Case law

Brown v. Mitchell-Lewis Motor Co.

174 A.D. 420 · Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · Nov 3, 1916

Brown v. City of New York

258 A.D. 878 · Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · Dec 18, 1939

Brown v. George I. Roberts & Bros.

137 N.Y.S. 1112 · Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · Oct 18, 1912

Brown v. Cooper Paper Box Co.

126 A.D. 923 · Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · May 15, 1908

Brown v. Mitchell-Lewis Motor Co.

159 N.Y.S. 1102 · Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · Jun 23, 1916

Brown v. Cooper Paper Box Co.

111 N.Y.S. 1111 · Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · May 20, 1908

Izquierdo v. Board of Estimate

141 A.D.2d 337 · Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · Jun 7, 1988

The court below remitted the matter to the Board of Estimate for reconsideration. This was error. … (Matter of Wilson v City of New York, 135 AD2d 441, 442 ; Solomon v City of New York, 94 AD2d 283, 286 .)

King v. Board of Education

71 A.D.2d 895 · Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · Aug 13, 1979

Co.], 43 NY2d 184, 189-190 ; Rembrandt Inds. v Hodges Int., 38 NY2d 502 ). … The penalty of dismissal as acting principal and reassignment as a teacher is not so disproportionate to the offenses charged as to be shocking to one’s *896 sense of fairness (see Matter of Pell v Board of Educ., 34 NY2d

Carlan v. Board of Education

128 A.D.2d 706 · Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · Mar 16, 1987

Board of Educ., 34 NY2d 222 ; Matter of Koch v Webster Cent. … Commn., 45 NY2d 721 ; Kaczala v Board of Educ., 123 AD2d 668 ). We have considered all of the petitioner’s remaining contentions and find them to be without merit. Rubin, J. P., Kunzeman, Spatt and Harwood, JJ., concur.

Weigand v. Board of Sup'rs

58 N.Y.S. 1151 · Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · May 31, 1899

Moore v. Board of Education

122 A.D. 924 · Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · Dec 15, 1907

Banks v. Board of Education

140 A.D. 907 · Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · Oct 15, 1910

Buckbee v. Board of Education

116 A.D. 916 · Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · Dec 15, 1906

Hardecker v. Board of Education

266 A.D. 980 · Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · Oct 25, 1943

BROWN, DANA P. v. HEUBUSCH, VICKI L.

124 A.D.3d 1396 · Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · Jan 2, 2015

BROWN, PETITIONER-APPELLANT, V MEMORANDUM AND ORDER VICKI L. HEUBUSCH, RESPONDENT-RESPONDENT. WYOMING COUNTY-ATTICA LEGAL AID BUREAU, WARSAW (ADAM W. … We therefore conclude that Family Court properly dismissed the petition for lack of jurisdiction (see Matter of Maida v Capraro, 86 AD3d 924, 924; Matter of Zippo v Zippo, 41 AD3d 915, 916).

Brown v. Unlimited Security Services, Inc.

196 A.D.2d 443 · Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · Aug 12, 1993

Presley v. Board of Education

43 A.D.2d 893 · Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · Jan 17, 1974

In September, 1962 she was hired as an elementary school teacher by the respondent board under a first year probationary contract for the school year beginning July 1, 1962. … At the termination of the three years of probationary appointments, the recommendation of the Superintendent that she be given tenure effective September 1, 1965 was approved by the respondent board.

Brown v. Melba Foods Specialties, Inc.

106 A.D.2d 259 · Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · Dec 4, 1984

Hofsiss v. Board of Education

287 A.D.2d 566 · Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · Oct 15, 2001

and * * * it is therefore inappropriate for the courts to express views with respect thereto pending determination by the board” (Botwinick v Ogden, 59 NY2d 909, 911 ; see also, O’Rourke v Long, 41 NY2d 219 ; White v Marriott … Assocs. v State Div. of Human Rights, supra, at 182; Matter of Pell v Board of Educ., 34 NY2d 222 , 231). Krausman, J. P., Friedmann and Smith, JJ., concur.

Board of Education v. Sandman

229 A.D. 853 · Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · Jun 15, 1930