Case law

BROWN, JUSTIN v. ALEXANDER, VALERIE

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · Sep 26, 2014

JUSTIN BROWN, PLAINTIFF-APPELLANT, V ORDER VALERIE ALEXANDER, ALSO KNOWN AS VALERIE J. LAYMON, DEFENDANT-RESPONDENT. … HURWITZ & FINE, P.C., BUFFALO (V. CHRISTOPHER POTENZA OF COUNSEL), FOR DEFENDANT-RESPONDENT. Appeal from an order of the Supreme Court, Oneida County (David A. Murad, J.), entered March 4, 2013.

Brown v. Daisy Manufacturing Co.

129 A.D.2d 995 · Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · Apr 3, 1987

Discovery of similar subsequent accidents is permissible because such proof may be admissible at trial to establish the existence of a defect (Carnibucci v Marlin Firearms Co., 51 AD2d 1067 ). … The CPLR does not require defendant to create documents to be discovered (see, Frasier v Conklin, 105 AD2d 1018 ), and thus the 11th ordering paragraph is deleted.

People v. Brown

149 A.D.3d 768 · Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · Apr 5, 2017

137 [1981]; People v Bruce, 130 AD3d 938 [2015]; People v Reyes, 49 AD3d 565, 567 [2008]). … The sentence imposed was not excessive (see People v Suitte, 90 AD2d 80, 83 [1982]). Mastro, J.P., Chambers, Miller and Barros, JJ., concur.

People v. Brown

287 A.D.2d 270 · Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · Oct 4, 2001

(See Anders v California, 386 US 738 ; People v Saunders, 52 AD2d 833.)

Brown v. Basics USA, Inc.

3 A.D.3d 546 · Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · Jan 26, 2004

In this regard, the mannequin upon which the plaintiff Sharon Brown allegedly tripped was readily observable and not an inherently dangerous condition (see Cupo v Karfunkel, 1 AD3d 48 [2003]). … In opposition, the plaintiffs failed to raise a triable issue of fact (see Zuckerman v City of New York, 49 NY2d 557, 562 [1980]).

People v. Brown

287 A.D.2d 729 · Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · Oct 29, 2001

Viewing the evidence adduced at trial in the light most favorable to the People (see, People v Contes, 60 NY2d 620 ), we find that it was legally sufficient to establish the defendant’s guilt beyond a reasonable doubt.

BROWN, GEORGE v. ANNUCCI, ANTHONY

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · Jul 3, 2014

IN THE MATTER OF GEORGE BROWN, PETITIONER, V ORDER ANTHONY ANNUCCI, ACTING COMMISSIONER, NEW YORK STATE DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS AND COMMUNITY SUPERVISION

Matter of Brown v. Annucci

2024 NY Slip Op 05675 · Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · Nov 15, 2024

Matter of Brown v Annucci ( 2024 NY Slip Op 05675 ) Matter of Brown v Annucci 2024 NY Slip Op 05675 Decided on November 15, 2024 Appellate Division, Fourth Department Published by New York State Law Reporting Bureau pursuant … This Court rejected petitioner's arguments that the sentence on count 3 could not legally run consecutively to the sentence on count 2 or the sentence on count 4 ( People v Brown , 204 AD3d 1390, 1394 [4th Dept 2022], lv

Brown v. Village of Owego

260 A.D. 328 · Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · Jul 2, 1940

(Matter of Joyce v. Dobson, 255 App. Div. 348 ; Village of North Pelham v. Ohliger, 216 id. 728; Kraft v. Village of Hastings-on-Hudson, 258 id. 1060.) In Y. W. H. Assn. v. Board of Standards & Appeals (266 N. … (Matter of Ward v. Murdock, 247 App. Div, 808 ; *334 Matter of Stillman v. Board of Standards and Appeals, 222 id. 19; affd., 247 N. Y. 599 ; Matter of McIntosh v. Johnson, 211 id. 265.)

Monarch Life Insurance v. Brown

125 A.D.2d 75 · Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · Feb 26, 1987

Brown providing a monthly disability income benefit of $1,500. On June 24, 1984, more than two years after the inception of the policy, Brown submitted an application for benefits to Monarch. … A letter from Brown’s doctor, John Morseman, M.D., stated that since Brown’s hospitalization in May of 1984, "he has been completely unable to work because of his underlying heart disease”.

Brown v. Aurora Systems, Inc.

283 A.D.2d 956 · Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · May 2, 2001

Brown (plaintiff), an employee of third-party defendant Metal Cladding, Inc. … Plaintiffs met the three-prong test under Buran v Coupal ( 87 NY2d 173, 178 ) to entitle them to that relief. Defendant Gould, Inc.

Brown v. County of Suffolk

89 A.D.3d 661 · Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · Nov 1, 2011

City of New York, 8 NY3d 888, 889-890 [2007]; Forbes v City of New York, 85 AD3d 1106, 1106 [2011]; Richards v Incorporated Vil. of Rockville Ctr., 80 AD3d 594, 594-595 [2011]; cf. … Padula v City of Long Beach, 20 AD3d 555, 556 [2005]).

Brown v. State Farm Insurance

237 A.D.2d 476 · Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · Mar 24, 1997

Corp. v Weiner, 209 AD2d 585 ). The Supreme Court erred in dismissing State Farm’s second affirmative defense, which alleged that the fires were intentionally caused by or with the consent of the plaintiff. … Co., 204 AD2d 689 ; Ferraraccio v Hartford Ins. Co., 187 AD2d 954 ; Kamyr, Inc. v St. Paul Surplus Lines Ins. Co., 152 AD2d 62 ; see also, Guberman v William Penn Life Ins. Co., 146 AD2d 8 ).

Boung Jae Jang v. Brown

161 A.D.2d 49 · Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · Sep 17, 1990

Ross, supra, at 37; see also, Cox v Louisiana, 379 US 536, 551 ; Houser v Hill, 278 F Supp 920, 927 ; Cottonreader v Johnson, supra, at 497). … Brown, J. P., Harwood and Balletta, JJ., concur. Ordered that the judgment is affirmed, with costs. .

Brown v. Metropolitan Transportation Authority

256 A.D.2d 17 · Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · Dec 1, 1998

Brown (see, Law v City of New York, 250 AD2d 540 ; Dominguez v Manhattan & Bronx Surface Tr. Operating Auth., 168 AD2d 376 ). The motion court also properly denied plaintiffs motion for costs and sanctions. … in light of counsel’s failure on two occasions to comply with the motion court’s directives that plaintiff be produced for examination, can we say that the motion court improvidently exercised its discretion (see, Hanson v

People v. Brown

146 A.D.3d 967 · Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · Jan 25, 2017

The defendant’s valid waiver of his right to appeal precludes review of his contention that the sentence imposed was excessive (see People v Sanders, 25 NY3d 337 [2015]; People v Bradshaw, 18 NY3d 257, 264-267 [2011]; People … v Lopez, 6 NY3d 248, 255 [2006]; People v Marshall, 143 AD3d 842 [2016]; People v Redd, 142 AD3d 1186 [2016]).

Brown v. Government Employees Insurance Co.

156 A.D.3d 1087 · Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · Dec 14, 2017

Co. of Am., 97 AD3d 562 , 564-565 [2012]; Shebar v Metropolitan Life Ins. Co., 25 AD3d at 858-859 ; Joannou v Blue Ridge Ins. Co., 289 AD2d 531, 532 [2001]; Acquista v New York Life Ins. … Co. of N.Y., 57 NY2d 757, 759 [1982]; accord Johnson v Jamaica Hosp., 62 NY2d 523, 528-529 [1984]; see Hess v Nationwide Mut. Ins.

Board of Commissioners v. Board of Zoning & Appeals

188 A.D.2d 464 · Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · Dec 7, 1992

In a proceeding pursuant to CPLR article 78 to review a determination of the Board of Zoning and Appeals of the Town of North Hempstead, dated April 11, 1990, which granted an application for a use variance, the Board of … Zoning Bd. of Appeals, 184 AD2d 565, 566 ; Matter of D'Alessandro v Board of Zoning & Appeals, 177 AD2d 694 ; Matter of Town Bd. v Zoning Bd. of Appeals, 161 AD2d 647 ).

Brown v. 3392 Bar Corp.

2 A.D.3d 324 · Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · Dec 23, 2003

Blood Program, 80 NY2d 219, 226 [1992]; Yaniv v Taub, 256 AD2d 273, 275 [1998]). The amended pleading properly related back to the original summons and complaint (CPLR 203 [f]). … There is no indication that the corporate defendant will be hindered in preparing its case (see Loomis v Civetta Corinno *326 Constr.

BROWN, STANLEY A., PEOPLE v

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · Feb 7, 2014

THE PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK, RESPONDENT, V ORDER STANLEY A. BROWN, DEFENDANT-APPELLANT. DAVISON LAW OFFICE PLLC, CANANDAIGUA (MARK C.