Case law

Opinions from 1658 to today.

Filtersnyappdiv

10,000+ results

1.41s

  • Bingham v. Town Board

    103 A.D.2d 923 · Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · Jul 12, 1984

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • People v. Brown

    135 A.D.2d 1144 · Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · Dec 18, 1987

    Counsel’s application to withdraw granted (see, People v Crawford, 71 AD2d 38 ). (Appeal from judgment of Jefferson County Court, Parker, J. — attempted burglary, second degree.) Present — Callahan, J.

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • Rodriguez v. Board of Parole

    100 A.D.3d 1179 · Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · Nov 15, 2012

    of Barrier v New York State Bd. of Parole Appeals Unit, 283 AD2d 700, 700 [2001]). … New York State Bd. of Parole, 50 NY2d 69, 77 [1980]), and we discern no basis upon which to disturb it (see Matter of Valentino v Evans, 92 AD3d at 1055 ; Matter of Maricevic v Evans, 86 AD3d at 880 ).

    Cited 2 timesPublished
  • Hilliker v. Town Board

    240 A.D. 944 · Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · Nov 15, 1933

    Order reversed on the law and facts, with ten dollars costs and disbursements, and motion denied, without costs, on the ground that it does not satisfactorily appear that the action of the town board in denying the application

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • People v. Brown

    134 A.D.2d 439 · Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · Nov 16, 1987

    Viewing the evidence in a light most favorable to the People, we find that the evidence was legally sufficient to support the verdict (see, People v Lewis, 64 NY2d 1111 ). … that the court abused its discretion in denying the defendant’s application for a delay in the proceedings to afford him the opportunity to retain new counsel, which was made at the commencement of his trial (see, People v

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • Kruysman v. Brown

    122 A.D.2d 24 · Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · Jul 7, 1986

    Brown and Eddies Taxi Corp., separately appeal from an interlocutory judgment of the Supreme Court, Nassau County (Spatt, J.), entered April 9, 1985, which, inter alia, upon a jury verdict after trial on the issue of liability … The jury’s apportionment of fault was amply supported by the record (see, Alexander v Eldred, 63 NY2d 460, 464 ; Cohen v Hallmark Cards, 45 NY2d 493, 499 ).

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • Vizcarrondo v. Board of Education

    17 A.D.3d 144 · Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · Apr 7, 2005

    *145 Order, Supreme Court, Bronx County (Stanley Green, J.), entered February 6, 2004, which, in an action by an infant and her parent against the Board of Education and City of New York for personal injuries sustained in … of plaintiffs’ discovery demands, and plausibly explained their initial noncompliance as the result of a mistaken belief that they were required to disclose only the assailants’ names and last known addresses (see Frye v

    Cited 3 timesPublished
  • Kopelson v. Appeals Board

    120 A.D.2d 570 · Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · May 12, 1986

    — Proceeding pursuant to CPLR article 78 to review so much of a determination of the respondent Appeals Board of the New York State Department of Motor Vehicles, dated April 30, 1984, as affirmed the finding of an Administrative

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • First Federal Savings & Loan Ass'n v. Brown

    78 A.D.2d 119 · Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · Dec 23, 1980

    Brown and Barbara Bex Brown. … ; Rosenblum v Dingfelder, 111 F2d 406).

    Cited 29 timesPublished
  • Jacobs v. Board of Assessors

    73 A.D.2d 810 · Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · Dec 14, 1979

    review case can be made only when the court finds that the assessment was increased without adequate cause or that the amount of the assessment was grossly discriminatory (Real Property Tax Law, § 722, subd 2; Grant Co. v … Srogi, 71 AD2d 457 ; Matter of Rice v Srogi, 70 AD2d 764 ).

    Cited 2 timesPublished
  • People v. Brown

    120 A.D.2d 671 · Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · May 19, 1986

    Counsel is granted leave to withdraw as counsel (see, Anders v California, 386 US 738 ; People v Paige, 54 AD2d 631 ; cf. People v Gonzalez, 47 NY2d 606 ). Mollen, P.

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • People v. Brown

    133 A.D.2d 276 · Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · Aug 31, 1987

    Counsel is granted leave to withdraw as counsel (see, Anders v California, 386 US 738 ; People v Paige, 54 AD2d 631 ). … We have considered the points raised by counsel at the defendant’s request and find those contentions to be without merit (see, People v Baldi, 54 NY2d 137 ; People v Pellegrino, 60 NY2d 636 ; People v Harris, 61 NY2d 9 )

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • Danyi v. Board of Trustees

    176 A.D.2d 451 · Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · Oct 1, 1991

    (Matter of Drayson v Board of Trustees of Police Pension Fund, 37 AD2d 378 , affd 32 NY2d 852 .) … (Matter of Becker v Ward, 169 AD2d 453 .)

    Cited 11 timesPublished
  • Abraham v. Board of Regents

    216 A.D.2d 812 · Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · Jun 29, 1995

    Upon its review of the Committee’s report, respondent Board of Regents modified the penalty by suspending petitioner’s practical nursing license for 18 months, with the last 12 months stayed, and by suspending her registered … Board of Regents, 97 AD2d 661, 662 ).

    Cited 9 timesPublished
  • Sachs v. Board of Education

    71 A.D.2d 898 · Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · Aug 13, 1979

    Absent a constitutionally impermissible purpose, or the violation of a statutory proscription, a probationary employee "may be dismissed for almost any reason, or for no reason at all” (Matter of Venes v Community School … James v Board of Educ., 37 NY2d 891 ). Lazer, J. P., Rabin and Margett, JJ., concur.

    Cited 6 timesPublished
  • Borelli v. Board of Education

    156 A.D.2d 903 · Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · Dec 28, 1989

    The courts of this State have consistently held that liability for injury caused by a fight cannot be predicated upon supervisory negligence if the plaintiff voluntarily entered into the fight (Ruggerio v Board of Educ., … Clearly, "[plaintiff’s conduct, demonstrating a lack of reasonable regard for his own safety, was a direct cause of the incident resulting in his injury and, as such, defeats his right of recovery” (Ruggerio v Board of Educ

    Cited 8 timesPublished
  • Conklin v. Town Board

    53 A.D.2d 668 · Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · Jun 21, 1976

    In a proceeding pursuant to CPLR article 78 inter alia to compel respondent to reinstate petitioners as members of the Planning Board of the Town of Warwick, petitioners appeal (by permission) from an order of the Supreme

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • Skliar v. Board of Education

    45 A.D.2d 1012 · Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · Jul 29, 1974

    Section 2510 of the Education Law is applicable to respondents’ school district (Matter of Baron v. Mackreth, 30 A D 2d 810, affd. 26 N Y 2d 1039). … The Board of Education is not, in our opinion, vested with the discretion which would allow it to retain teachers in positions not abolished because of superior teaching abilities in disregard of the seniority provisions

    Cited 13 timesPublished
  • Halliday v. Planning Board

    48 A.D.2d 746 · Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · May 22, 1975

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • Glass v. Town Board

    38 A.D.2d 840 · Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · Feb 14, 1972

    Cited 0 timesPublished

Ask Donna

Ask Donna

A word about cookies

We need a few to keep you signed in and the library working. The rest help us see which pages people use and where they get stuck. They stay off unless you say yes.