Case law

Brown v. Rivera

299 A.D.2d 617 · Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · Nov 7, 2002

Recore, 271 AD2d 778, 778 , quoting Matter of Gonzalez v Wilson, 106 AD2d 386, 386-387 ; see Matter of Peana v Recore, 257 AD2d 862, 863 ). … v Goord, 290 AD2d 901, 902 ).

People v. Brown

91 A.D.3d 989 · Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · Jan 5, 2012

III sex offender before Supreme Court, defendant’s claim that the court’s order adopting that classification was not adequately supported by findings of fact and conclusions of law is not properly before us (see People v

Brown v. State of New York

52 A.D.3d 1136 · Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · Jun 26, 2008

State of New York, 299 AD2d 675, 675 [2002] [citation omitted]; accord Matter of Robinson v State of New York, 35 AD3d 948, 949 [2006]). … State of New York, 299 AD2d at 675 ; see Matter of P.A. v State of New York, 277 AD2d 671, 672 [2000]).

Title Guarantee & Trust Co. v. Brown

136 A.D. 843 · Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · Mar 18, 1910

creditor, so that the application will show upon its face that the pi’oceeding was authorized by the owner of the judgment,- unless the affidavit is inade by the attorney for a party, when authority will be presumed, (Miller v. … The case, is directly within the rule stated in Brown v. Walker ( 8 N. Y. Supp. 59 ; affd., without opinion, 121 N. Y. 717 .)

Brown v. Window King LLC

2024 NY Slip Op 00857 · Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · Feb 20, 2024

Brown v Window King LLC ( 2024 NY Slip Op 00857 ) Brown v Window King LLC 2024 NY Slip Op 00857 Decided on February 20, 2024 Appellate Division, First Department Published by New York State Law Reporting Bureau pursuant to … Index No. 21071/18, 43423/18, 43270/19, 433324/19 Appeal No. 1597 Case No. 2022-05761 [*1]Mary Elena Brown, Plaintiff-Respondent, v Window King LLC, et al., Defendants-Respondents, Stillman Management Inc., Defendant-Appellant

People v. Brown

90 A.D.3d 1596 · Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · Dec 30, 2011

Memorandum: In People v Brown ( 72 AD3d 1558 [2010]), we previously affirmed the judgment convicting defendant following a bench trial of, inter alia, assault in the second degree (Penal Law § 120.05 [4]), i.e., reckless … Court of Appeals, is not against the weight of the evidence (see generally People v Bleakley, 69 NY2d 490, 495 [1987]).

Brown, Harris, Stevens, Inc. v. Rosenberg

156 A.D.2d 249 · Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · Dec 14, 1989

The function of the court on a motion for summary judgment is issue finding and not issue determination (Esteve v Abad, 271 App Div 725 ). … Contrary to defendants’ contentions, sufficient issues of fact exist as to whether plaintiff was the procuring cause of the sale (Greene v Heilman, 51 NY2d 197 ) so as to require a trial. Concur—Sullivan, J.

People v. Brown

299 A.D.2d 292 · Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · Nov 26, 2002

Viewed most favorably to defendant, a reasonable view of the evidence supports that defense (see People v Lam Lek Chong, 45 NY2d 64, 74-75 , cert denied 439 US 935 ).

People v. Brown

297 A.D.2d 820 · Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · Sep 30, 2002

The appellant has failed to establish that he was denied the effective assistance of appellate counsel (see Jones v Barnes, 463 US 745 ). Florio, J.P., Feuerstein, Smith and Krausman, JJ., concur.

People v. Brown

293 A.D.2d 376 · Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · Apr 23, 2002

of credibility, including the conflict between the complainant’s and defendant’s versions of the incident, were properly considered by the jury and there is no basis upon which to disturb its determinations (see, People v

Claim of Brown v. American Ballet Theatre

13 A.D.3d 797 · Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · Dec 9, 2004

Notably, the Board has broad discretion to consider or reject a late application for review (see Matter of Reillo v Energy Saver Insulation Corp., 306 AD2d 775, 776 [2003]). … Accordingly, we do not find that the Board abused its discretion in denying claimant’s application as untimely (see Matter of Warren v Gallant Knight Sec., 301 AD2d 854 [2003]; Matter of Velasquez v Tony’s Taxi, 288 AD2d

People v. Brown

297 A.D.2d 748 · Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · Sep 23, 2002

; see also People v White, 73 NY2d 468, 473 , cert denied sub nom. … White v New York, 493 US 859 ; People v Saunders, 166 AD2d 546 ). The defendant’s remaining contentions are without merit. Florio, J.P., S. Miller, Crane and Mastro, JJ., concur.

C.W. Brown, Inc. v. HCE, Inc.

8 A.D.3d 520 · Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · Jun 21, 2004

CPLR 3217 (a) (2) requires, for a discontinuation by stipulation, a writing signed by the attorneys of record for all parties (see Barker v Barker, 295 AD2d 151 [2002]; Bove v Cherney, 252 AD2d 512 [1998]). … We do not necessarily embrace the holding of the Appellate Division, Third Department case on which SICS relies, Barclays Bank of N.Y. v M & M Elecs.

Interboro Mutual Indemnity Insurance v. Brown

300 A.D.2d 660 · Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · Dec 30, 2002

Where an insured is required to provide notice as soon as practicable, such notice must be given within a reasonable time under all the circumstances (see Sayed v Macari, 296 AD2d 396 ). … v State Farm Ins.

Brown v. Peninsula Hospital Center

64 A.D.2d 685 · Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · Jul 31, 1978

People v. Brown

290 A.D.2d 559 · Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · Jan 28, 2002

Application by the appellant for a writ of error coram nobis to vacate, on the ground of ineffective assistance of appellate counsel, a decision and order of this Court dated May 7, 2001 (People v Brown, 283 AD2d 437 ), affirming … Ordered that the application is denied. *560 The appellant has failed, to establish that he was denied the effective assistance of appellate counsel (see, Jones v Barnes, 463 US 745 ). Ritter, Acting P.J., McGinity, H.

People v. Brown

298 A.D.2d 927 · Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · Oct 1, 2002

People v Sabari, 280 AD2d 942 ). … Lopez ( 71 NY2d 662, 666 )” (People v Toxey, 86 NY2d 725, 726 , rearg denied 86 NY2d 839 ).

Brown v. University of Rochester

2024 NY Slip Op 01134 · Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · Feb 29, 2024

Brown v University of Rochester ( 2024 NY Slip Op 01134 ) Brown v University of Rochester 2024 NY Slip Op 01134 Decided on February 29, 2024 Appellate Division, Third Department Published by New York State Law Reporting Bureau … Decided and Entered:February 29, 2024 534967 [*1]Rebekah Brown, Respondent, v University of Rochester et al., Defendants, and Delta Kappa Epsilon, Appellant.

People v. Brown

295 A.D.2d 530 · Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · Jun 17, 2002

Appellate review of the issue raised by the defendant was effectively waived by him as a part of his plea agreement (see People v Callahan, 80 NY2d 273 ; People v Seaberg, 74 NY2d 1 ).

BROWN, DENNIS T. v. MAOUAD, BRIAN

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · Mar 18, 2016

BROWN, HOLDER OF 25% OF ALL OUTSTANDING SHARES OF LOGISTIC DYNAMICS, INC., PETITIONER-APPELLANT, V ORDER BRIAN MAOUAD, JAD MAOUAD AND NADY MAOUAD, RESPONDENTS-RESPONDENTS