Case law

Opinions from 1658 to today.

Filtersnyappdiv

10,000+ results

0.51s

  • Meyer v. Woodward-Brown Realty Co.

    209 A.D. 874 · Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · Jun 15, 1924

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • Brown v. Capital City Surety Co.

    217 A.D. 772 · Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · Jun 15, 1926

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • Brown v. Long Beach Lumber Co.

    228 A.D. 790 · Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · Feb 15, 1930

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • People ex rel. Brown v. Austin

    168 A.D. 960 · Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · May 15, 1915

    Brown v. Freisch, No. 1 (ante, p. 370), decided herewith, and as so modified unanimously affirmed, without costs. Jenks, P. J., Carr, Rich and Putnam, JJ., concurred. Order to be settled before the presiding justice.

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • People ex rel. Brown v. Brunger

    168 A.D. 961 · Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · May 15, 1915

    Brown v. Freisch, No. 1 (ante, p. 370), decided herewith, and as so modified unanimously affirmed, without costs. Jenks, P. J., Carr, Rich and Putnam, JJ., concurred. Order to be settled before the presiding justice.

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • People ex rel. Brown v. Scott

    168 A.D. 963 · Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · May 15, 1915

    Brown v. Freisch, No. 1 (ante, p. 370), decided herewith, and as so modified unanimously affirmed, without costs. Jenks, P. J., Carr, Rich and Putnam, JJ., concurred. Order to be settled before the presiding justice.

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • Brown v. United Air Lines, Inc.

    272 A.D.2d 757 · Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · Apr 8, 1947

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • Trinity Church of Potsdam v. Brown

    84 N.Y.S. 1148 · Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · Nov 11, 1903

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • People ex rel. Brown v. Tighe

    127 N.Y.S. 1137 · Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · Jan 13, 1911

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • Brown v. George I. Roberts & Bros.

    137 N.Y.S. 1112 · Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · Oct 4, 1912

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • People ex rel. Brown v. Sutton

    39 N.Y.S. 492 · Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · Apr 28, 1896

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • Power v. Board of Trustees

    96 A.D.2d 728 · Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · Jul 11, 1983

    Board of Educ., 34 NY2d 222 , 233; cf. … Matter of Santarella v New York City Dept, of Correction, 53 NY2d 948 ).

    Cited 3 timesPublished
  • Columbia Terrace Development Corp. v. Brown

    153 A.D.2d 832 · Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · Sep 11, 1989

    Sterling Drug, 69 NY2d 329 ; Murphy v American Home Prods. … P., Brown, Eiber and Harwood, JJ., concur.

    Cited 2 timesPublished
  • Kryger v. Board of Education

    37 A.D.2d 622 · Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · Jun 23, 1971

    However, this statute has been declared unconstitutional (Lee v. Nyquist, 318 F. Supp. 710 , affd. 402 U. S. 935 ). … However, the powers conferred upon community boards by this statute are limited to those “ not inconsistent with * * * the policies established by the city board ”. The policy of using P. S. 18 and P.

    Cited 5 timesPublished
  • Thomas v. Board of Education

    291 A.D.2d 710 · Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · Feb 21, 2002

    Further, a bus operator such as Laidlaw owes the very same duty to the students *712 entrusted to its care and custody (see, Pratt v Robinson, 39 NY2d 554, 560 ; Harker v Rochester City School Dist., 241 AD2d 937, 938 , lv … The security officer boarded the bus, but by that time Gilbert and Grimm had already fled.

    Cited 10 timesPublished
  • Kinner v. Board of Education

    6 A.D.2d 204 · Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · Jul 9, 1958

    Rason Asphalt v. Town of Oyster Boy ( 8 Misc 2d 411 ) and Edlux Constr. Corp. v. State of New York ( 252 App. Div. 373 , affd. 277 N. … Y. 165 , supra) is demonstrated by two decisions where this court was required to bar school teachers from receiving salary increases by reason of late filing pf claims (Todd v. Board of Educ., 272. App.

    Cited 4 timesPublished
  • Claim of Butterfield v. Brown

    261 A.D. 1022 · Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · Mar 12, 1941

    Award reversed and claim dismissed, with costs against the State Industrial Board. Hill, P. J., Crapser, Bliss and Foster, JJ., concur; Heffernan, J., dissents. … (Matter of Miles v. Colegrove, 258 App. Div. 1014 ; affd., 284 N. Y. 609 .)

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • Richardson v. Board of Education

    80 A.D.2d 901 · Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · Mar 16, 1981

    However, we may consider the matter as if it had been transferred properly (see Matter of King v Board of Educ., 71 AD2d 895 ). … The penalty of dismissal is not so disproportionate to the offenses charged as to be shocking to one’s sense of fairness (see Matter of Pell v Board of Educ., 34 NY2d 222 ). Titone, J.

    Cited 2 timesPublished
  • Billinger v. Board of Education

    271 A.D.2d 630 · Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · Apr 24, 2000

    While schools are under a duty to adequately supervise the students in their care, they are not insurers of the students’ safety (see, Mirand v City of New York, 84 NY2d 44, 49 ). … A plaintiff must also establish that the alleged breach of the duty to provide adequate supervision was a proximate cause of the injuries sustained (see, Mirand v City of New York, supra, at 50; Schlecker v Connetquot Cent

    Cited 3 timesPublished
  • Sulzer v. Environmental Control Board

    165 A.D.2d 270 · Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · Feb 26, 1991

    (See, e.g., Smith v Goguen, 415 US 566 ; People v Dietze, 75 NY2d 47, 53 .) … Such proceeding shall be commenced by the service of notice of violation returnable before the board.” .

    Cited 8 timesPublished

Ask Donna

Ask Donna

A word about cookies

We need a few to keep you signed in and the library working. The rest help us see which pages people use and where they get stuck. They stay off unless you say yes.