Case law

Opinions from 1658 to today.

Filtersnyappdiv

10,000+ results

1.43s

  • People v. Brown

    235 A.D.2d 429 · Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · Jan 13, 1997

    By decision and order dated October 31, 1994, this Court modified the judgment by vacating the sentence imposed (People v Brown, 208 AD2d 941 ). … By order dated July 2, 1996, the Court of Appeals reversed the decision and order of this Court and remitted the matter to this Court for a determination of the remaining issue (People v Brown, 88 NY2d 944 ).

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • Wallace v. Environmental Control Board

    8 A.D.3d 78 · Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · Jun 10, 2004

    Judgment, Supreme Court, New York County (Ira Gammerman, J.), entered March 17, 1999, which denied petitioner’s application to annul respondent Environmental Control Board’s determination that petitioner was guilty of vending

    Cited 7 timesPublished
  • Mulheren v. Board of Trustees

    307 A.D.2d 129 · Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · Jun 17, 2003

    Petitioner’s medical records and the reports of the Medical Board constitute “some credible evidence” that petitioner is not disabled by reason of any orthopedic injuries or cognitive deficits (see Matter of Guzman v Safir … and to the judgment of the Board of Trustees in adopting the Medical Board’s findings (see Matter of Borenstein v New York City Employees’ Retirement Sys., 88 NY2d 756, 761 [1996]), even though the Social Security Administration

    Cited 12 timesPublished
  • People v. Brown

    217 A.D.2d 586 · Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · Jul 10, 1995

    Application *587 by the appellant for a writ of error coram nobis to vacate a decision and order of this Court dated May 29, 1990 (People v Brown, 161 AD2d 778 ), affirming a judgment of the County Court, Nassau County, rendered … The defendant has failed to establish that he was denied the effective assistance of appellate counsel (see, Jones v Barnes, 463 US 745 ). Mangano, P. J., Sullivan, Balletta and Thompson, JJ., concur.

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • People v. Brown

    233 A.D.2d 931 · Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · Nov 8, 1996

    Judgment unanimously affirmed (see, People v Saunders, 190 AD2d 1092, 1093 , lv denied 81 NY2d 1019 ). (Appeal from Judgment of Erie County Court, McCarthy, J.—Attempted Reckless Endangerment, 1st Degree.)

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • Brown v. Neely

    277 A.D.2d 1126 · Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · Dec 11, 1950

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • Bertman v. Board of Managers

    233 A.D.2d 283 · Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · Nov 4, 1996

    Corp., 184 AD2d 556, 557 ; see also, Boyko v Limowski, 223 AD2d 962 ; Marcellus v Littauer Hosp. Assn., 145 AD2d 680 ). … Barterama Corp., 218 AD2d 643 ; Kennerly v Campbell Chain Co., 133 AD2d 669 ; Frierson v Concourse Plaza Assocs., 189 AD2d 609 ).

    Cited 20 timesPublished
  • Welch v. Board of Education

    287 A.D.2d 761 · Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · Oct 4, 2001

    of Scuteri v Watkins Glen Cent. … of Krohn v Berne-Knox *763 Westerlo Cent.

    Cited 19 timesPublished
  • People v. Brown

    230 A.D.2d 749 · Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · Aug 5, 1996

    The record supports the hearing court’s determination that the police interaction with the defendant was justified in its inception and reasonably limited in scope in response to the circumstances presented (see, People v … Prochilo, 41 NY2d 759 ; People v Ingle, 36 NY2d 413 ; People v Robinson, 74 NY2d 773 ).

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • Villareal v. Brown

    229 A.D.2d 588 · Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · Jul 29, 1996

    Adjudged that the petition is granted, without costs or disbursements, and the indictment is dismissed for reasons stated in Matter of Maltz v Clabby ( 229 AD2d 580 [decided herewith]). O’Brien, J.

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • Shoulders v. Brown

    224 A.D.2d 961 · Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · Feb 2, 1996

    Same Memorandum as in Shoulders v Brown ( 224 AD2d 960 [decided herewith]). (Appeal from Order of Supreme Court, Onondaga County, Elliott, J.— Reargument.) Present — Pine, J. P., Lawton, Wesley, Davis and Boehm, JJ.

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • Brown v. Aran

    229 A.D.2d 1025 · Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · Jul 12, 1996

    Same Memorandum as in Downes v Aran ( 229 AD2d 1025 [decided herewith]). (Appeal from Judgment of Supreme Court, Queens County, Rutledge, J.—Summary Judgment.) Present—Green, J. P., Lawton, Wesley, Doerr and Boehm, JJ.

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • GILLIS, JACQUE R. v. BROWN, RODNEY C.

    133 A.D.3d 1374 · Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · Nov 20, 2015

    GILLIS, PLAINTIFF-APPELLANT-RESPONDENT, V MEMORANDUM AND ORDER RODNEY C. BROWN, DEBORAH A. … Although that regulation is sufficiently specific to support liability under section 241 (6) (see Lopez v Fahs Constr. Group, Inc., 129 AD3d 1478, 1479; Frank v Meadowlakes Dev.

    Cited 8 timesPublished
  • Brown v. Larry

    232 A.D.2d 758 · Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · Oct 17, 1996

    arose from his acknowledgment of paternity and not from any wrongdoing on respondents’ part, we reject petitioner’s argument that he is entitled to reimbursement under the principles of equity (compare, Matter of Reynolds v … [Barbara A.] v Gregory B., 229 AD2d 801 ). Cardona, P. J., Mercure, Casey and Peters, JJ., concur. Ordered that the order is affirmed, without costs.

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • People v. Brown

    223 A.D.2d 721 · Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · Jan 29, 1996

    , 176 NY 84, 94 ; People v *722 Caban, 120 AD2d 603 ). … Its determination should be accorded great weight on appeal and should not be disturbed unless clearly unsupported by the record (see, People v Garafolo, 44 AD2d 86, 88 ).

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • Polin v. Brown Memorial Baptist Church

    295 A.D.2d 589 · Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · Jun 24, 2002

    The plaintiffs commenced this action to recover damages arising from their purchase of real property from the defendant Brown Memorial Baptist Church (hereinafter the Church). … LoPreste, 278 AD2d 198 ; Grammer v Turits, 271 AD2d 644 ; McManus v Moise, 262 AD2d 370 ; Houlihan/Lawrence, Inc. v Duval, 228 AD2d 560 ; London v Courduff, 141 AD2d 803 ).

    Cited 1 timesPublished
  • People v. Brown

    221 A.D.2d 1023 · Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · Nov 15, 1995

    —Judgment unanimously affirmed (see, People v Saunders, 190 AD2d 1092, 1093 , *1024 lv denied 81 NY2d 1019 ). (Appeal from Judgment of Erie County Court, D’Amico, J.—Assault, 2nd Degree.) Present— Denman, P.

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • Brown v. Coombe

    222 A.D.2d 1122 · Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · Dec 22, 1995

    —Determination unanimously confirmed without costs and petition dismissed (see, Matter of Rand v Herbert, 219 AD2d 878 ). (CPLR art 78 Proceeding Transferred by Order of Supreme Court, Wyoming County, Dadd, J.)

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • Worthington v. Planning Board

    131 A.D.2d 466 · Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · Jun 1, 1987

    The section also states that before establishing an open development area the matter shall be referred by the town board to the planning board for its advice. … area, as well as the authority of the Planning Board to approve or disapprove subdivision plats (see, SRW Assocs. v Town Bd., 121 AD2d 713 ; 1979 Opns Atty Gen 147-148).

    Cited 1 timesPublished
  • People v. Brown

    222 A.D.2d 270 · Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · Dec 12, 1995

    Defendant’s claim that the prosecutor and the investigating detective improperly bolstered the testimony of the complainant, to the extent preserved (see, People v Ortiz, 217 AD2d 425 , Iv denied 86 NY2d 799 ), was raised … and rejected on the codefendant’s appeal (People v Hall, 220 AD2d 278 ), and we see no reason to depart from those rulings.

    Cited 0 timesPublished

Ask Donna

Ask Donna

A word about cookies

We need a few to keep you signed in and the library working. The rest help us see which pages people use and where they get stuck. They stay off unless you say yes.