Case law

Brown v. Feehan

125 A.D.3d 1499 · Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · Feb 13, 2015

Board of Educ. of Jordan-Elbridge Cent. … of the legal issues involved in the determination of a[n] . . . application, are exempt from the provisions of the Open Meetings Law” (2 NY Jur 2d, Administrative Law § 103; see Matter of Young v Board of Appeals of Inc.

710 Linden v. Brown

4 A.D.3d 522 · Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · Feb 23, 2004

Co., 93 NY2d 750 [1999]; Bray v Cox, 38 NY2d 350 [1976]). … The dismissal for lack of prosecution is a ground for dismissal of the instant appeal, which raises issues which could have been raised on the prior appeal (see Rubeo v National Grange Mut. Ins. Co., supra).

Brown v. City of New York

150 A.D.3d 615 · Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · May 30, 2017

Brown v City of New York ( 2017 NY Slip Op 04221 ) Brown v City of New York 2017 NY Slip Op 04221 Decided on May 30, 2017 Appellate Division, First Department Published by New York State Law Reporting Bureau pursuant to Judiciary … Decided on May 30, 2017 Acosta, P.J., Friedman, Andrias, Webber, Gesmer, JJ. 4129 111619/08 [*1]Frances Brown, Plaintiff-Appellant, v The City of New York, Defendant-Respondent, The New York City Transit, et al., Defendants

People v. Brown

124 A.D.3d 1341 · Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · Jan 2, 2015

, 11 NY3d 527, 534 [2008]; People v Smith, 45 AD3d 1478, 1479 [2007]). … Dominguez, 88 AD3d 901, 901 [2011], lv denied 18 NY3d 882 [2012]; People v Savinan, 59 AD3d 247, 247 [2009], lv dismissed 12 NY3d 787 [2009]; People v Flores, 50 AD3d 1156, 1156 [2008], lv dismissed 10 NY3d 934 [2008]).

Claim of Houston v. Brown

217 A.D. 229 · Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · Jun 29, 1926

(Leggett v. Firth, 132 N. Y. 7 ; Terry v. Wiggins, 47 id. 512; Real Prop. Law, § 149; Pers. Prop. Law, § 11; Hasbrouck v. Knoblauch, 130 App. Div. 378 .) … (Whitlock v. McKechnie, 1 Bosw. 427 ; Charman v. Henshaw, 15 Gray, 293 ; Haug v. Haug, 90 Ill. App. 604 .) The other proof noticed is competent as bearing upon the question (Healy v. Clark, 120 N. Y. 642 ; Ryan v.

Brown v. City of New York

69 A.D.3d 893 · Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · Jan 26, 2010

, 94 NY2d 912 [2000]; Maddox v City of New York, 66 NY2d 270 [1985]; Manoly v City of New York, 29 AD3d 649 [2006]; Colucci v Nansen Park, 226 AD2d 336 [1996]; Brown v City of Peekskill, 212 AD2d 658 [1995]). … 806 [2009]; Miller v Kings Park Cent.

People v. Brown

122 A.D.3d 1006 · Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · Nov 13, 2014

]; People v Roche, 106 AD3d 1328, 1329 [2013]). … in the interest of justice is unwarranted (see People v Ortolaza, 120 AD3d at 844 ; People v Smith, 112 AD3d 1232 , 1233 [2013], lv denied 22 NY3d 1203 [2014]).

Brown v. Mutual Life Insurance

273 A.D. 817 · Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · Jan 26, 1948

American Transit Insurance v. Brown

66 A.D.2d 447 · Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · Oct 8, 2009

Brown’s counsel notified ATIC of his client’s claim against Batista, and ATIC acknowledged Brown’s claim in a letter dated January 28, 2003, and assigned a claim number. … Wisely, Brown has a fallback position: namely, if ATIC did not receive the letter, it is because Brown sent it to the wrong address because ATIC did not notify him of the change of addresses.

Hooker v. Town Board

60 A.D.2d 684 · Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · Dec 8, 1977

A special use permit had been granted by respondent zoning board on April 5, 1974 and a building permit had been issued on May 10, 1974. … In such cases the test is whether Special Term’s refusal to grant the renewal motion was an abuse of discretion (Prude v County of Erie, 47 AD2d 111 ). We hold that it was not.

People ex rel. Brown v. Artus

64 A.D.3d 1064 · Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · Jul 23, 2009

Petitioner’s convictions were upheld on direct appeal (People v Brown, 16 AD3d 430, 431 [2005], Iv denied 4 NY3d 852 [2005]). … Franza v Lape, 61 AD3d 1200, 1200 [2009]). *1065 Cardona, EJ., Feters, Lahtinen, Kavanagh and Garry, JJ., concur. Ordered that the judgment is affirmed, without costs.

Potter v. Town Board

60 A.D.3d 1333 · Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · Mar 20, 2009

Contrary to petitioners’ further contention, the Town Board timely prepared the full EAF, i.e., before the Town was committed “to a definite course of future decisions” (6 NYCRR 617.2 [b] [2]; see Matter of Billerbeck v Brady … elaboration’ of the basis for [its] determination” (id. at 529; see Matter of Eadie v Town Bd. of Town of N.

Brown v. Hoffman

122 A.D.3d 1149 · Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · Nov 14, 2014

Brown, 25 NY2d 374, 376 [1969]). … Brown, 25 NY2d at 376 ).

Dowd v. Planning Board

54 A.D.3d 339 · Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · Aug 5, 2008

The petitioners did riot seek injunctive relief until 10 months after the date of the order and judgment granting the motion of *340 the Planning Board of the Village of Millbrook (hereinafter the Planning Board) to dismiss … Nursery v Planning Bd. of Town of Orangetown, 306 AD2d 283 [2003]; cf. Matter of E & J Sylcox Realty, Inc. v Town of Newburgh Planning Bd., 12 AD3d 445 [2004]). Lifson, J.P., Miller, Dillon and Eng, JJ., concur.

Edwards-Mohammed v. Brown

2022 NY Slip Op 02780 · Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · Apr 27, 2022

Edwards-Mohammed v Brown ( 2022 NY Slip Op 02780 ) Edwards-Mohammed v Brown 2022 NY Slip Op 02780 Decided on April 27, 2022 Appellate Division, Second Department Published by New York State Law Reporting Bureau pursuant to … DOWLING, JJ. 2019-09503 (Index No. 600098/17) [*1]Aneta Edwards-Mohammed, et al., appellants, v Donella Brown, respondent. Gruenberg Kelly Della, Ronkonkoma, NY (Zachary M. Beriloff of counsel), for appellants.

Brown v. Marine Midland Bank

224 A.D.2d 1016 · Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · Feb 2, 1996

Kissing Bridge Ski Corp., 216 AD2d 967 ; Crook v du Pont de Nemours Co. … v South Nassau Community Hosp., 61 NY2d 283, 287-288 ).

Sherman v. Planning Board

82 A.D.3d 899 · Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · Mar 8, 2011

The appellants commenced this CPLR article 78 proceeding to review, among other things, a determination of the Planning Board of the Village of Scarsdale that conditionally granted the application of their neighbors, Moshe … Nursery v Planning Bd. of Town of Orangetown, 306 AD2d 283 [2003]; Matter of Padavan v City of New York, 291 AD2d 561 [2002]).

Brown v. Mechanics' & Traders' Bank

44 N.Y.S. 645 · Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · Apr 9, 1897

Brown and the defendant concerning this property. Brown v. Bank (Sup.) 12 N. Y. Supp. 861 . … Gilbert v. Wiman, 1 N. Y. 550 ; Maloney v. Nelson, 144 N. Y. 182 , 39 N. E. 82 .

Brown v. Concord Nurseries, Inc.

55 A.D.3d 1421 · Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · Oct 3, 2008

Brown v. County of Erie

60 A.D.3d 1442 · Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · Mar 27, 2009