Case law

People ex rel. Brown v. Tighe

146 A.D. 491 · Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · Oct 27, 1911

(McKelvey v. Marsh, 63 App. Div. 396 .) … In People v. Winness (3 N. Y. Cr.

Brown v. Samalin & Bock, P. C.

168 A.D.2d 531 · Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · Dec 17, 1990

Co. v Community Servs., 145 AD2d 603 ). … Capelin Assocs. v Globe Mfg.

Rogan v. Sear-Brown Group

288 A.D.2d 823 · Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · Nov 9, 2001

People v. Brown

101 A.D.3d 1267 · Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · Dec 13, 2012

Accordingly, we conclude that defendant’s waiver of the right to appeal was valid (see People v Tolliver, 92 AD3d 1024, 1024 [2012]; People v Shaver, 92 AD3d 978, 979 [2012], lv denied 18 NY3d 998 [2012]). … [2010]; People v Baez, 67 AD3d 1204 , 1204 [2009], lv denied 14 NY3d 797 [2010]).

People v. Brown

102 A.D.3d 977 · Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · Jan 30, 2013

People v Crump, 53 NY2d 824 [1981]; People v Brown, 45 NY2d 852 [1978]). … Freeman, 93 AD3d 805 [2012]; People v Maxwell, 89 AD3d at 1109 ; People v Rohlehr, 87 AD3d 603, 604 [2011]).

People v. Brown

102 A.D.3d 704 · Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · Jan 9, 2013

695, 697 [1984]; People v Tucker, 55 NY2d at 6 ; People v Dominique, 36 AD3d at 625 ). … Muhammad, 17 NY3d 532, 539-540 [2011]; People v Tucker, 55 NY2d at 6 ; People v Francois, 85 AD3d 813, 814 [2011]; People v James, 249 AD2d 919 [1998]).

Brown v. Christopher Street Owners Corp.

211 A.D.2d 441 · Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · Jan 10, 1995

On April 18, 1990, plaintiff Arthur Brown was hired by defendant Anne Hack, a proprietary tenant and shareholder of a cooperative apartment unit, to clean the windows. … Schneier v Owen Realty Co., 271 App Div 983 ).

Kelch v. Town Board

36 A.D.3d 1110 · Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · Jan 18, 2007

. * A town board has the authority to set salaries for town employees and, if the town has more than one justice, may decide *1111 to pay different amounts to each justice (see Town Law § 27 [1]; Matter of Taney v Town of … Burby v Howland, supra at 282).

People v. Brown

102 A.D.3d 977 · Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · Jan 30, 2013

People v Crump, 53 NY2d 824 [1981]; People v Brown, 45 NY2d 852 [1978]). … Freeman, 93 AD3d 805 [2012]; People v Maxwell, 89 AD3d at 1109 ; People v Rohlehr, 87 AD3d 603, 604 [2011]).

Brown v. Manhattan Railway Co.

105 A.D. 395 · Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · Jul 1, 1905

(Brown v. Manhattan Railway Co., 82 App. Div. 222 .) The judgment here appealed from must be reversed for the following reasons : First. … (Storey v. Brennan, 15 N. Y. 524 ; Algur v. Gardner, 54 id. 360; Palmer v. Kelly, 56 id. 637.)

People v. Brown

101 A.D.3d 895 · Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · Dec 12, 2012

Horne, 97 NY2d 404 , 414 n 3 [2002]; People v Haylett, 100 AD3d 774 [2d Dept 2012]; People v Francis, 82 AD3d 1263 [2011]; People v Nelson, 77 AD3d 973 [2010]; People v Harris, 72 AD3d 1110 [2010]), and we decline to exercise … quotation marks omitted]; see People v Bennette, 56 NY2d 142, 146 [1982]; People v Carrasquillo, 204 AD2d 735, 735 [1994]; People v Johnston, 186 AD2d 822, 822 [1992]).

Ramsay v. Town Board

241 A.D. 83 · Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · Apr 20, 1934

Co. v. Van Amburgh, 223 App. Div. 485, 490 ; affd. on opinion below, 251 N. Y. 548 .) … (Eastman Kodak Co. v. Richards, 123 Misc. 83 .) In People ex rel. Pennsylvania Gas Co. v. P. S. Comm. ( 181 App.

Brown v. Niagara Mohawk Power Corp.

188 A.D.2d 1014 · Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · Dec 30, 1992

Memorandum: While working in a boiler at the Niagara Mohawk Steam Station in Dunkirk, plaintiff Kevin Brown was injured when descending a ladder from the third to the second tier of scaffolding. … Supreme Court properly held that Labor Law § 240 (1) applies (see, Aruck v Xerox Corp., 144 Misc 2d 367, 372 , affd 166 AD2d 907 ; see also, Pietsch v Moog, Inc., 156 AD2d 1019 ).

Kahn v. Planning Board

60 A.D.3d 1451 · Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · Mar 27, 2009

The record establishes that petitioner did not argue to respondent Planning Board of City of Buffalo that it violated article 8 of the Environmental Conservation Law in failing to refer the project to the City of Buffalo … O’Donnell v Town of Schoharie, 291 AD2d 739, 741-742 [2002]; Matter of Forjone v Bove, 280 AD2d 948 [2001]).

School Board of Borough v. Board of Education

54 N.Y.S. 185 · Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · Nov 3, 1898

Indeed, it is seldom that the legislative intent as to the time when a statutory change shall take effect is so clearly .and unequivocally manifested as it is in this case: “The board of estimate and apportionment shall,

Connell v. Town Board

113 A.D.2d 359 · Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · Dec 5, 1985

Co. v Board of Educ., 79 AD2d 376, 379 ). Since the article 78 proceeding herein was commenced nearly 15 months after the resolution was adopted, it was clearly untimely. … York, supra, p 682; Press v County of Monroe, supra, pp 703-704; Solnick v Whalen, supra, pp 229-233 ).

Brown v. Two Exchange Plaza Partners

146 A.D.2d 129 · Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · Apr 6, 1989

Fund, 69 NY2d 559, 567-568 ; Margolin v New York Life Ins. Co., 32 NY2d 149, 152-153 ). … Liability under Labor Law § 240 (1) is absolute, meaning that it is imposed without regard to whether due care was exercised or not (Zimmer v Chemung County Performing Arts, 65 NY2d 513, 521 ; Crawford v Leimzider, 100 AD2d

Rose v. Brown & Williamson Tobacco Corp.

53 A.D.3d 80 · Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · Apr 10, 2008

Brown & Williamson Holdings, Inc., 498 F Supp 2d 639, 648 [SD NY 2007]). … Smith, J.), entered July 18, 2005, which, insofar as appealed from, after a jury trial, awarded plaintiffs damages against defendants Brown & Williamson Holdings, Inc. and Philip Morris USA Inc. based on a cause of action

People v. Brown

100 A.D.3d 1452 · Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · Nov 9, 2012

Contrary to defendant’s contention, the record establishes that he knowingly, voluntarily and intelligently waived the right to appeal (see generally People v Lopez, 6 NY3d 248, 256 [2006]). … That valid waiver encompasses his further contention that County Court erred in refusing to suppress his statement to the police (see People v Kemp, 94 NY2d 831, 833 [1999]).

People v. Brown

101 A.D.3d 1627 · Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · Dec 21, 2012

Ingram, 217 AD2d 986, 987 [1995]; see generally People v Goggins, 34 NY2d 163, 168-169 [1974], cert denied 419 US 1012 [1974]). … “[T]he right to counsel does not include the right to delay” (People v Arroyave, 49 NY2d 264, 273 [1980] [internal quotation marks omitted]).