Case law

Brown v. Security Union Title Insurance

192 A.D.2d 386 · Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · Apr 13, 1993

Fern v. Brown, Harris, Stevens, Inc.

190 A.D.2d 515 · Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · Feb 2, 1993

Brown v. Dataw Island Realty, Inc.

151 A.D.2d 1044 · Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · Jun 2, 1989

Memorandum: The court did not abuse its discretion in granting defendant’s motion to dismiss the complaint on the ground of fórum non conveniens (CPLR 327 [a]; Islamic Republic v Pahlavi, 62 NY2d 474, 479 , cert denied 469 … US 1108 ; Silver v Great Am.

Tomlinson v. Board of Education

183 A.D.2d 1023 · Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · May 14, 1992

Alleging negligent supervision, plaintiff thereafter commenced this action individually and on her son’s behalf against the City’s *1024 Board of Education and School District. … Board of Educ., 1 AD2d 973 ).

Colello v. Town Board

251 A.D.2d 404 · Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · Jun 8, 1998

—In a proceeding pursuant to CPLR article 78 to review a determination of the respondents that the petitioner is not entitled to a defense at the expense of the Town of Orangetown in an action entitled Sluys v Colello, Rockland … The Town Board of the Town of Orangetown adopted a resolution that the petitioner is not entitled to a defense at the expense of the Town in a taxpayers’ suit entitled Sluys v Colello, Rockland County Index No. 3335/95.

Brown v. New York City Housing Authority

27 A.D.3d 733 · Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · Mar 28, 2006

v New York State, 22 AD3d 503 [2005]; Matter of Sureway Towing, Inc. v Martinez, 8 AD3d 490 [2004]; Matter of Kilafofski v Blackburne, 201 AD2d 564 [1994]). … Auth., 271 AD2d 818, 819 [2000]; Matter of Ortiz v Franco, 259 AD2d 445 [1999]; Matter of Ortiz v New York City Hous. Auth., 245 AD2d 86, 86-87 [1997]; Matter of Simons v New York City Hous.

Weingarten v. Crime Victims Board

22 A.D.3d 763 · Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · Oct 24, 2005

v New York State Crime Victims Bd., 302 AD2d 380 [2003]). … (see Matter of Goldberg v Crime Victims Bd., 234 AD2d 370, 371 [1996]; Matter of Rigaud v Crime Victims Compensation Bd., 94 AD2d 602, 603 [1983]).

Brown v. Long Beach Lumber Co.

228 A.D. 790 · Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · Feb 15, 1930

People ex rel. Bruno v. Brown

19 A.D.3d 621 · Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · Jun 20, 2005

Zivyak v. Board of Education

282 A.D. 704 · Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · Jun 1, 1953

This notice was forwarded to and received in the office of the president of the board on August 17, 1951. … On December 26, 1951, the infant and his guardian were examined on the claim by the corporation counsel of the city of New York, who is also attorney for the board of education, and the file was marked “Board of Education

People v. Brown

136 A.D.2d 556 · Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · Jan 11, 1988

In addition, we find that when viewed in a light most favorable to the People (see, People v Contes, 60 NY2d 620 ), the evidence was legally sufficient to support the defendant’s conviction. … P., Brown, Lawrence and Sullivan, JJ., concur.

Brown v. LaFontaine-Rish Medical Associates

295 A.D.2d 167 · Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · Jun 13, 2002

The conflicting evidence raises material and triable issues of fact and thus precludes an award of summary judgment (see, Sillman v Twentieth Century-Fox Film Corp., 3 NY2d 395, 404 ).

People v. Brown

148 A.D.2d 625 · Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · Mar 20, 1989

Viewing the evidence adduced at trial in the light most favorable to the prosecution (see, People v Contes, 60 NY2d 620 ), we find it was legally sufficient to establish the defendant’s guilt.

Lawson v. Board of Education

35 A.D.2d 878 · Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · Nov 23, 1970

People v. Brown

149 A.D.2d 523 · Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · Apr 10, 1989

We note that the record amply supports the court’s holding that there existed an independent basis supporting the identifications by the prosecution witnesses (see, e.g., People v Fappiano, 139 AD2d 524, 525 , lv denied 72

Golomb v. Board of Education

92 A.D.2d 256 · Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · Mar 21, 1983

In this matter petitioner correctly argues, in essence, that by law (see Matter of Brown v Board of Educ., 42 AD2d 702, 703 ), her status as a probationary teacher was terminable only by the school district’s chancellor, … Toscano v McGoldrick, 300 NY 156 ; Matter of Rathbone v Board of Educ., supra).

People ex rel. Brown v. Griffin

123 A.D.3d 1281 · Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · Dec 11, 2014

The convictions were upheld upon direct appeal (People v Brown, 16 AD3d 430, 431 [2005], lv denied 4 NY3d 852 [2005]). … Brown v Artus, 64 AD3d 1064, 1064 [2009], lv denied 13 NY3d 709 [2009]; People ex rel. Franza v Lape, 61 AD3d 1200 [2009]). Lahtinen, J.P., McCarthy, Garry, Rose and Devine, JJ., concur.

Damino v. Board of Regents

124 A.D.2d 271 · Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · Oct 9, 1986

People v Wilson, 64 NY2d 634, 636 ; People v Rodriguez, 38 NY2d 95, 99 ). We also reject petitioner’s claim that he was denied the right to cross-examine patient "A”. … An administrative penalty will be set aside as excessive only when it is so disproportionate to the offense, in light of all the circumstances, as to be shocking to one’s sense of fairness (Matter of Pell v Board of Educ.

Rockwell v. Board of Education

214 A.D. 431 · Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · Nov 20, 1925

It is the custom of said board of education to make salary payments to teachers at the end of each month beginning in September and continuing for ten months, upon presentation of bills to said board by the teachers. … After Septem *433 ber 1, 1924, the date when the said Equal Pay Law went into effect, the respondent demanded of said board that her pay be made equal to that of said male teacher, which was refused by said board.

Spivack ex rel. Milton v. Brown

259 A.D.2d 488 · Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · Mar 1, 1999

(see, Allen v United States, 164 US 492 ) and directed the jury to continue its deliberations. … Therefore, the Supreme Court did not improvidently exercise its discretion in declaring a mistrial (see, Matter of Plummer v Rothwax, supra; People v Sparacino, supra). Bracken, J.