Case law

Brown v. Bendix Aviation Corp.

274 A.D. 1049 · Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · Jan 31, 1949

Board of Trustees v. Town Board of Haverstraw

156 A.D.2d 327 · Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · Dec 4, 1989

People ex rel. Brown v. People

295 A.D.2d 834 · Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · Jun 27, 2002

Petitioner is incarcerated as a result of his conviction of a number of crimes in Supreme Court, Nassau County (see, People v Brown, 258 AD2d 661 , lv denied 93 NY2d 897 , cert denied 528 US 860 ). … Burr v Duncan, 289 AD2d 898 , Iv denied 97 NY2d 612 ), and in the absence of any circumstances which would warrant departure from these traditional orderly proceedings (see, e.g., People ex rel.

People v. Brown

100 A.D.3d 1012 · Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · Nov 28, 2012

Considering the totality of the evidence, the law, and the circumstances of the case, trial counsel provided meaningful representation (see People v Benevento, 91 NY2d 708, 712 [1998]; see also People v Caban, 5 NY3d 143, … 152 [2005]; People v Stultz, 2 NY3d 277, 287 [2004]; People v Rivera, 71 NY2d 705, 709 [1988]).

People v. Brown

101 A.D.3d 1627 · Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · Dec 21, 2012

Ingram, 217 AD2d 986, 987 [1995]; see generally People v Goggins, 34 NY2d 163, 168-169 [1974], cert denied 419 US 1012 [1974]). … “[T]he right to counsel does not include the right to delay” (People v Arroyave, 49 NY2d 264, 273 [1980] [internal quotation marks omitted]).

Amodeo v. Town Board

249 A.D.2d 882 · Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · Apr 30, 1998

Petitioners, owners of real property located in the R district, thereafter commenced this combined CPLR article 78 proceeding and action for a declaratory judgment against the Planning Board, the Town Board, the financial … Assocs. v Tyburski, 124 AD2d 553 , lv denied 68 NY2d 612 ; see also, Matter of Gernatt Asphalt Prod. v Town of Sardinia, 87 NY2d 668 ; Matter of Llana v Town of Pittstown, 234 AD2d 881 ).

People v. Brown

100 A.D.3d 1452 · Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · Nov 9, 2012

Contrary to defendant’s contention, the record establishes that he knowingly, voluntarily and intelligently waived the right to appeal (see generally People v Lopez, 6 NY3d 248, 256 [2006]). … That valid waiver encompasses his further contention that County Court erred in refusing to suppress his statement to the police (see People v Kemp, 94 NY2d 831, 833 [1999]).

Baron v. Brown

101 A.D.3d 915 · Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · Dec 19, 2012

Ctr., 98 AD3d 1035 [2012]; Mikus v Rosell, 62 AD3d 674, 675 [2009]; Scanzano v Horowitz, 49 AD3d 855, 856 [2008]; Norum v Landau, 22 AD3d 650, 651 [2005]; Murphy v Jacoby, 250 AD2d 826 [1998]). … Ctr., 98 AD3d 1035 [2012]; Mikus v Rosell, 62 AD3d at 675 ; Scanzano v Horowitz, 49 AD3d at 856 ; Norum v Landau, 22 AD3d at 651 ; Murphy v Jacoby, 250 AD2d 826 [1998]).

People v. Brown

100 A.D.3d 1035 · Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · Nov 1, 2012

Alvarez, 38 AD3d 930, 934 [2007], lv denied 8 NY3d 981 [2007] [citation omitted]; see People v Tucker, 91 AD3d at 1031-1032 ). … Since there was not a reasonable view of the evidence that defendant committed these lesser offenses but not the greater, we find no error (see generally People v Gray, 30 AD3d at 773 ; People v Muir, 3 AD3d 597, 599 [2004

Reed v. Planning Board

120 A.D.2d 510 · Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · May 5, 1986

, 99 AD2d 770 ; see also, Matter of Hayes v Gibbs, 89 AD2d 656 ; Matter of Freeman v Town of Ithaca Zoning Bd. of Appeals, 61 AD2d 1070 ). … of deleterious changes that adversely affect the adjoining area” (Matter of Van Euclid Co. v Sargent, 97 AD2d 913, 915 ; see, Sackson v Zimmerman, 103 AD2d 843 ).

People v. Brown

100 A.D.3d 1012 · Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · Nov 28, 2012

Considering the totality of the evidence, the law, and the circumstances of the case, trial counsel provided meaningful representation (see People v Benevento, 91 NY2d 708, 712 [1998]; see also People v Caban, 5 NY3d 143, … 152 [2005]; People v Stultz, 2 NY3d 277, 287 [2004]; People v Rivera, 71 NY2d 705, 709 [1988]).

Kamhi v. Planning Board

89 A.D.2d 111 · Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · Oct 12, 1982

THE ENABLING ACTS A town planning board may only act within the parameters of the enabling statutes (see Nemeroff Realty Corp. v Kerr, 38 AD2d 437 , affd 32 NY2d 873 ). … Corp. v Tuttle, supra, p 225). The evidence before the planning board established that the area sought by it for dedication was environmentally sensitive.

Hilaire v. Board of Parole

112 A.D.3d 1263 · Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · Dec 26, 2013

Accordingly, the appeal must be dismissed as moot (see Matter of Griffin v Evans, 105 AD3d 1221, 1222 [2013]; Matter of Charlemagne v Evans, 104 AD3d 1012, 1012 [2013]). … Contrary to petitioner’s claim, we find that the exception to the mootness doctrine is inapplicable here (see Matter of Marcelin v Evans, 108 AD3d 979, 979 [2013], lv denied 22 NY3d 855 [2013]; Matter of Gilsinger v New York

Brown v. T-L Marketplace, LLC

2019 NY Slip Op 748 · Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · Feb 1, 2019

Brown v T-L Marketplace, LLC ( 2019 NY Slip Op 00748 ) Brown v T-L Marketplace, LLC 2019 NY Slip Op 00748 Decided on February 1, 2019 Appellate Division, Fourth Department Published by New York State Law Reporting Bureau … BROWN, PLAINTIFFS-RESPONDENTS, v T-L MARKETPLACE, LLC, DEFENDANT-APPELLANT.

Brown v. Amityville Plaza Associates

210 A.D.2d 368 · Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · Dec 19, 1994

in the record establishing that the third-party defendant Village affirmatively created the alleged defect (see, Tyschak v Incorporated Vil. of Westbury, 193 AD2d 670, 671 ). … Under these circumstances, the *369 third-party complaint must be dismissed (see, Misek-Falkoff v Village of Pleasantville, supra; Tysehak v Incorporated Vil. of Westbury, supra). Mangano, P.

Brown v. Frederick Loeser & Co.

244 A.D. 819 · Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · May 15, 1935

Brown v. Haylor, Freyer & Coon, Inc.

60 A.D.3d 1188 · Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · Mar 12, 2009

Pratt, 13 AD3d 709, 710 [2004], quoting Richardson v Rotterdam Sq. … Homeowners Assn., 46 AD3d 1314, 1315 [2007]; Dickerson v Troy Hous.

Brown-Duffy Goatskin Corp. v. Henkel

211 A.D. 342 · Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · Jan 9, 1925

Brown v. Kelly

100 A.D.3d 480 · Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · Nov 13, 2012

was the natural and proximate result of a service-related accident (see Matter of McCambridge v McGuire, 62 NY2d 563, 568 [1984]). … An accident is a “sudden, fortuitous mischance, unexpected, out of the ordinary, and injurious in impact” (Matter of Lichtenstein v Board of Trustees of Police Pension Fund of Police Dept. of City of N.Y., Art.

American Distilling Co. v. Brown

269 A.D. 763 · Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · May 4, 1945

As was said in United States v. Chase ( 135 U.