Case law

Jaffe v. Board of Education

240 A.D. 402 · Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · Mar 16, 1934

(Stetson v. Board of Education, 218 N. Y. 301, 310 .) … (See Matter of Cusack v. Board of Education, 174 N. Y. 136 ; People ex rel. Wooster v. Maher, 141 id. 330.) In the city of New York the board of education is charged with the administration of the public school system.

Hernandez v. Board of Education

264 A.D.2d 709 · Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · Sep 13, 1999

Assocs., 230 AD2d 903 ; Sandi v Chaucer Assocs., 170 AD2d 663 ). In any event, the Board of Education of the City of New York neither owned the premises nor contracted for the work. … Therefore, it cannot be held liable pursuant to these provisions (see, Kowalska v Board of Educ., 260 AD2d 546 ).

Matter of Brown v. Bratton

2018 NY Slip Op 7541 · Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · Nov 8, 2018

Matter of Brown v Bratton ( 2018 NY Slip Op 07541 ) Matter of Brown v Bratton 2018 NY Slip Op 07541 Decided on November 8, 2018 Appellate Division, First Department Published by New York State Law Reporting Bureau pursuant … Decided on November 8, 2018 Friedman, J.P., Richter, Kahn, Oing, Moulton, JJ. 7563 100978/16 [*1]In re Lisa Brown, Petitioner-Appellant, v Police Commissioner William J. Bratton, et al., Respondents-Respondents.

W. M. Whitney & Co. v. Brown

253 A.D. 180 · Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · Jan 19, 1938

This item was improperly included, and should not have been allowed (Hudson v. Erie R. R. Co., 57 App. D v. 98, and cases there cited; Straub v. Buffalo Broadcasting Corp., 247 id. 566, 569).

Lozinak v. Board of Education

115 A.D.3d 1216 · Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · Mar 21, 2014

Pollard v. Board of Education

280 A.D. 1033 · Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · Nov 12, 1952

(See May v. Board of Educ., Town of Mamaroneck, 295 N. Y. 948 , and Ohman v. Board of Educ. of City of N. Y., 300 N. Y. 306, 309 .) All concur. (Appeal from a judgment for plaintiff in a negligence action.

Claim of Brown v. Mobil Oil Co.

20 A.D.2d 833 · Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · Mar 20, 1964

The misconception of its duty and its assumption of ours manifested by the above-quoted finding of the board deprived the employer of procedural due process and mandates reversal and remittal. (Matter of Bosco v. … Co., 3 A D 2d 781; Matter of Bochkarev v. Henry’s Landscaping Sen., 10 A D 2d 398, 400; Matter of Nolette v. Chase, 11 A D 2d 821.)

Heughes v. Board of Education

37 A.D. 180 · Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · Jan 15, 1899

(People v. … Y. 565 ; People v. *185 McKane, 143 id. 455 ; People v.

Krebs v. Board of Assessors

225 A.D.2d 625 · Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · Mar 11, 1996

of Camillus, 80 NY2d 351, 356 ; Matter of Merrick Holding Corp. v Board of Assessors, 45 NY2d 538, 542 ; Matter of Long Is. … Co. v Assessor for Town of Brookhaven, 202 AD2d 32, 36 ; Matter of Anitec Image Corp. v Assessor of City of Binghamton, 109 AD2d 962, 963 ; Matter of Katz v Assessor of Vil./ Town of Mount Kisco, 82 AD2d 654, 658 ). " 'The

Wagschal v. Board of Examiners of the Board of Education

117 A.D.2d 470 · Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · Jun 16, 1986

186, 194 , cert denied 454 *472 US 1125 ; Matter of Pell v Board of Educ., 34 NY2d 222 ). … It is the Board of Education that establishes requirements and qualifications for its employees (Education Law § 2573 [10]; Matter of Klot v Wilson, 2 AD2d 938 ); the function of Judges is something else.

Bynoe v. Board of Elections

164 A.D.2d 929 · Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · Aug 23, 1990

himself participated in the fraud, his designating petition should be invalidated whether or not there were a sufficient *930 number of valid signatures independent of those fraudulently procured (see, Matter of Flower v … D'Apice, 104 AD2d 578 , affd 63 NY2d 715 ; Matter of MacDougall v Board of Elections, 133 AD2d 198 ).

Radoff v. Board of Education

99 A.D.2d 840 · Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · Feb 27, 1984

Board of Educ., 34 NY2d 222 ). … Petitioner’s remaining contentions have been considered and have been found to be entirely lacking in merit (see Matter of Adlerstein v Board of Educ., 96 AD2d 1077 ). Mollen, P.

Board of Health v. Magill

17 A.D. 249 · Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · Jul 1, 1897

Under a similar provision in chapter 324 of the Laws df .1850, as amended by chapter 351 of 1882, it was in effect held, in Gould v. The Gity- of Rochester ( 105 N. … Board of Health v. Board of Supervisors of Monroe Co., 18 Barb. 567 .) .

Common Council v. Town Board

40 A.D.2d 615 · Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · Sep 13, 1972

the hearing before the Referees that he was in favor of annexation and would so vote if an election were held for that purpose, the statutory special election can be dispensed with (see Matter of City of Saratoga Springs v.

Safchik v. Board of Education

158 A.D.2d 277 · Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · Feb 1, 1990

. * * * The findings of the Medical Arbitrator are equally binding on you and the Board of Education.” Plaintiffs contend that it was error to exclude evidence of the arbitration. … Safchik recites, the arbitration award is mutually binding, and the parties are estopped to contest any issue necessarily decided in that proceeding (Matter of Halyalkar v Board of Regents, 72 NY2d 261, 267 ; Ryan v New York

Board of Managers v. Ainetchi

84 A.D.3d 603 · Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · May 19, 2011

Goodfarb v Freedman, 76 AD2d 565 [1980]). … v Chelsea 19 Assoc., 73 AD3d 581 [2010]).

Claim of Brown v. Brevoort

186 A.D. 929 · Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · Nov 15, 1918

Decision reversed, award vacated, and claim dismissed, on the authority of Matter of Doey v. Howland Co. ( 224 N. Y. 30 ). AH concurred.

Board of Education v. Nyquist

83 A.D.2d 217 · Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · Oct 26, 1981

important function of state and local governments” (Brown v Board of Educ., 347 US 483, 493 ; see, also, Ambach v Norwick, supra; San Antonio School Dist. v Rodriguez, 411 US 1, 29 , supra; Wisconsin v Yoder, 406 US 205, … Carey v Brown, 447 US 455 ; Police Dept. of Chicago v Mosley, 408 US 92 . . See, e.g., Carey v Brown, supra; Police Dept, of Chicago v Mosley, supra. . Matter of Griffiths, 413 US 717 . .

City Council v. Town Board

32 A.D.2d 152 · Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · Jun 3, 1969

A cross application is made by the respondent, Town Board, and respondents-iritervenors, for judgment that the proposed annexation is not in the over-all public interest. … (Matter of Common Council of City of Middletown v. Town Bd. of Town of Wallkill, 29 A D 2d 561, 562.)

Brown v. M. P. Smith & Sons Co.

190 A.D. 887 · Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · Nov 15, 1919