Case law

Brown v. Berman

96 A.D.3d 894 · Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · Jun 20, 2012

Bergstol, 18 AD3d 411, 412 [2005]; see Northern Westchester Professional Park Assoc. v Town of Bedford, 60 NY2d 492, 499 [1983]; McGuire v McGuire, 93 AD3d at 703 ). … Owners Corp. v Celestial Church of Christ, Ileri Oluwa Parish, 94 AD3d 1033, 1034 [2012]; Marjam Supply Co., Inc. v All Craft Fabricators, Inc., 94 AD3d 954 [2012]; Hamilton v Blackwood, 85 AD3d 1116 [2011]).

People v. Brown

96 A.D.3d 1236 · Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · Jun 21, 2012

brief but extensive criminal history, his inability to comply with supervision and the victim impact statements, we are not persuaded to exercise our discretion in the interest of justice and reduce his sentence (see People v

People v. Brown

96 A.D.3d 869 · Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · Jun 13, 2012

[Jasmin A.], 89 AD3d 252, 256 [2011]; People v Barger, 72 AD3d 696, 697 [2010]). … [Jasmin A.], 89 AD3d at 256 [internal quotation marks omitted]), we must assign new counsel to represent the appellant (see People v Sanders, 91 AD3d 798 [2012]; People v Foster, 90 AD3d 1070 [2011]).

Sanford v. Brown Bros.

131 N.Y.S. 1142 · Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · Oct 6, 1911

Countrywide Home Loans, Inc. v. Brown

19 A.D.3d 638 · Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · Jun 27, 2005

In an action to foreclose a mortgage, the defendant Dennis Brown appeals from stated portions of an order and judgment (one paper) of the Supreme Court, Nassau County (McCarty, J.), entered July 7, 2004, which, inter alia … Cantico Intl., 284 AD2d 442 [2001]; Grajales v Freihofer Baking Co., 283 AD2d 608 [2001]).

Brown v. Roldan

307 A.D.2d 208 · Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · Jul 10, 2003

The agency reasonably and rationally reasoned that an illegal renovation cannot be used as a basis to exempt premises from coverage under the Rent Stabilization Law (Matter of Loventhal Mgt. v New York State Div. of Hous.

Brown v. Estate of Rosenstock

161 A.D.2d 221 · Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · May 3, 1990

(See, Rice v Ritz Assocs., 88 AD2d 513 , affd 58 NY2d 923 ; Olympia & York 2 Broadway Co. v Produce Exch. Realty Trust, 93 AD2d 465 .)

Brown v. City of New York

2026 NY Slip Op 00188 · Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · Jan 15, 2026

Brown v City of New York ( 2026 NY Slip Op 00188 ) Brown v City of New York 2026 NY Slip Op 00188 Decided on January 15, 2026 Appellate Division, First Department Published by New York State Law Reporting Bureau pursuant … Index No. 300434/17|Appeal No. 5633|Case No. 2024-06872| [*1]Nacirra Brown, as Administrator of the Estate of Jamel Brown, Plaintiff-Respondent, v The City of New York, Defendant, New York City Housing Authority, Defendant-Appellant

People ex rel. Brown v. Murray

284 A.D.2d 987 · Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · Jun 8, 2001

Batista v Walker, 198 AD2d 865 , lv denied 83 NY2d 752 ; see also, People ex rel. Mena v Brennan, 223 AD2d 513 ). … Washington v La Vallee, 34 AD2d 603 , lv denied 27 NY2d 481 ; see generally, People ex rel. Williams v La Vallee, 19 NY2d 238, 240-241 ).

People v. Brown

95 A.D.3d 1229 · Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · May 23, 2012

1980]; People v Monserrate, 90 AD3d 785, 787 [2011]). … Under these circumstances, there was legally sufficient evidence that the complainant suffered substantial pain and, therefore, sustained a physical injury (see People v Chiddick, 8 NY3d at 446 ; see also People v Kenner,

Brown v. Long Island Rail Road

304 A.D.2d 601 · Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · Apr 14, 2003

Auth., 267 AD2d 155 [1999]; Prysock v Metropolitan Transp. Auth., 251 AD2d 308, 309 [1998]; de Pena v New York City Tr. Auth., 236 AD2d 209, 210 [1997]; cf. Derdiarian v Felix Contr. Co., 51 NY2d 308, 315-316 [1980]). … As there was insufficient evidence to support the jury verdict, we conclude that the Supreme Court properly set it aside and dismissed the complaint (see generally Cohen v Hallmark Cards, supra; Nicastro v Park, 113 AD2d

United States v. Brown

220 A.D. 692 · Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · Jun 3, 1927

United States Shipping Board Emergency Fleet Corporation, 195 App. Div. 838 .) In Bank of United States v. … (See, also, United States v. Strang, 254 U. S. 491 ; Sloan Shipyards v. U. S. Fleet Corp., 258 id. 549 ; U. S. Shipping Board Emergency Fleet Corp. v. O’Shea, 5 F. [2d] 123.)

H. M. Brown, Inc. v. Price

38 A.D.2d 680 · Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · Dec 9, 1971

Motions to dismiss should not be granted unless it is clear that there can be no relief under any of the facts alleged in the complaint (Richardson v. Coy, 28 A D 2d 640). … Our inquiry is limited to whether the pleading states in some recognizable form any cause of action known to our law (Foley v. D’Agostino, 21 A D 2d 60).

People v. Brown

94 A.D.3d 526 · Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · Apr 12, 2012

The resentencing proceeding imposing a term of postrelease supervision was neither barred by double jeopardy nor otherwise unlawful (see People v Lingle, 16 NY3d 621 [2011]).

Turkewitz v. Planning Board

24 A.D.3d 790 · Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · Dec 27, 2005

The Supreme Court erroneously transferred this proceeding to this Court pursuant to CPLR 7804 (g) (see Matter of Sasso v Osgood, 86 NY2d 374 , 384 n 2 [1995]; Matter of Halperin v Board of Appeals on Zoning of City of New … . & Democracy v County of *792 Monroe, 159 AD2d 81, 83-84 [1990]; see also Matter of Richmond v Board of Appeals on Zoning of City of New Rochelle, 24 AD3d 782 [2005] [decided herewith]; Matter of Halperin v Board of Appeals

People v. Brown

308 A.D.2d 398 · Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · Sep 25, 2003

There is no basis for disturbing the court’s credibility determinations, which are supported by the record (see People v Prochilo, 41 NY2d 759 , 761 [1977]). … This provided, at the very least, a common-law- *399 right to approach and inquire (People v De Bour, 40 NY2d 210, 223 [1976]).

Hilaire v. Board of Parole

112 A.D.3d 1263 · Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · Dec 26, 2013

Accordingly, the appeal must be dismissed as moot (see Matter of Griffin v Evans, 105 AD3d 1221, 1222 [2013]; Matter of Charlemagne v Evans, 104 AD3d 1012, 1012 [2013]). … Contrary to petitioner’s claim, we find that the exception to the mootness doctrine is inapplicable here (see Matter of Marcelin v Evans, 108 AD3d 979, 979 [2013], lv denied 22 NY3d 855 [2013]; Matter of Gilsinger v New York

People v. Brown

93 A.D.3d 598 · Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · Mar 29, 2012

The resentencing proceeding imposing a term of postrelease supervision was neither barred by double jeopardy nor otherwise unlawful (see People v Lingle, 16 NY3d 621 [2011]).

People v. Brown

93 A.D.3d 1231 · Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · Mar 16, 2012

Same memorandum as in People v Brown ( 93 AD3d 1231 [2012]). Present — Centra, J.P, Fahey, Bindley, Sconiers and Martoche, JJ.

Brown v. City of New York

264 A.D.2d 493 · Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · Aug 30, 1999

In such an action, the New York City Health and Hospitals Corporation, not the City of New York, is the proper defendant (see, Randolph v City of New York, 69 NY2d 844 ; Pollock v City of New York, 145 AD2d 550 ). … The defendants’ remaining contentions are without merit (see, Competello v Giordano, 51 NY2d 904 ; Rose Ocko Found. v Lebovits, 259 AD2d 685 ). S. Miller, J. P., Joy, H. Miller and Feuerstein, JJ., concur.