Case law

Grossman v. Planning Board

126 A.D.2d 887 · Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · Jan 22, 1987

Board of Zoning Appeals of Inc. … Town Law § 274-a enables a town board to authorize a planning board to review and approve site plans.

People ex rel. Brown v. Keane

284 A.D.2d 813 · Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · Jun 28, 2001

Rada v Goord, 274 AD2d 795 ; Matter of Medina v Senkowski, 242 AD2d 762 ). … Kaplan v Commissioner of Correction of City of N. Y., 60 NY2d 648 ). Spain, Carpinello, Mugglin and Rose, JJ., concur. Ordered that the judgment is affirmed, without costs.

Small v. Village Board

37 A.D.3d 839 · Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · Feb 27, 2007

Matter of Lee v Board of Educ. of Pelham Union Free School Dist., 90 AD2d 775 [1982]). … Safety, 267 AD2d 241 [1999]; Matter of Sigle v Slavin, 161 AD2d 644 [1990]; Matter of Collins v Amrhein, 134 AD2d 346, 347-348 [1987]). Mastro, J.E, Fisher, Angiolillo and McCarthy, JJ., concur.

People v. Brown

81 A.D.3d 659 · Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · Feb 1, 2011

Negron, 78 AD3d 1079 [2010]; People v Ragbirsingh, 78 AD3d 738 [2010]; People v Misla, 78 AD3d 735 [2010]; People v Ware, 78 AD3d 743 [2010]; People v Pruitt, 74 AD3d 1366, 1367 [2010]; People v Tillman, 74 AD3d 1251 [2010 … ]; People v Mendez, 73 AD3d 951 [2010]; People v Murrell, 73 AD3d 598 [2010], lv granted 15 NY3d 854 [2010]; People v Parisi, 72 AD3d 989 [2010], lv granted 15 NY3d 776 [2010]; People v Becker, 72 AD3d 1290, 1291 [2010];

Brown v. City of New York

275 A.D.2d 726 · Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · Sep 18, 2000

v City of New York, 246 AD2d 568 ). … Therefore, that branch of the City’s motion pursuant to CPLR 4404 which was to set aside the verdict and for judgment as a matter of law dismissing the complaint was properly denied (see, Ziecker v Town of Orchard Park, 75

People v. Brown

81 A.D.3d 1389 · Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · Feb 10, 2011

Counsel’s motion to be relieved of assignment granted (see People v Crawford, 71 AD2d 38 [1979]). (Appeal from Judgment of Monroe County Court, Alex R.

Brown v. Soldiers & Sailors Memorial Hospital

193 A.D.2d 1077 · Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · May 28, 1993

Africano, 132 AD2d 935 ; Maust v Arseneau, 116 AD2d 1012 ). … Joel Pasternack; plaintiff failed to meet his burden in opposition by submitting an expert’s affidavit raising an issue of fact (see, Bills v Africano, supra; Maust v Arseneau, supra).

Brown v. City of New York

105 A.D.3d 420 · Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · Apr 2, 2013

Plaintiff provided a reasonable excuse for his failure to appear for trial—namely, that he was incarcerated (see Jackson v New York City Auth., 259 AD2d 383 [1st Dept 1999]). … Further, plaintiffs prior successful defense of defendant’s summary judgment motion demonstrated merit to this action (see Stephenson v Hotel Empls. & Rest. Empls.

People ex rel. Brown v. Walters

84 A.D.2d 852 · Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · Nov 30, 1981

Gonzales v Dalsheim, 52 NY2d 9, 15-16 ; Matter of Higgins v New York State Div. of Parole, 72 AD2d 583 ). … Gonzales v Dalshiem ( 52 NY2d 9, 15 , supra), the compact between New York and New Jersey for out-of-State parole supervision (Executive Law, § 259-m et seq.; NJ Stat Ann, § 2A:168-14 et seq.), while containing explicit provisions

Vergata v. Town Board

209 A.D.2d 527 · Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · Nov 14, 1994

An applicant for a special use permit must establish that the proposed use complies in all other respects with the zoning ordinance (see, Matter of Tandem Holding Corp. v Board of Zoning Appeals, 43 NY2d 801, 802 ; Multi-State … Developers v Incorporated Vil. of Great Neck, 149 AD2d 414 ; Matter of CBS Realty v Noto, 139 AD2d 645 ).

Herzog v. Planning Board

281 A.D.2d 419 · Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · Mar 5, 2001

The determination of the Planning Board of East Hampton (hereinafter the Planning Board) was not arbitrary or capricious and is supported by substantial evidence (see, Matter of Khan v Zoning Bd. of Appeals, 87 NY2d 344 ; … Matter of Cowan v Kern, 41 NY2d 591 ).

Brown v. Addison Hall Owners Corp.

135 A.D.3d 603 · Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · Jan 21, 2016

plaintiff slipped and fell is sufficient under the circumstances of this case to defeat summary judgement at this time, with the specific spoliation sanction, if any, to be determined at trial (see Pegasus Aviation I, Inc. v … Lorenzo v Plitt Theatres, 267 AD2d 54, 56 [1st Dept 1999]).

Brown v. Visan Fuel Oil Co.

114 A.D.2d 396 · Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · Oct 15, 1985

Center, 64 NY2d 851, 853 ; see, Friends of Animals v *397 Associated Fur Mfrs., 46 NY2d 1065, 1067 ). In the instant case, the defendants have failed to meet their burden. … Under these circumstances, we need not reach the issue of the sufficiency of the plaintiffs’ opposing papers (see, Winegrad v New York Univ. Med. Center, supra). Brown, J. P., Rubin, Lawrence and Hooper, JJ., concur.

People v. Brown

79 A.D.3d 1811 · Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · Dec 30, 2010

It is hereby ordered that said appeal is unanimously dismissed as moot (see People v Rollins, 50 AD3d 1535, 1536 [2008], Iv denied 10 NY3d 939 [2008]). Present — Centra, J.P, Peradotto, Garni and Sconiers, JJ.

People ex rel. Hall v. Brown

74 A.D.3d 1596 · Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · Jun 17, 2010

Funches v Walsh, 48 AD3d 849, 849 [2008], appeal denied 10 NY3d 707 [2008]; People ex rel. Flax v Donelli, 43 AD3d 1259 , 1260 [2007], appeal dismissed 9 NY3d 1029 [2008]). … Spaulding v Woods, 63 AD3d 1456, 1457 [2009]; People ex rel. Funches v Walsh, 48 AD3d at 849 ). Peters, J.P., Spain, Lahtinen, Stein and Egan Jr., JJ., concur. Ordered that the judgment is affirmed, without costs.

C. W. Brown, Inc. v. Canton

216 A.D.2d 841 · Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · Jun 29, 1995

Corp. v State of New York, 200 AD2d 294, 296 ; see, Matter of Pell v Board of Educ., 34 NY2d 222 , 231). … Board of Educ., supra, at 231).

Brown v. Beautiful Village Redevelopment Associates

110 A.D.3d 567 · Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · Oct 24, 2013

Brown v. City of New York

251 A.D.2d 361 · Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · Jun 8, 1998

v City of New York, 243 AD2d 629 ). … v City of New York, 234 AD2d 114 ; Touti v City of New York, 233 AD2d 496 ).

Janas v. Town Board

51 A.D.2d 473 · Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · Apr 15, 1976

Bank v Board of Zoning Appeals of Town of Hempstead, 281 NY 534 ). … Article V, section 2, part E, specifically sets forth five criteria upon which any action of the board of appeals must be based.

Ocean Hill-Brownsville Governing Board v. Board of Education

30 A.D.2d 447 · Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · Oct 24, 1968

Where the statute contains no such conditions, neither notice, nor charges, nor opportunity to be heard are necessary (Eckloff v. District of Columbia, 135 U. S. 240 ; People ex rel. Gere v. Whitlock, 92 N. … It is not to be supposed that the Legislature will deliberately place words in a statute which are intended to serve no purpose (People v. Dethloff, 283 N. Y. 309 ).