., 97 AD2d 795 ).
Cited 6 timesPublished38 A.D.2d 619 · Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · Dec 1, 1971
Apparently, appellant Board of Education was insured by the same insurance carrier. … School Dist., 27 A D 2d 898; see, also, Matter of Johnson v. Board of Educ. of City of Rochester, 33 A D 2d 647).
Cited 5 timesPublished160 A.D.2d 1150 · Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · Apr 19, 1990
Board of Educ., 34 NY2d 222 , 233; Matter of Oare v Coughlin, supra, at 946). … We find no error in the fact that respondent disagreed with the Hearing Officer’s recommended penalty (see, Matter of Crookston v Brown, supra, at 869).
Cited 4 timesPublished2018 NY Slip Op 5770 · Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · Aug 15, 2018
Matter of Ward v Brown ( 2018 NY Slip Op 05770 ) Matter of Ward v Brown 2018 NY Slip Op 05770 Decided on August 15, 2018 Appellate Division, Second Department Published by New York State Law Reporting Bureau pursuant to Judiciary … CONNOLLY LINDA CHRISTOPHER, JJ. 2018-00943 DECISION, ORDER & JUDGMENT [*1]In the Matter of J'Min Ward, petitioner, v Craig Brown, etc., respondent. J'Min Ward, Goshen, NY, petitioner pro se. Barbara D.
Cited 0 timesPublished265 A.D.2d 866 · Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · Oct 1, 1999
Gauer, Sr. to notice and reconvene the Town of Springwater Republican Party Caucus for the purpose of determining the party’s nominee for the office of Town Supervisor and directing respondent Board of Elections of Livingston … Board of Elections, 67 NY2d 634, 636-637 ).
Cited 3 timesPublished23 A.D.2d 812 · Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · Apr 8, 1965
Meyer v. Warden, 269 N. Y. 426 .) In the interest of justice and to avoid the lapse of additional time, we shall consider this proceeding in the nature of habeas corpus.
Cited 0 timesPublished173 A.D.2d 619 · Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · May 20, 1991
New York City, 130 AD2d 128, 134-135 ; Matter of Pfaff v Columbia-Greene Community Coll., 99 AD2d 887 ). … City of New York, 107 AD2d 320, 324 , affd 66 NY2d 859 ; Matter of Fichera v City of New York, 145 AD2d 482, 483 ).
Cited 7 timesPublished60 A.D.3d 851 · Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · Mar 17, 2009
In Board of Educ. of Monroe-Woodbury Cent. … School Dist. v Wieder ( 72 NY2d 174, 188 [1988]), the Court of Appeals held that Education Law § 3602-c neither mandates that all services for children with disabilities be provided on location in public schools, nor contains
Cited 1 timesPublished121 A.D.2d 531 · Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · Jun 16, 1986
The opinion of the medical board of the Teachers’ Retirement System was conclusive (see, Matter of Mondello v Beekman, 78 AD2d 824, affd 56 NY2d 513 ). … the findings of the medical board (see, Matter of Sherrid v Teachers’ Retirement Bd., 112 Misc 2d 6, 7 ).
Cited 4 timesPublished73 A.D.3d 617 · Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · May 25, 2010
Dept., 479 F Supp 1328, 1335 [WD NY 1979], cited with approval in Wavertree Corp. v 136 Waverly Assoc., 258 AD2d 392 [1999]). … Corp., 75 NY2d 530, 537-540 [1990]; Katz v 215 W. 91st St. Corp., 215 AD2d 265 [1995]).
Cited 2 timesPublishedApache Associates v. Planning Board
131 A.D.2d 666 · Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · Jun 15, 1987
The respondent Planning Board of the Village of Nyack denied the petitioner’s application for site plan approval (see, Village Law § 7-725) after a hearing. … Rather, a planning board must make a determination with reference to the specific design and layout factors enumerated in Village Law § 7-725 (see, Moriarity v Planning Bd. of Vil. of Sloatsburg, 119 AD2d 188 , lv denied
Cited 3 timesPublished259 A.D.2d 700 · Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · Mar 22, 1999
In a proceeding pursuant to CPLR article 78 to review a determination of the Board of Education of the City School District of the City of New York which terminated the New York City teaching licenses of Jennifer Jones, Brenda … Board of Educ., 236 AD2d 403 ).
Cited 4 timesPublished2018 NY Slip Op 5396 · Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · Jul 19, 2018
Matter of Brown v Stanford ( 2018 NY Slip Op 05396 ) Matter of Brown v Stanford 2018 NY Slip Op 05396 Decided on July 19, 2018 Appellate Division, Third Department Published by New York State Law Reporting Bureau pursuant … Decided and Entered: July 19, 2018 526092 [*1]In the Matter of FRANK BROWN, Appellant, v TINA M. STANFORD, as Chair of the Board of Parole, Respondent.
Cited 0 timesPublished20 A.D.2d 531 · Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · Dec 17, 1963
The Legislature, in prescribing a minimum wage, cannot be held to have intended that New York City may enact its own minimum wage, albeit a higher one (Wholesale Laundry Bd. of Trade v. … Moreover, while the local law here challenged differs materially from the local law successfully challenged in Wholesale Laundry Bd. of Trade v.
Cited 0 timesPublished218 A.D.2d 913 · Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · Aug 24, 1995
Thus, Supreme Court correctly concluded that Pattison and Eaton were necessary parties since their rights are "inextricably interwoven” with the rights of Petruska and La Posta (see, Matter of Greenspan v O’Rourke, 27 NY2d … 846 ; Matter of Fulani v Smith, 181 AD2d 940, 941 , lv denied 79 NY2d 755 ; Matter of McGoey v Black, 100 AD2d 635, 636 ).
Cited 5 timesPublished258 A.D.2d 958 · Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · Jan 28, 1999
89 NY2d 327, 330 ; Burrell v Countrytowne Apt. … , supra, at 820; Enos v City of Rochester, supra, at 162; see also, Matter of Vetrone v Mackin, 216 AD2d 839, 841 ; Dawson v Bastine, 231 AD2d 548, 548-549 ), which cannot be extended by the issuance of an order nunc pro
Cited 6 timesPublished188 A.D.2d 923 · Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · Dec 24, 1992
891 ; Dykes v Valentino, 147 AD2d 525 ). … by the Zoning Board.
Cited 7 timesPublished
Ask Donna