Case law

Traitel Marble Co. v. Brown Bros.

160 A.D. 881 · Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · Dec 15, 1913

Brown v. H. C. Bohack Co.

6 A.D.2d 821 · Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · Jun 23, 1958

People ex rel. Brown v. O'Brien

168 A.D. 963 · Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · May 15, 1915

Brown v. Freisch, No. 1 (ante, p. 370), decided herewith, and as so modified unanimously affirmed, without costs. Jenks, P. J., Carr, Rich and Putnam, JJ., concurred. Order to be settled before the presiding justice.

Brown v. City of New York

277 A.D.2d 1027 · Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · Nov 14, 1950

Knauf v. E. C. Brown Co.

10 A.D.2d 599 · Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · Jan 13, 1960

People ex rel. Brown v. Herold

9 A.D.2d 696 · Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · Oct 1, 1959

Courtland v. Brown, Harris, Stevens, Inc.

5 A.D.2d 815 · Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · Feb 11, 1958

Altman v. Brown, Wheelock, Harris & Co.

249 A.D. 614 · Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · Nov 20, 1936

Chupka v. Board of Education

240 A.D.2d 795 · Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · Jun 5, 1997

Board of Educ, 236 AD2d 709 ), the Hearing Officer’s error in this regard does not mandate annulment. … Board of Educ., supra, at 711).

Steger v. Board of Examiners of the Board of Education

261 A.D. 816 · Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · Jan 24, 1941

Javete v. Board of Superintendents of the Board of Education

268 A.D. 848 · Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · Oct 6, 1944

Flanagan v. Board of Education

63 A.D.2d 1013 · Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · Jun 26, 1978

Since the complaint seeks damages as well as equitable relief, the claim is not primarily equitable in nature and a notice of claim was a condition precedent to the commencement of this action (see Ruocco v Doyle, 38 AD2d

Alecsandrescu v. Board of Education

63 A.D.2d 955 · Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · Jun 5, 1978

Proceeding pursuant to section 298 of the Executive Law to review an order of the State Human Rights Appeal Board, dated January 6, 1978, which affirmed an order of the State Division of Human Rights, dated May 16, 1977, … Were we to have considered this proceeding on its merits, we would have dismissed it, since petitioner failed to make out a prima facie case of discrimination, based upon substantial evidence (see Matter of Winston v Board

Brown v. Harlem Laundre-Centre, Inc.

42 A.D.2d 513 · Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · Jun 5, 1973

the circumstances here dis *514 closed, orderly procedure requires that defendants first conduct ah examination of plaintiff before they attempt to discover and inspect any relevant specifically designated documents (Bios v.

People ex rel. Brown v. Follette

31 A.D.2d 954 · Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · Mar 17, 1969

Keitt v. McMann, 18 N Y 2d 257, 262; People ex rel. Garcia V. Warden, 28 A D 2d 682, mot. for lv. to app. den. 20 N Y 2d 645). Christ, Acting P. J., Brennan, Rabin, Benjamin and Munder, JJ., concur.

Brown v. Colonial Motor Coach Corp.

238 A.D. 850 · Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · Mar 15, 1933

Brown v. General Drop Forge Co.

163 A.D. 936 · Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · May 15, 1914

People ex rel. Brown v. Brunger

168 A.D. 961 · Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · May 15, 1915

Brown v. Freisch, No. 1 (ante, p. 370), decided herewith, and as so modified unanimously affirmed, without costs. Jenks, P. J., Carr, Rich and Putnam, JJ., concurred. Order to be settled before the presiding justice.

People ex rel. Brown v. Higgins

168 A.D. 962 · Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · May 15, 1915

Brown v. Freisch, No. 1 (ante, p. 370), decided *963 herewith, and as so modified unanimously affirmed, without costs. Jenks, P. J., Carr, Rich and Putnam, JJ., concurred.

People ex rel. Brown v. Hannigan

168 A.D. 962 · Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · May 15, 1915

Brown v. Freisch No. 1 (ante, p. 370), decided herewith, and as so modified unanimously affirmed, without costs. Jenks, P. J., Carr, Rich and Putnam, JJ., concurred. Order to be settled before the presiding justice.