Case law

Mitchell v. Brown

43 A.D.3d 1010 · Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · Sep 18, 2007

In light of our determination of the separate appeal by the defendants from the judgment dated January 24, 2006, (see Mitchell v Brown, 43 AD3d 1009 [2007] [decided herewith]), this appeal has been rendered academic and therefore

People v. Brown

135 A.D.2d 1144 · Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · Dec 18, 1987

Counsel’s application to withdraw granted (see, People v Crawford, 71 AD2d 38 ). (Appeal from judgment of Jefferson County Court, Parker, J. — attempted burglary, second degree.) Present — Callahan, J.

People v. Brown

130 A.D.2d 358 · Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · May 7, 1987

(See, Anders v California, 386 US 738 ; People v Saunders, 52 AD2d 833.)

Sanchez v. Brown, Harris, Stevens, Inc.

234 A.D.2d 170 · Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · Dec 19, 1996

fact also exists as to whether the managing agent, even if not plaintiff’s employer, aided and abetted the superintendent’s harassment of plaintiff, which would render it liable under Executive Law § 296 (6) (see, Peck v … Sony Music Corp., 221 AD2d 157 ; Steadman v Sinclair, 223 AD2d 392 ).

People v. Brown

134 A.D.2d 439 · Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · Nov 16, 1987

Viewing the evidence in a light most favorable to the People, we find that the evidence was legally sufficient to support the verdict (see, People v Lewis, 64 NY2d 1111 ). … that the court abused its discretion in denying the defendant’s application for a delay in the proceedings to afford him the opportunity to retain new counsel, which was made at the commencement of his trial (see, People v

People v. Brown

133 A.D.2d 276 · Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · Aug 31, 1987

Counsel is granted leave to withdraw as counsel (see, Anders v California, 386 US 738 ; People v Paige, 54 AD2d 631 ). … We have considered the points raised by counsel at the defendant’s request and find those contentions to be without merit (see, People v Baldi, 54 NY2d 137 ; People v Pellegrino, 60 NY2d 636 ; People v Harris, 61 NY2d 9 )

Brown v. New York Economic Development Corp.

234 A.D.2d 33 · Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · Dec 5, 1996

Co., 218 AD2d 633 ; Balaj v Equitable Life Assur. Socy., 211 AD2d 487 , lv denied 85 NY2d 811 ; Elezaj v Carlin Constr. … Co., 225 AD2d *34 441, 443 , lv granted 228 AD2d 1008 ; Sheridan v Beaver Tower, 229 AD2d 302, 304 ). The third cause of action also should have been dismissed.

McAndrew v. Board of Education

120 A.D.2d 591 · Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · May 12, 1986

Brown v. Motor Vehicle Accident Indemnification Corp.

33 A.D.3d 832 · Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · Oct 24, 2006

AD3d 747 [2005]; Kaminsky v Waldner, 19 AD3d 370 [2005]; Spuhler v Khan, 14 AD3d 693 [2005]; Omar v Bello, 13 AD3d 430 [2004]; Scotti v Boutureira, 8 AD3d 652 [2004]; see also Toure v Avis Rent A Car Sys., 98 NY2d 345 [2002 … ]; Gaddy v Eyler, 79 NY2d 955 [1992]; Willis v New York City Tr.

Rice v. Board of Education

302 A.D.2d 578 · Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · Feb 24, 2003

We recently held in Alvia v Teman Elec. … We note that the plaintiff may raise, as an alternative ground for affirmance, arguments concerning the denial of his motion for judgment as a matter of law under Labor Law § 240 (1) (see Parochial Bus Sys. v Board of Educ

Belnavis v. Board of Trustees

84 A.D.2d 244 · Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · Jan 7, 1982

Upon review, respondent board of trustees adopted the medical board’s recommendation by a split vpte (Matter of City of New York v Schoeck, 294 NY 559 ). … The board of trustees again concurred by a split vote. (Matter of City of New York v Schoeck, supra.)

Brown v. City of New York

76 N.Y.S. 26 · Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · May 1, 1902

supervisors shall and may be retained by the said party of the first part until all such suits or claims for damages as aforesaid shall have been settled, and evidence to that effect furnished to the satisfaction of the board … This was the doctrine-of Cranford v. City of Brooklyn, 13 App. Div. 151 , 43 N. Y.

Brown v. City of New York

279 A.D. 741 · Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · Dec 18, 1951

Cohen v. Brown, Harris, Stevens, Inc.

99 A.D.2d 732 · Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · Feb 23, 1984

Co. v 263 Ninth Ave. Realty, 88 AD2d 877 , affd 57 NY2d 1038 .) … Since the rental value of the rooms as professional office space well exceeds $1,000 per month, the board’s determination seems fiscally prudent. (Compare Goldstone v Constable, 84 AD2d 519 .) Concur — Sullivan, J.

Moritz v. Board of Education

60 A.D.2d 161 · Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · Dec 16, 1977

455 ; Matter of Monan v Board of Educ., 280 *166 App Div 14 ; Matter of Nyboe v Allen, supra). … (Matter of Reisinger v Board of Educ., 57 AD2d 868 ; cf.

Fisk v. Town Board

231 A.D.2d 966 · Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · Sep 27, 1996

Martin v. Board of Trustees

86 A.D.3d 645 · Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · Jul 26, 2011

County Dept. of Social Servs., 81 AD3d 831 [2011]; Matter of Ward v Juettner, 63 AD3d 748 [2009]; Matter of Duda v Board of Educ. of Uniondale Union Free School Dist., 34 AD3d 580, 581 [2006]; Matter of Maher v Cade, 15 … Assoc v State Div. of Human Rights, 45 NY2d at 184 ; Matter of Duda v Board of Educ. of Uniondale Union Free School Dist., 34 AD3d 580 [2006]; Matter of Maher v Cade, 15 AD3d 489 [2005]; Matter of Mann v Town of Monroe, 2

Rathbone v. Board of Education

47 A.D.2d 172 · Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · Mar 27, 1975

(Board of Regents v. Roth, 408 U. S. 564 ; Perry v. Sindermann, 408 U. S. 593 ; Matter of Lesette v. Board of Educ., Hudson City School Dist., 35 N Y 2d 272, 278.) … She was, therefore, not entitled to a hearing before the board.

People v. Brown

125 A.D.2d 321 · Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · Dec 1, 1986

Thus, suppression was unwarranted (see, People v Adams, 53 NY2d 241 ). The sentences were not excessive (see, People v Kazepis, 101 AD2d 816 ). Bracken, J. P., Niehoff, Eiber and Kunzeman, JJ., concur.

People v. Brown

130 A.D.2d 585 · Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · May 11, 1987

Finally, the identification of the defendant as a participant in the offenses by his two accomplices and a witness provided ample probable cause for his arrest (see, People v Berzups, 49 NY2d 417 ; People v White, 109 AD2d … 68 NY2d 1003 ; People v Gordon, 110 AD2d 778 ; People v Green, 103 AD2d 362 ; see generally, People v Mealer, 57 NY2d 214 , cert denied 460 US 1024 ).