Case law

Opinions from 1658 to today.

Filtersnyappdiv

10,000+ results

1.37s

  • Commissioner of Social Services v. Brown

    229 A.D.2d 537 · Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · Jul 22, 1996

    Application of the CSSA creates a rebuttable presumption that the statutory guidelines will yield the correct amount of child support (see, Matter of Keay v Menda, 210 AD2d 483 ). … see also, Nicholas v Cirelli, 209 AD2d 840 ).

    Cited 2 timesPublished
  • Mateo v. Board of Education

    285 A.D.2d 552 · Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · Jul 16, 2001

    Board of Educ., 285 AD2d 573 [decided herewith]). … Board of Educ., supra; Matter of Levine v Board of Educ., 272 AD2d 328 ; Matter of Persico v Board of Educ., 220 AD2d 512 ; Matter of Schulman v Board of Educ., 184 AD2d 643 ).

    Cited 11 timesPublished
  • Hendrickson-Brown v. City of White Plains

    92 A.D.3d 638 · Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · Feb 7, 2012

    County of Nassau, 22 AD2d 954 [1964], affd 16 NY2d 663 [1965]; Augush v Town of Yorktown, 303 AD2d 340, 341 [2003]; Bennett v City of New York, 204 AD2d 587 [1994]; Allee v City of New York, 42 AD2d 899 [1973]). … of Newburgh, 245 AD2d 424, 425 [1997]; Minott v City of New York, 203 AD2d 265, 267 [1994]).

    Cited 9 timesPublished
  • Board of Education v. Allen

    32 A.D.2d 985 · Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · Jul 1, 1969

    [f]) is in the nature of a demurrer and only the -petition may be considered (Matter of Berlingieri v. O’Connell, 3 A D 2d 762). … Thus the motion must be denied if there is present a triable issue of fact (Matter of Borko v. Giordano, 29 A D 2d 546).

    Cited 14 timesPublished
  • Frontier Insurance v. Town Board

    252 A.D.2d 928 · Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · Jul 30, 1998

    Co. v Housing Auth, 87 NY2d 36, 41 ). … v Village of Remsen, 202 AD2d 991 ).

    Cited 21 timesPublished
  • Brown v. Monserrate

    106 A.D.2d 754 · Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · Dec 13, 1984

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • BROWN, LEROY, PEOPLE v

    Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · Apr 20, 2012

    THE PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK, RESPONDENT, V MEMORANDUM AND ORDER LEROY BROWN, DEFENDANT-APPELLANT. TIMOTHY P. DONAHER, PUBLIC DEFENDER, ROCHESTER (DAVID R. … a specified basis” (People v Beggs, 19 AD3d 1150, 1151, lv denied 5 NY3d 803; see People v Parks, 66 AD3d 1429, 1430, lv denied 14 NY3d 804; see generally People v Romero, 7 NY3d 911, 912).

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • Brown v. Smith

    105 A.D.2d 1142 · Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · Nov 7, 1984

    Judgment unanimously reversed and petition granted (see Matter of Jones v Smith, 120 Mise 2d 445, affd 101 AD2d 705 ). (Appeal from judgment of Supreme Court, Wyoming County, Kane, J. — art 78.)

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • Abrams v. Board of Education

    91 A.D.2d 618 · Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · Dec 13, 1982

    Lorenz-Schneider Co., 12 NY2d 1 ; Matter of Potoker [Brooklyn Eagle], 2 NY2d 553 ; Aloi v Board of Educ., 81 AD2d 874 ; Berlyn v Board of Educ., 80 AD2d 572 , affd 55 NY2d 912 ; Matter of Berens [Robineau], 278 App Div 710 … Borock, 5 NY2d 156; Berlyn v Board of Educ., supra).

    Cited 5 timesPublished
  • People v. Brown

    104 A.D.2d 895 · Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · Oct 9, 1984

    — Judgment of the Supreme Court, Kings County (Douglass, J.), rendered July 28, 1982, affirmed {People v Johnson, 59 NY2d 1014, 1016 ; People v Miller, 52 AD2d 425, affd 43 NY2d 789 ). Titone, J.

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • People v. Brown

    38 A.D.3d 913 · Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · Mar 27, 2007

    Counsel’s application for leave to withdraw as counsel is granted (see Anders v California, 386 US 738 [1967]; People v Paige, 54 AD2d 631 [1976]; cf. People v Gonzalez, 47 NY2d 606 [1979]).

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • Matter of Brown v. City of New York

    2022 NY Slip Op 00860 · Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · Feb 9, 2022

    Matter of Brown v City of New York ( 2022 NY Slip Op 00860 ) Matter of Brown v City of New York 2022 NY Slip Op 00860 Decided on February 9, 2022 Appellate Division, Second Department Published by New York State Law Reporting … DOWLING, JJ. 2019-06370 (Index No. 524696/18) [*1]In the Matter of Pincus Brown, appellant, v City of New York, et al., respondents. Wolf & Associates, PLLC, Brooklyn, NY (Martin Wolf of counsel), for appellant.

    Cited 14 timesPublished
  • Dass v. Board of Regents

    73 A.D.2d 997 · Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · Jan 17, 1980

    AD2d 1091 ; Matter of Pannone v New York State Edue. … Our review of the propriety of the penalty imposed in these matters is severely restricted (see Pell v Board ofEduc., 34 NY2d 222 , 233, 234), and under the circumstances here prevailing, we cannot conclude that the penalty

    Cited 4 timesPublished
  • Carville v. Board of Education

    11 A.D.2d 1092 · Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · Oct 27, 1960

    position, August 20, 1959, to the date of the petitioner’s reinstatement to his original position pursuant to the order of this court, was an adequate measure of discipline and, therefore, we modify the determination of the board … (Matter of Bentley v. Senninger, 10 A D 2d 900.) Present — Bastow, J. P., Goldman, Halpern, McClusky and Henry, JJ.

    Cited 2 timesPublished
  • Brown v. ESRT Empire State Bldg., L.L.C.

    2019 NY Slip Op 345 · Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · Jan 17, 2019

    Brown v ESRT Empire State Bldg., L.L.C. ( 2019 NY Slip Op 00345 ) Brown v ESRT Empire State Bldg., L.L.C. 2019 NY Slip Op 00345 Decided on January 17, 2019 Appellate Division, First Department Published by New York State … Decided on January 17, 2019 Sweeny, J.P., Gische, Tom, Mazzarelli, Kern, JJ. 7444 163017/15 [*1]Christopher Brown, Plaintiff-Respondent, v ESRT Empire State Building, L.L.C., et al., Defendants- Appellants.

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • Kirsch v. Board of Education

    155 A.D.3d 1610 · Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · Nov 9, 2017

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • Alexander v. Board of Education

    18 A.D.3d 654 · Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · May 16, 2005

    School, 306 AD2d 347 [2003]; Matter of Canty v City of New York, 273 AD2d 467, 468 [2000]). … ]; Medley v Cichon, 305 AD2d 643, 645 [2003]).

    Cited 9 timesPublished
  • May v. Board of Education

    269 A.D. 959 · Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · Oct 29, 1945

    (Clark v. City of Buffalo, 288 N. Y. 62 .) Judgment affirmed, with costs. Close, P. … (Carlock v. Westchester Lighting Co., 268 N. Y. 345, 350 .)

    Cited 7 timesPublished
  • Jenkins v. Board of Elections

    270 A.D.2d 436 · Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · Mar 23, 2000

    Withers, 186 AD2d 836 ; Matter of Oberle v Caracappa, 133 AD2d 241 ). … possible and those branches of the petition which seek to validate the nomination of Cynthia Jenkins and invalidate the nomination of Carolyn Younger must, therefore, be dismissed (see, Matter of Marin v Board of Elections

    Cited 7 timesPublished
  • BROWN, DERYL, PEOPLE v

    Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · Mar 16, 2012

    THE PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK, RESPONDENT, V MEMORANDUM AND ORDER DERYL BROWN, DEFENDANT-APPELLANT. (APPEAL NO. 1.) TIMOTHY P. … We reject that contention (see generally People v Edwards, 95 NY2d 486, 493-494; People v Darden, 34 NY2d 177, 181-182, rearg denied 34 NY2d 995).

    Cited 0 timesPublished

Ask Donna

Ask Donna

A word about cookies

We need a few to keep you signed in and the library working. The rest help us see which pages people use and where they get stuck. They stay off unless you say yes.