Case law

Brown & Son Realty, Inc. v. Greenberg

195 A.D.2d 583 · Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · Jul 26, 1993

Woodward, 259 NY 149, 150 ; Egan Real Estate v McGraw, 40 AD2d 299, 303 ; cf., Sheppard Intl. v Vogel, 147 AD2d 351 ; Interactive Props. v Doyle Dane Bernbach, 125 AD2d 265 , lv denied 70 NY2d 613 ). … We have examined the plaintiffs remaining contention and find it to be without merit (see, Houlihan-Parnes v Citibank, 49 NY2d 761 ; Pelton Co. v Moundsville Shopping Plaza, 173 AD2d 201 ). Bracken, J.

Tonery v. Planning Board

256 A.D.2d 1097 · Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · Dec 31, 1998

Neighborhood Assn. v Town Bd., 106 AD2d 868, 870 , appeal dismissed 66 NY2d 896 , citing H.O.M.E.S. v New York *1098 State Urban Dev. Corp., 69 AD2d 222, 232 ). … Scrivani, 97 AD2d 769, 771 ; see also, Leibring v Planning Bd., 144 AD2d 903 ).

People ex rel. Brown v. Baker

284 A.D. 106 · Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · May 19, 1954

(People v. Brous, 296 N. Y. 1028 ; People v. Costello, 182 App. Div. 341 ; People v. Chambers, 189 Misc. 502 .) … Trainor v. Baker, 89 N. Y. 460, 465 ; People ex rel. Allen v. Hagan, 170 N. Y. 46, 52 ; People ex rel. Wolosky v. McDonnell, 116 N. Y. S. 2d 387, affd. 280 App. Div. 914 ; People ex rel. Wojek v.

Brown v. City of New York

92 A.D.2d 15 · Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · Feb 24, 1983

(Emphasis added; see Broughton v State of New York, supra.) Our case is no different. … Even if the police investigation of Brown’s *20 alleged alibi raised a question as to whether he was elsewhere at the time of the alleged offense, there was a reasonable basis for arrest and prosecution in view of the victim

Brown v. Bronson

100 N.Y.S. 1106 · Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · Jul 12, 1906

Judgment affirmed, with costs, on the authority of Brown v. Bronson, 93 App. Div. 312 , 87 N. Y. Supp. 872 . Order filed.

deSousa v. Dayton T. Brown, Inc.

280 A.D.2d 447 · Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · Feb 5, 2001

The co-worker’s acts were not of such an extraordinary nature or so attenuated from the statutory violation as to constitute a superseding cause sufficient to relieve the defendant of liability (see, Mooney v PCM Dev. … Co., 238 AD2d 487 ; see also, Gordon v Eastern Ry. Supply, 82 NY2d 555 ). Ritter, J. P., Altman, H. Miller .and Schmidt, JJ., concur.

Vermont Equity & Funding Corp. v. Brown

2025 NY Slip Op 00900 · Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · Feb 13, 2025

Vermont Equity & Funding Corp. v Brown ( 2025 NY Slip Op 00900 ) Vermont Equity & Funding Corp. v Brown 2025 NY Slip Op 00900 Decided on February 13, 2025 Appellate Division, Second Department Published by New York State … Brown had sole authority to enter into the subject note and mortgage agreement on behalf of the defendant ( see 334 Corp. v Jericho Plaza, LLC , 128 AD3d at 680 ; see also Lucky's Real Estate Group, LLC v Powell , 189 AD3d

Countrywide Home Loans, Inc. v. Brown

305 A.D.2d 626 · Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · May 27, 2003

—In an action to foreclose a mortgage, the defendant Wendy Brown appeals, as limited by her brief, from so much of an order of the Supreme Court, Nassau County (McCarty, J.), entered December 2, 2002, as granted the plaintiffs … The appellant’s simple denial of receipt was insufficient to rebut this presumption of delivery (see Sansone v Cavallaro, 284 AD2d 817 [2001]). The appellant’s remaining contentions are without merit.

Kingsland v. Industrial Brown Hoist Co.

136 A.D.2d 901 · Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · Jan 29, 1988

The bridge was manufactured and installed by defendant Industrial Brown Hoist Co. in 1904 for plaintiff’s employer, Hanna Furnace Corp. (Hanna). … Hanna had no contact of any kind with Industrial Brown Hoist Co. or its successor in interest, American Hoist and Derrick Co. since 1968.

People v. Brown

85 A.D.3d 1196 · Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · Jun 28, 2011

Application by the appellant for a writ of error coram nobis to vacate, on the ground of ineffective assistance of appellate counsel, a decision and order of this Court dated March 24, 2009 (People v Brown, 60 AD3d 962 [2009 … The appellant has failed to establish that he was denied the effective assistance of appellate counsel (see Jones v Barnes, 463 US 745 [1983]; People v Stultz, 2 NY3d 277 [2004]).

People ex rel. Brown v. Brophy

239 A.D. 809 · Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · Apr 15, 1933

People ex rel. Brown v. Martin

2 A.D.2d 826 · Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · Sep 12, 1956

Brown v. German Sick & Aid Society

27 A.D. 632 · Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · Jul 1, 1898

Capizzi v. Brown Chiari LLP

2021 NY Slip Op 02956 · Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · May 7, 2021

Capizzi v Brown Chiari LLP ( 2021 NY Slip Op 02956 ) Capizzi v Brown Chiari LLP 2021 NY Slip Op 02956 Decided on May 7, 2021 Appellate Division, Fourth Department Published by New York State Law Reporting Bureau pursuant … CAPIZZI, PLAINTIFF-RESPONDENT, v BROWN CHIARI LLP, JAMES E. BROWN AND DONALD P. CHIARI, DEFENDANTS-APPELLANTS. (APPEAL NO. 1.) RUPP BAASE PFALZGRAF CUNNINGHAM LLC, BUFFALO (R.

People v. Brown

84 A.D.3d 525 · Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · May 12, 2011

Application by appellant’s counsel to withdraw as counsel is granted (see Anders v California, 386 US 738 [1967]; People v Saunders, 52 AD2d 833 [1976]).

Brown v. 39 Spring St. LLC

2025 NY Slip Op 00905 · Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · Feb 18, 2025

Brown v 39 Spring St. LLC ( 2025 NY Slip Op 00905 ) Brown v 39 Spring St. … Brown, Plaintiff-Appellant, v 39 Spring Street LLC et al., Defendants-Respondents. Law Offices of Bernard D'Orazio & Associates, P.C., New York (Bernard D'Orazio of counsel), for appellant.

Brown v. Egriu

76 A.D.2d 799 · Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · Aug 20, 2010

We also reject petitioner’s contention that the court erred in relying upon the alleged number of signatures validated by the State Board inasmuch as the State Board had not yet issued its determination at the time of the … the State Board determined to be valid (see generally Matter of Segarra v Doe, 9 AD2d 604 [1959]; Matter of Rauch v Cohen, 268 App Div 879 [1944]).

Prospero v. R. Brown & Sons, Inc.

110 A.D.2d 250 · Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · Oct 10, 1985

Suzuki Motor Corp., supra, at p 412; see also, Voss v Black & Decker Mfg. Co., 59 NY2d 102,106 ). … This court affirmed Special Term (Di Prospero v Ford Motor Co., 87 AD2d 697 ). Defendant’s claim against Ford, however, remains viable (Di Prospero v Ford Motor Co., 105 AD2d 479 ).

Brown v. Western Union Telegraph Co.

26 A.D.2d 316 · Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · Oct 27, 1966

of the events at the time of their occurrence or soon thereafter and asserts that the contents of the writing are accurate, the writing may be received as evidence, although there is no present recollection of the event (Brown … v.

Brown v. Guichard

79 N.Y.S. 1127 · Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · Dec 5, 1902