Case law

Opinions from 1658 to today.

Filtersnyappdiv

10,000+ results

1.53s

  • Abercrombie v. Brown & Seccomb

    264 A.D. 751 · Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · May 1, 1942

    I James Travers, as Administrator, etc., of Patrick Travers, Deceased, Appellant, v. … |(Osipoff v. City of New York, 286 N. Y. 422, 431 .) Present — Martin, P. J., Glennon, Cohn and Callahan, JJ.

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • Brown v. Metropolitan Transportation Authority

    169 A.D.2d 570 · Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · Jan 24, 1991

    (Pierson v City of New York, 56 NY2d 950.) … Similarly, we find that the IAS court properly rejected plaintiff’s claim that reports issued by the Civilian Complaint Review Board and the Transit Authority Police Department constituted a valid substitute for a timely

    Cited 1 timesPublished
  • People v. Brown

    96 A.D.3d 1561 · Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · Jun 15, 2012

    NY3d 702 [2004]; see People v Bassett, 55 AD3d 1434, 1438 [2008], lv denied 11 NY3d 922 [2009]). … merit (see People v Scott, 12 AD3d 1144, 1145 [2004], lv denied 4 NY3d 767 [2005]).

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • Brown v. Berman

    96 A.D.3d 894 · Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · Jun 20, 2012

    Bergstol, 18 AD3d 411, 412 [2005]; see Northern Westchester Professional Park Assoc. v Town of Bedford, 60 NY2d 492, 499 [1983]; McGuire v McGuire, 93 AD3d at 703 ). … Owners Corp. v Celestial Church of Christ, Ileri Oluwa Parish, 94 AD3d 1033, 1034 [2012]; Marjam Supply Co., Inc. v All Craft Fabricators, Inc., 94 AD3d 954 [2012]; Hamilton v Blackwood, 85 AD3d 1116 [2011]).

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • Brown v. Ryder Truck Rental, Inc.

    172 A.D.2d 477 · Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · Apr 1, 1991

    A court will vacate such a default upon a showing of a meritorious cause of action, a justifiable excuse for the default and absence of willfulness (see, Goldstein Affiliates v Len Art Knitting Corp., 75 AD2d 551 ). … In a proper exercise of its discretion, the trial court concluded that this showing was sufficient (cf., Fidelity & Deposit Co. v Andersen & Co., 60 NY2d 693 ). Thompson, J.

    Cited 11 timesPublished
  • Town Board v. Plonski

    13 A.D.2d 704 · Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · Apr 24, 1961

    In our opinion, there is sufficient in the record to support the determination of the Zoning Board, when it was made. … However, the right to an extension did not vest, and this appeal must be decided upon the law as it now exists (Matter of Dengles v. Young, 3 A D 2d 758).

    Cited 7 timesPublished
  • People v. Brown

    96 A.D.3d 869 · Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · Jun 13, 2012

    Damato, 79 AD3d 1060, 1061 [2010]; People v Verrilli, 69 AD3d 963, 964 [2010]). … Meekins v New York, 557 US —, 129 S Ct 2856 [2009]).

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • Brown v. Travelers' Life & Accident Insurance

    26 A.D. 544 · Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · Jul 1, 1898

    Brown, the plaintiff, brought this action to recover-the sum of $750 for services alleged to have been rendered the, defendant at the request of its attorney, Frank V.

    Cited 4 timesPublished
  • Brown v. Grossman

    114 N.Y.S. 1120 · Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · Jan 15, 1909

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • Brown v. English

    105 N.Y.S. 1108 · Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · Jun 7, 1907

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • Brown v. Village of Maybrook

    59 A.D.2d 817 · Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · Oct 27, 1977

    Appeals from decisions of the Workmen’s Compensation Board, filed January 22, 1976 and November 24, 1976. … Substantial evidence supports the determination of the board. Decisions affirmed, with costs to the Workmen’s Compensation Board. Greenblott, J. P., Kane, Main, Mikoll and Herlihy, JJ., concur.

    Cited 1 timesPublished
  • People v. Brown

    96 A.D.3d 869 · Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · Jun 13, 2012

    [Jasmin A.], 89 AD3d 252, 256 [2011]; People v Barger, 72 AD3d 696, 697 [2010]). … [Jasmin A.], 89 AD3d at 256 [internal quotation marks omitted]), we must assign new counsel to represent the appellant (see People v Sanders, 91 AD3d 798 [2012]; People v Foster, 90 AD3d 1070 [2011]).

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • Massiello v. Town Board

    257 A.D.2d 962 · Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · Jan 28, 1999

    Board of Zoning & Appeals, 69 NY2d 406, 414 ). … Finally, on a motion to dismiss a petition upon an objection in point of law, all of the allegations contained in the petition are deemed to be true (see, Matter of De Paoli v Board of Educ., 92 AD2d 894 ).

    Cited 6 timesPublished
  • Forester v. State Board

    36 A.D.3d 1127 · Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · Jan 18, 2007

    The record reflects that Silberman is board certified in emergency medicine, critical care medicine, pulmonary medicine and internal medicine. … 1012, 1014 [2006]; Matter of Clarke v New York State Bd. for Professional Med.

    Cited 7 timesPublished
  • Brown v. Arcady Realty Corp.

    1 A.D.2d 753 · Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · Nov 6, 2003

    Hallmark Cards, 45 NY2d 493, 499 [1978]; see Lachanski v Craig, 141 AD2d 995, 996 [1988]; Sternberg v Foreign Cars of New Paltz, 140 AD2d 822, 823 [1988]; Kozlowski v City of Amsterdam, 111 AD2d 476, 477 [1985]). … Big V Supermarkets, 86 NY2d 744, 746 [1995], quoting Moffatt v Moffatt, 86 AD2d 864 , 864 [1982], affd 62 NY2d 875 [1984]; see Plante v Hinton, 294 AD2d 679, 680 [2002]; Marshall v Lomedico, 292 AD2d 669, 670 [2002]; Zeigler

    Cited 1 timesPublished
  • Traitel Marble Co. v. Brown Bros.

    159 A.D. 485 · Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · Dec 5, 1913

    Bank v. Ocean Nat. Bank ( 60 N. Y. 278, 291 ); Alexander v. Cauldwell (83 id. 480); Wilson v. Kings County Elev. R. R. Co. (114 id. 487, 491, 492); Jemison v. Citizens' Savings Bank (122 id. 135, 141). … Y. 430 ; Phillips v.

    Cited 13 timesPublished
  • People v. Cross & Brown Co.

    232 A.D. 587 · Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · Jun 24, 1931

    The corporate defendant, Cross & Brown Company, is the agent of a six-story non-fireproof building located at 675 Fifth avenue, city of New York. … (O'Connor v. Webber, 163 App. Div. 175 ; 219 N. Y. 439 .) We are further of opinion that the statute, moreover, does not apply where less than six persons are employed.

    Cited 2 timesPublished
  • Brown-Wilks v. Vornado Realty Trust

    2026 NY Slip Op 01179 · Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · Mar 4, 2026

    Brown-Wilks v Vornado Realty Trust ( 2026 NY Slip Op 01179 ) Brown-Wilks v Vornado Realty Trust 2026 NY Slip Op 01179 Decided on March 4, 2026 Appellate Division, Second Department Published by New York State Law Reporting … —was obligated to make payments to the plaintiff or was otherwise liable to her under the settlement agreement" ( Brown-Wilks v Vornado Realty Trust , 183 AD3d 795 , 796).

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • Brown v. Berman

    96 A.D.3d 894 · Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · Jun 20, 2012

    Bergstol, 18 AD3d 411, 412 [2005]; see Northern Westchester Professional Park Assoc. v Town of Bedford, 60 NY2d 492, 499 [1983]; McGuire v McGuire, 93 AD3d at 703 ). … Owners Corp. v Celestial Church of Christ, Ileri Oluwa Parish, 94 AD3d 1033, 1034 [2012]; Marjam Supply Co., Inc. v All Craft Fabricators, Inc., 94 AD3d 954 [2012]; Hamilton v Blackwood, 85 AD3d 1116 [2011]).

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • Tornheim v. Appeals Board

    82 A.D.3d 1253 · Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · Mar 29, 2011

    Dept. of Motor Vehs., 71 AD3d 766 [2010]; Matter of Hall v Swartz, 61 AD3d 868 [2009]). … The Appeals Board of the New York State Department of Motor Vehicles properly declined to consider evidence that was not presented at the hearing, but instead, was presented for the first time on the petitioner’s administrative

    Cited 2 timesPublished

Ask Donna

Ask Donna

A word about cookies

We need a few to keep you signed in and the library working. The rest help us see which pages people use and where they get stuck. They stay off unless you say yes.