Case law

Brown v. Retsof Mining Co.

127 A.D. 368 · Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · Jun 29, 1908

(See, too, Brown v. Foster, 113 Mass. 136 ; Zaleski v. Clark, 44 Conn. 218 .) … v.

Brown v. Huntington Medical Group

238 A.D.2d 367 · Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · Apr 14, 1997

commenced since it was brought within six months of the dismissal of an earlier action which had been improperly commenced because the plaintiff had not yet been granted letters testamentary (see, CPLR 205 [a]; Carrick v … Hosp., 51 NY2d 242 ; Vigliotti v Ricci, 229 AD2d 389 ; Brown v Zaino, 226 AD2d 492 ). Mangano, P. J., Ritter, Sullivan, Altman and McGinity, JJ., concur.

Brown v. Arnot Medical Center

79 A.D.3d 1833 · Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · Dec 30, 2010

People v. Brown

129 A.D.3d 545 · Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · Jun 18, 2015

This evidence was relevant to the contested issue of intent (see People v Alvino, 71 NY2d 233, 242 [1987]), and it tended to complete the narrative, explaining the events leading up to defendant’s arrest (see People v Morris … Moreover, the court expressly stated that, as fact-finder in this nonjury trial, it would not draw any inference of propensity, and the court is deemed capable of keeping that promise (see People v Moreno, 70 NY2d 403 [1987

People ex rel. Brown v. Schiraldi

197 A.D.3d 540 · Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · Aug 5, 2021

Brown v Schiraldi ( 2021 NY Slip Op 04650 ) People ex rel. … Brown, on behalf of Paul Morant, petitioner, v Vincent Schiraldi, etc., respondent. Damien M. Brown, Brooklyn, NY, petitioner pro se.

Savage v. Brown

128 A.D.3d 1343 · Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · May 1, 2015

The order, inter alia, denied the motions of defendants Karen Brown and Tracy Brown for summary judgment dismissing the complaint against them. … Defendant Tracy Brown, Karen’s daughter, was on the sled with another person when it struck plaintiff.

Brown v. Voda Realty LLC

2024 NY Slip Op 03129 · Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · Jun 11, 2024

Brown v Voda Realty LLC ( 2024 NY Slip Op 03129 ) Brown v Voda Realty LLC 2024 NY Slip Op 03129 Decided on June 11, 2024 Appellate Division, First Department Published by New York State Law Reporting Bureau pursuant to Judiciary … Brown, Jr., Respondent, v Voda Realty LLC, etal., Appellants. Lewis Brisbois Bisgaard & Smith, LLP, New York (Nicholas Hurzeler of counsel), for appellants. Michael H. Zhu, P.C., Rego Park (Michael H.

Brown v. Ontario Talc Co.

81 A.D. 273 · Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · Mar 15, 1903

(See Pappenheim v. M. E. R. Co., 128 N. Y. 436 .) It may be that the damage to the plaintiff’s property is only occasional, but it is a damage against which the law should protect the plaintiff. … (Duesler v. City of Johnstown, 24 App. Div. 608 ; New York Rubber Co. v. Rothery, 132 N. Y. *275 293 .)

Harvey v. Sear-Brown Group

262 A.D.2d 1006 · Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · Jun 18, 1999

967 ; Paterson v Hennessy, 206 AD2d 919, 920 ). … see also, Morgan v Prospect Park Assocs.

People ex rel. Brown v. LaClair

74 A.D.3d 1642 · Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · Jun 24, 2010

Gill v Greene ( 12 NY3d 1, 4 [2009], cert denied sub nom. … Kato v Warden, Rikers Is. Correctional Facility, 52 AD3d 320, 321 [2008]; Matter of Ellington v Senkowski, 306 AD2d 662 [2003]). Mercure, J.P., Lahtinen, Kavanagh, McCarthy and Egan Jr., JJ., concur.

People v. Brown

125 A.D.3d 1049 · Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · Feb 11, 2015

His valid appeal waiver precludes from our review his contention that his sentence is harsh and excessive (see People v White, 119 AD3d 1286, 1287 [2014]; People v Brown, 115 AD3d 1115, 1115 [2014], lv denied 24 NY3d 959 … Duggins, 114 AD3d at 1002; People v Pearson, 110 AD3d 1116, 1116 [2013]).

Fisher v. Brown Group, Inc.

256 A.D.2d 1069 · Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · Dec 31, 1998

., 82 NY2d 876, 877; Lombardi v Stout, 80 NY2d 290, 295 ). … The court also properly denied plaintiffs motion in limine to preclude defendant and third-party defendant from introducing evidence related to plaintiffs injuries and damages (cf., Kish v Board of Educ., 76 NY2d 379, 385

Brown v. Business Leadership Group

57 A.D.3d 212 · Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · Dec 2, 2008

But Brown had no right to enforce these standards, particularly the GME In any event, a sponsor could, despite its best efforts, fail to meet the TRP or GMP because of market forces (see Ohanian v Avis Rent A Car Sys., Inc … Co. v Noble Lowndes Intl., 84 NY2d 430, 438 [1994]; Matter of Lipper Holdings v Trident Holdings, 1 AD3d 170 [2003]).

Frackson v. Brown & Williamson Tobacco Corp.

67 A.D.3d 213 · Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · Sep 29, 2009

(hereinafter Brown & Williamson). … Ctr., Inc. v Mahoney, Connor & Hussey, 45 .AD3d 809 [2007]; Foley v Roche, 86 AD2d at 887 ).

Brown v. 44 Street Development, LLC

137 A.D.3d 703 · Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · Mar 31, 2016

“There is no bright-line minimum height differential that determines whether an elevation hazard exists” (Auriemma v Biltmore Theatre, LLC, 82 AD3d 1, 9 [1st Dept 2011]), and here, the record establishes that plaintiff’s … fall was the result of exposure to an elevation related hazard (see Arrasti v HRH Constr.

People v. Brown

125 A.D.3d 1550 · Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · Feb 13, 2015

Contrary to defendant’s contention, the fact that he was photographed from a closer range did not impermissibly draw attention to his photograph in the array (see People v Brown, 169 AD2d 934, 935 [1991], lv denied 77 NY2d … 958 [1991]; see also People v Smiley, 49 AD3d 1299, 1300 [2008], lv denied 10 NY3d 870 [2008]).

Brown v. Gandy

125 A.D.3d 1389 · Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · Feb 6, 2015

Family Court properly concluded that the standard to be applied in determining the location of visitation is the best interests of the child (see Matter of Gold v Gold, 53 AD3d 485, 488 [2008]). … NY2d 708, 712 [1998]; see Matter of Reinhardt v Hardison, 122 AD3d 1448, 1449 [2014]).

Brown v. Feehan

125 A.D.3d 1499 · Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · Feb 13, 2015

Board of Educ. of Jordan-Elbridge Cent. … of the legal issues involved in the determination of a[n] . . . application, are exempt from the provisions of the Open Meetings Law” (2 NY Jur 2d, Administrative Law § 103; see Matter of Young v Board of Appeals of Inc.

Brown v. City of New York

150 A.D.3d 615 · Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · May 30, 2017

Brown v City of New York ( 2017 NY Slip Op 04221 ) Brown v City of New York 2017 NY Slip Op 04221 Decided on May 30, 2017 Appellate Division, First Department Published by New York State Law Reporting Bureau pursuant to Judiciary … Decided on May 30, 2017 Acosta, P.J., Friedman, Andrias, Webber, Gesmer, JJ. 4129 111619/08 [*1]Frances Brown, Plaintiff-Appellant, v The City of New York, Defendant-Respondent, The New York City Transit, et al., Defendants

Fuentes v. Planning Board

82 A.D.3d 883 · Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · Mar 8, 2011

Corp. v Planning Bd. of the Inc. … Thus, although the Planning Board could properly enforce the language recorded on the plat map (see O'Mara v Town of Wappinger, 9 NY3d 303, 309 [2007]; Patten Corp. v Association of Prop.