Case law
Opinions from 1658 to today.
10,000+ results
1.34s
212 A.D.2d 658 · Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · Feb 21, 1995
, 68 NY2d 432, 439 ; see also, Weithofer v Unique Racquetball & Health Clubs, 211 AD2d 783 ; Gonzalez v City of New York, 203 AD2d 421 ; Ferrarro v Town of Huntington, 202 AD2d 468 ; Russini v Incorporated Vil. of Mineola … , 184 AD2d 561 ; Hoffman v City of New York, 172 AD2d 716 ).
Cited 9 timesPublished89 A.D.2d 755 · Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · Jul 29, 1982
Citing Barasch v Micucci ( 49 NY2d 594 ), Special Term held that the default was due to law office failure and that pursuant to Bruno v Village of Port Chester ( 77 AD2d 580 , app dsmd 51 NY2d 769 ), the Barasch criteria … In Eaton v Equitable Life Assur. Soc. of U.
Cited 2 timesPublished140 A.D.3d 1682 · Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · Jun 10, 2016
It is axiomatic that “[t]he record must establish that the defendant understood that the right to appeal is separate and distinct from those rights automatically forfeited upon a plea of guilty” (People v Lopez, 6 NY3d 248
Cited 0 timesPublished153 A.D.3d 1360 · Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · Sep 20, 2017
[2013]; People v Benevento, 91 NY2d 708 [1998]; People v Baldi, 54 NY2d 137 [1981]). … Crimmins, 36 NY2d 230, 241-242 [1975]; see People v Arafet, 13 NY3d 460, 467-468 [2009]).
Cited 0 timesPublished19 A.D.2d 668 · Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · Jun 27, 1963
(Cosgrove v. Ogden, 49 N. Y. 255 ; Jones v. Weigand, 134 App. Div. 644, 645 ; Wood v. Saunders, 228 App. Div. 69 ; Brown v. Great Atlantic, dt Pacific Tea Co., 275 App. Div. 304 ; Bluestein v. Scoparino, 277 App. … Co. v. United States, 212 U. S. 481, 493 ).
Cited 1 timesPublished21 A.D.2d 593 · Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · Oct 8, 1964
Thereby is confirmed Mercury’s appraisal of Brown’s services as unique and extraordinary. (See Purchasing Assoc. v. … (Parker v. Borock, 5 N Y 2d 156.)
Cited 7 timesPublished109 A.D. 150 · Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · Nov 15, 1905
Shorn of the verbiage of the complaint, the cause of action asserted is that the plaintiffs, doing business as Brown & Shaw, sold certain salt to various parties under an employment with the defendant, for which they were … appears to have been some negotiation for the renewal of the previous contract, and the following letter was written to the plaintiffs and received by them: . *152 “ Retsof Mining Company. “ Scranton, Pa., May 21, 1900. “ Brown
Cited 4 timesPublishedBROWN, FARASA v. PHIPPS, WILLIAM
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · Oct 9, 2015
FARASA BROWN, PLAINTIFF-RESPONDENT, V ORDER WILLIAM PHIPPS, DEFENDANT-APPELLANT. CABANISS CASEY LLP, ALBANY (BRIAN D.
Cited 0 timesPublishedAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · Oct 2, 2015
THE PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK, RESPONDENT, V MEMORANDUM AND ORDER CLAYTON L. BROWN, DEFENDANT-APPELLANT.
Cited 0 timesPublished52 A.D.3d 1324 · Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · Jun 13, 2008
Contrary to defendants’ contention, Supreme Court providently exercised *1325 its discretion in granting plaintiffs motion in the interest of justice (see Bertucci v Mosey, 45 AD3d 1385, 1386-1387 [2007]; Abu-Aqlein v El-Jamal … , 44 AD3d 884 [2007]; Busler v Corbett, 259 AD2d 13, 17 [1999]).
Cited 4 timesPublishedBROWN & BROWN, INC. v. JOHNSON, THERESA A.
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · Feb 7, 2014
BROWN & BROWN, INC. AND BROWN & BROWN OF NEW YORK, INC., PLAINTIFFS-RESPONDENTS-APPELLANTS, V OPINION AND ORDER THERESA A. … , 484-485; Brown & Brown, Inc. v Mudron, 379 Ill App 3d 724, 727-728, 887 NE2d 437, 440; Unisource Worldwide, Inc. v South Cent.
Cited 0 timesPublished140 A.D.3d 1683 · Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · Jun 10, 2016
Same memorandum as in People v Brown ([appeal No. 1] 140 AD3d 1682 [2016]). Present — Whalen, P.J., Smith, Lindley, NeMoyer and Scudder, JJ.
Cited 0 timesPublished268 A.D.2d 795 · Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · Jan 20, 2000
v Brown, 227 AD2d 691 , lv denied 88 NY2d 980 ; People v Arduini, 222 AD2d 965 , lv denied 87 NY2d 1016 ). … NY2d 856 ; People v Coleman, 235 AD2d 928 , lv denied 89 NY2d 1033 ; People v Baxter, 232 AD2d 196 , lv denied 89 NY2d 939 ).
Cited 4 timesPublishedBoard of Commissioners v. Board of Zoning & Appeals
188 A.D.2d 464 · Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · Dec 7, 1992
In a proceeding pursuant to CPLR article 78 to review a determination of the Board of Zoning and Appeals of the Town of North Hempstead, dated April 11, 1990, which granted an application for a use variance, the Board of … Zoning Bd. of Appeals, 184 AD2d 565, 566 ; Matter of D'Alessandro v Board of Zoning & Appeals, 177 AD2d 694 ; Matter of Town Bd. v Zoning Bd. of Appeals, 161 AD2d 647 ).
Cited 2 timesPublishedBrown v. Associated Operating Co.
165 A.D. 702 · Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · Jan 22, 1915
Div. 368 ; Seyford v. Southern Pacific Co., 159 id. 870; Krug v. American Sugar Refining Co., 120 id. 537; Dailey v. Distler, 115 id. 102; Weller v. Consolidated Gas Co., 198 N. Y. 98 ; Sikorsky v. … (Bassett v. Fish, 75 N. Y. 303 ; Weed v. Village of Ballston Spa, 76 id. 329 ; Palmer v. Dearing, 93 id. 7; Dollard v. Roberts, 130 id. 269; Boyle v. Degnon McLean Construction Co., 47 App. Div. 311 ; Collier v.
Cited 6 timesPublished140 A.D.3d 1740 · Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · Jun 17, 2016
People v Williams, 25 NY3d 185, 193 [2015]; People v Capers, 94 AD3d 1475, 1476 [2012], lv denied 19 NY3d 971 [2012]). … People v Samms, 95 NY2d 52, 58 [2000]).
Cited 0 timesPublishedBrown v. Veterans Transportation Co.
170 A.D.2d 638 · Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · Feb 25, 1991
Accordingly, the plaintiffs waived any claim regarding noncompliance with pretrial disclosure and precalendar orders (see, Siragusa v Teal’s Express, 96 AD2d 749 ; Levy v Wexler, 16 AD2d 688 ). … P., Brown, Sullivan and Miller, JJ., concur.
Cited 8 timesPublished140 A.D.3d 1683 · Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · Jun 10, 2016
Same memorandum as in People v Brown ([appeal No. 1] 140 AD3d 1682 [2016]). Present — Whalen, P.J., Smith, Lindley, NeMoyer and Scudder, JJ.
Cited 0 timesPublishedBoyce-Canandaigua, Inc. v. Brown
289 A.D.2d 971 · Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · Dec 21, 2001
Div.] v Unmack, 92 NY2d 179, 187; Matter of Niagara Mohawk Power Corp. v City of Cohoes Bd. of Assessors, 280 AD2d 724, 725-726 , lv denied 96 NY2d 719 ). … The value determined by the Referee was within the range of expert testimony and should not be disturbed (see, Woolworth Co. v Srogi, 92 AD2d 736, 737).
Cited 6 timesPublished2025 NY Slip Op 01603 · Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · Mar 19, 2025
Brown v Heron Flatbush, LLC ( 2025 NY Slip Op 01603 ) Brown v Heron Flatbush, LLC 2025 NY Slip Op 01603 Decided on March 19, 2025 Appellate Division, Second Department Published by New York State Law Reporting Bureau pursuant … , 977 ; Brown v Villarba , 224 AD3d 652 ).
Cited 0 timesPublished
Ask Donna