Case law

People v. Brown

275 A.D.2d 376 · Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · Aug 14, 2000

Viewing the evidence in the light most favorable to the prosecution (see, People v Contes, 60 NY2d 620 ), we find that it was legally sufficient to establish the defendant’s guilt beyond a reasonable doubt. … The sentence imposed was not excessive (see, People v Suitte, 90 AD2d 80, 85-86 ). The defendant’s remaining contentions are either unpre *377 served for appellate review (CPLR 470.05 [2]), or without merit. Ritter, J.

People v. Brown

68 A.D.3d 890 · Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · Dec 8, 2009

Counsel’s application for leave to withdraw as counsel is granted (see Anders v California, 386 US 738 [1967]; People v Paige, 54 AD2d 631 [1976]; cf. People v Gonzalez, 47 NY2d 606 [1979]).

People v. Brown

56 A.D.2d 793 · Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · Nov 25, 2008

Counsel’s application for leave to withdraw as counsel is granted (see Anders v California, 386 US 738 [1967]; People v Paige, 54 AD2d 631 [1976]; cf. People v Gonzalez, Al NY2d 606 [1979]).

Brown v. Goord

270 A.D.2d 857 · Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · Mar 29, 2000

The misbehavior report, augmented by the testimony of the correction officer, constitutes substantial evidence supporting the determination (see, Matter of Foster v Coughlin, 76 NY2d 964, 966 ; Matter of Perez v Wilmot, 67 … Matter of Rivera v *858 Goord, 255 AD2d 995 ).

People v. Brown

276 A.D.2d 707 · Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · Oct 23, 2000

Application by the appellant for a writ of error coram nobis to vacate, on the ground of ineffective assistance of appellate counsel, a decision and order of this Court dated May 3, 1999 (People v Brown, 261 AD2d 410 ), affirming … The appellant has failed to establish that he was denied the *708 effective assistance of appellate counsel (see, Jones v Barnes, 463 US 745 ). Ritter, J. P., Friedmann, McGinity and Smith, JJ., concur.

People ex rel. Brown v. Purdy

186 A.D. 54 · Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · Jan 10, 1919

(Barber v. Woolf, 216 N. Y. 7 .) The act provided for the method of assessing these damages back on' the property benefited (the land in the street from which the easements had been relieved).

People v. Brown

66 A.D.3d 915 · Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · Oct 20, 2009

Counsel’s application for leave to withdraw as counsel is granted (see Anders v California, 386 US 738 [1967]; People v Paige, 54 AD2d 631 [1976]; cf. People v Gonzalez, 47 NY2d 606 [1979]).

People v. Brown

269 A.D.2d 823 · Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · Feb 16, 2000

We re *824 versed that resentence because defendant was absent therefrom (People v Brown, 261 AD2d 890 ).

Sanchez v. Brown

269 A.D.2d 455 · Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · Feb 14, 2000

Subsequent to the petitioner’s 1986 murder conviction (see, People v Sanchez, 167 AD2d 489 ), he commenced this CPLR article 78 proceeding to obtain the District Attorney’s casefile. … of Key v Hynes, 205 AD2d 779 ; Matter of Calvin K. v De Francesco, 200 AD2d 619 ).

Brown v. DeBicki

275 A.D.2d 883 · Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · Sep 29, 2000

Thus, the Interim County Committee was required to file its rules with the State Board of Elections (see, Election Law § 2-114 [1]; Matter of Bertan v O’Neill, 83 AD2d 984 , lv denied 54 NY2d 603 ; see also, Matter of Leirer … v Suffolk County Comm. of Conservative Party of N.

Brown & Williamson Tobacco Corp. v. Wigand

228 A.D.2d 187 · Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · Jun 6, 1996

Plaintiff Brown and Williamson Tobacco Corporation ("B&W”) has failed to overcome the qualified protection enjoyed by deponents-respondents concerning their newsgathering activities.

People v. Brown

68 A.D.3d 602 · Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · Dec 22, 2009

The verdict was based on legally sufficient evidence and was not against the weight of the evidence (see People v Danielson, 9 NY3d 342, 348-349 [2007]). … The fact that the jury *603 acquitted defendant of a possession count does not warrant a different result (see People v Rayam, 94 NY2d 557 [2000]), particularly since that count was based on the testimony of an officer who

People v. Brown

66 A.D.3d 748 · Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · Oct 13, 2009

and a failure to accept responsibility need not be addressed since there was a sufficient basis to designate him a level three sex offender based upon the 115 points assessed for factors he does not contest (see People v … Murphy, 33 AD3d 778 [2006]; People v Lombard, 30 AD3d 573 [2006]).

Brown v. City Sam Restaurants, Inc.

246 A.D.2d 301 · Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · Jan 6, 1998

foods earlier that day, that he had a known food allergy to some shellfish, that no one else in his dinner party became sick, and where his own medical evidence was inconclusive as to the cause of his symptoms (see, Valenti v … Tea Co., 207 AD2d 340 ; Pendola v M. & S. Cafeteria, 206 Misc 595 ).

People v. Brown

268 A.D.2d 369 · Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · Jan 25, 2000

(See, Anders v California, 386 US 738 ; People v Saunders, 52 AD2d 833 .)

Jennings v. Board of Elections

32 A.D.3d 486 · Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · Aug 16, 2006

of Krueger v Richards, 59 NY2d 680, 682 [1983]; Matter of Green v Mahr, 231 AD2d 480 [1996]). … Board of Elections of City of N.Y., 297 AD2d 355 [2002]; Matter of Green v Mahr, supra).

BROWN, ADRIAN, PEOPLE v

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · Dec 23, 2016

THE PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK, RESPONDENT, V MEMORANDUM AND ORDER ADRIAN BROWN, DEFENDANT-APPELLANT. FRANK H. … Montanez, 135 AD3d 528, 528, lv denied 27 NY3d 1072; People v Magin, 1 AD3d 1024, 1025; see generally People v Rivera, 259 AD2d 316, 316-317).

Brown v. City of New York

80 A.D.2d 596 · Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · Feb 17, 1981

Grand, Inc. v City of New York, 32 NY2d 300, 304 ; Schwartz v Public Administrator of County of Bronx, 24 NY2d 65, 71 ; Read v Sacco, 49 AD2d 471, 473 ). … The defendants, through the State, had a full and fair opportunity to litigate the issue of probable cause in the criminal proceeding (see Irizarry v City of New York, 79 Misc 2d 346 ).

Brown v. Boucaud

66 A.D.3d 1109 · Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · Oct 8, 2009

Gill v Greene, 12 NY3d 1, 4 [2009]; People ex rel. Nadal v Rivera, 63 AD3d 1434 [2009]; People ex rel. Lopez v Yelich, 63 AD3d 1433 *1110 [2009]; People ex rel. Driscoll v LaClair, 63 AD3d 1364 [2009]). … Taylor v Brown, 62 AD3d 1063, 1064 [2009]). Supreme Court’s judgment is therefore reversed and the petition is dismissed. Peters, J.P, Spain, Rose, Kane and Stein, JJ., concur.

Kumar v. Brown

269 A.D.2d 360 · Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · Feb 7, 2000

—In an action pursuant to RPAPL article 15 to compel the determination of claims to real property, the defendants Kenn Brown and B.C.A. … Co., 60 NY2d 693 ; *361 Windsor Metal Fabrications v Fireman’s Fund Ins.