Case law

Gargiul v. Board of Education

69 A.D.2d 986 · Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · Apr 6, 1979

The board’s finding that petitioner was incompetent is supported by substantial evidence and the punishment imposed is not so disproportionate "' "as to be shocking to one’s sense of fairness”.’ ” (Matter of Pell v Board … Board of Educ., 291 NY 241 ; Matter of Karin v Board of Educ., 56 AD2d 721 , mot for lv to app den 41 NY2d 806 ; Anken v Board of Educ., 42 AD2d 1031 ).

Harradine v. Board of Supervisors

68 A.D.2d 298 · Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · Jun 1, 1979

The action resulted from "the one person, one vote” rule enunciated by the United States Supreme Court in Baker v Carr ( 369 US 186 ) and Avery v Midland County ( 390 US 474 ). … Reapportionment is primarily a matter for the consideration and determination of the legislative body (Burns v Richardson, 384 US 73 ; Matter of Schneider v Rockefeller, 31 NY2d 420 ).

Holton v. Board of Supervisors

245 A.D. 144 · Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · Jun 26, 1935

(Matter of Schmidt v. Board of Supervisors, 244 App. Div. 493 ; Matter of McCartney v. Board of Supervisors of Monroe County, Id. 891; Matter of Jones v. Willcox, 80 id. 167, 171; People ex rel. Corrigan v. … Law, § 51; Civil Service Law, § 28; Olmsted v. Meahl, 219 N. Y. 270 ; Peck v. Belknap, 130 id. 394 ; Schieffelin v. Dolan, 204 App. Div. 351 .)

Francis v. Board of Education

278 A.D.2d 449 · Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · Dec 26, 2000

Co., 258 AD2d 559, 560 ; see, Audiovox Corp. v Benyamini, 265 AD2d 135 ; Scocozza v Tolia, 254 AD2d 475, 476 ; Mayo v Lincoln Triangle Assocs., 248 AD2d 362 ; 22 NYCRR 202.21 [d]). … 270 AD2d 480 ; Castrol, Inc. v Farm Trading Co., 228 AD2d 633 ).

Tenneriello v. Board of Elections

104 A.D.2d 467 · Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · Aug 22, 1984

As to those matters which dealt solely with respondents-respondents’ actions in filing objections with the Board of Elections, petitioners’ attorney stated that he “believe[d] them to be true”. … P., O’Connor, Brown, Boyers and Fiber, JJ., concur.

Masters v. Board of Assessors

188 A.D.2d 471 · Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · Dec 7, 1992

The small claims assessment review procedure is to be construed liberally in order to spare eligible homeowners the time and cost of conventional tax certiorari proceedings (see, Matter of Town of New Castle v Kaufmann, 72 … NY2d 684 ; cf., Matter of Kline v City of Rye, 150 AD2d 576 [approving of broad interpretation but constrained by specific language of statute to deny the petitioner’s claim]).

Lowe v. Board of Education

36 A.D.2d 952 · Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · May 3, 1971

Robertson v. Board of Education

175 A.D.2d 836 · Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · Aug 12, 1991

The petitioner’s direction of correspondence to the Medical Bureau, which can be viewed, at most, as a request for reconsideration, did not toll or revive the Statute of Limitations (see, Matter of Lubin v Board of Educ., … In any event, a review of the entire record shows that there existed a rational basis for the determination (see, Matter of Purdy v Kreisberg, 47 NY2d 354, 358 ; Matter of Pell v Board of Educ., 34 NY2d 222 , 231).

St. Clair Paper Manufacturing Co. v. Brown

16 A.D. 317 · Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · Jul 1, 1897

(Green v. Middlesex R. R. Co., 10 Misc. Rep, 473 ; affd., 90 Hun, 607 ; Fogg v. Fisk, 30 id. 61; Ball v. Fvening Post Pub. Co., 12 Civ. Proc. Rep. 4.) … no interest whatever in the goods replevied otherwise than as a manager for Brown.

Sampson v. Board of Education

255 A.D.2d 434 · Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · Nov 16, 1998

City of New York, 73 NY2d 930, 932 ; Johnson v New York City Bd. of Educ., 249 AD2d 370 ). … She was in the same position as every other school employee, and was an integral part of the safety procedures put in place for the children’s protection (see, Bisignano v City of New York, 136 AD2d 671 ; Thomas v City of

Mark v. Board of Education

255 A.D.2d 586 · Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · Nov 30, 1998

; Matter of Perry v City of New York, 133 AD2d 692 ). … Power Auth., supra; see also, Ribeiro v Town of N.

Rutigliano v. Board of Education

176 A.D.2d 866 · Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · Oct 21, 1991

The cases of Matter of Cordiani v Board of Educ. ( 66 AD2d 780 ) and Serravillo v New York City Tr. … Installation Corp. v Board of Educ., 50 NY2d 780 , affg 72 AD2d 760 ; Matter of Board of Educ. [Wager Constr. Corp., 37 NY2d 283, 290 ).

Robert N. Brown Associates Inc. v. Fileppo

38 A.D.2d 515 · Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · Dec 2, 1971

(Hercules Packing Corp. v. Steinbruckner, 28 A D 2d 635, app. dsmd. 20 N Y 2d 757.) … (Foley v. D’Agostino, 21 A D 2d 60, 66, 67.)

Gaines v. Board of Elections

32 A.D.2d 797 · Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · Jun 9, 1969

In our opinion, respondent Elovieh had standing to object to the petitions for the reasons stated in Matter of Elovich v. Meisser (32 A D 2d 795). … dissent and vote to reverse the order and grant the petition, with the following memorandum: In our opinion, Elovieh had no standing to object to the designating petitions (see dissenting memorandum in Matter of Elovich v.

Wilson v. Board of Education

261 A.D.2d 409 · Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · May 3, 1999

However, since the petitioner was a “party” to neither the collective bargaining agreement nor the arbitration, she lacks standing to seek vacatur of the arbitrator’s award (see, CPLR 7511; Chupka v Lorenz-Schneider Co., … 12 NY2d 1 ; Matter of Alava v Consolidated Edison Co., 183 AD2d 713 ).

People v. Brown

25 A.D.2d 611 · Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · Feb 24, 1966

Memorandum: In the absence of “plain abuse and injustice” (La Beau v. People, 34 N.

Kenny v. Board of Trustees

289 A.D.2d 534 · Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · Dec 31, 2001

Swan v Doxsee, 136 App Div 400, 403 ). … Blais, 30 NY2d 48, 51 ; see also, Meriwether v Garrett, 102 US 472, 513 ).

Grune v. Board of Parole

41 A.D.3d 1014 · Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · Jun 14, 2007

*1015 Dennison, 40 AD3d 1175 [2007]; Matter of Lewis v Travis, 9 AD3d 800 [2004]). … [2000], quoting Matter of Russo v New York State Bd. of Parole, 50 NY2d 69, 77 [1980]).

Petersen v. Board of Elections

218 A.D.2d 776 · Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · Aug 23, 1995

Although the candidate Marina Rejas resides with her daughter, whose name is Marina V. … Sadowski, 45 NY2d 815; Matter of Harfmann v Sachs, 138 AD2d 551 ; Matter of Bachety v Canary, 112 AD2d 1058 ).

Martin v. Board of Education

215 A.D.2d 661 · Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · May 22, 1995

v Board of Coop. … Assocs. v State Div. of Human Rights, 45 NY2d 176, 181 ; Matter of Pell v Board of Educ., 34 NY2d 222 , 230). Here, the Board’s determination was supported by substantial evidence.