Case law

Brown v. Wadsworth

54 N.Y.S. 1096 · Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · Oct 11, 1898

Matter of Alfred v. Brown

2020 NY Slip Op 2052 · Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · Mar 25, 2020

Matter of Alfred v Brown ( 2020 NY Slip Op 02052 ) Matter of Alfred v Brown 2020 NY Slip Op 02052 Decided on March 25, 2020 Appellate Division, Second Department Published by New York State Law Reporting Bureau pursuant to … V-2752-15/18A, O-377/19) [*1]In the Matter of Shakarian Alfred, respondent, v Raymond Brown, appellant. Anne Letterio, Beacon, NY, for appellant. Richard L. Herzfeld, New York, NY, for respondent. Patrick J.

Brown v. BT-Newyo, LLC

93 A.D.3d 1138 · Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · Mar 29, 2012

Mannino, 309 AD2d 1053, 1053-1054 [2003]; see Guzman v Haven Plaza Hous. … Gourmet Foods v Finlandia Ctr., 96 NY2d 280, 292 [2001]). Finally, plaintiff may not rely on defendant’s purported breach of the lease to defeat defendant’s motion.

Reliance Insurance v. Brown

59 A.D.2d 968 · Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · Nov 3, 1977

(Sewell) Brown was and still is the sole owner thereof. … NY 295 ; Carrara v Carrara, 29 Mise 2d 907; see, also, Sullivan v Corn Exch.

Melendez v. Brown-United, Inc.

2022 NY Slip Op 05600 · Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · Oct 6, 2022

Melendez v Brown-United, Inc. ( 2022 NY Slip Op 05600 ) Melendez v Brown-United, Inc. 2022 NY Slip Op 05600 Decided on October 06, 2022 Appellate Division, First Department Published by New York State Law Reporting Bureau … Index No. 114296/05 Appeal No. 16347 Case No. 2021-03402 [*1]Carlos Melendez, Plaintiff-Respondent, v Brown-United, Inc., et al., Defendants, Pro Sports & Entertainment, Inc., et al., Defendants-Appellants.

Knight v. Brown

195 A.D. 950 · Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · Feb 15, 1921

Clark v. Brown

206 A.D. 568 · Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · Nov 15, 1923

(Perry v. Rogers, 157 N. Y. 251 ; Bateman v. N. Y. C. & H. R. R. R. Co., 178 id. 84; La Marca v. Atlantic Stevedoring Co., 164 App. Div. 490 ; Maguire v. Barrett, 168 id. 836.)

Board of Managers v. Board of Assessors

73 A.D.2d 621 · Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · Dec 10, 1979

of City of Albany v Assessors of Town of Coeymans, 253 App Div 436 ; Matter of Duane Realty Corp. v Board of Assessors of Town of Rotterdam, 55 Mise 2d 1007; Matter of Vanadium Corp. of Amer. v Board of Assessors of Town … In Matter of Ithaca Masonic Temple Corp. v Calistri (57 Mise 2d 72), the board of assessors interposed no answer.

Brown v. Travelers Insurance

59 A.D.2d 781 · Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · Oct 31, 1977

In Gonzalez v Mans ( 54 AD2d 576 ) this court held that the amendment in question should be applied retroactively since it "affects no existing rights or liabilities which would preclude retroactive application * * * Rather … In Koutrakos v Long Is. Coll.

Dininny v. Brown

144 N.Y.S. 1112 · Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · Nov 28, 1913

Brown v. McArthur

106 A.D. 366 · Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · Jul 1, 1905

Div. 323 ) and that not only the facts directly alleged but those which by fair and reasonable intendment may be implied from the direct allegations are good on demurrer (Wenk v. City of New York, 171 N. … The demurrer in Morse v. Press Publishing Co. ( 63 App. Div. 61 ) was overruled because a portion of the answer alleged facts which tended to mitigate damages.

Brown v. Marathon Realty, Inc.

170 A.D.2d 426 · Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · Feb 4, 1991

In September 1983 it was determined that the then one-year-old infant plaintiff, Massad Brown, was suffering from lead poisoning, allegedly attributable to his ingestion of lead-based paint chips which had peeled from the … Vanderbilt Assocs., 141 AD2d 696, 699 ; Cherubini v Testa, 130 AD2d 380 ; Silver v Brodsky, 112 AD2d 213 ; see also, Manning v New York Tel.

Brown v. Walter

147 N.Y.S. 1100 · Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · Apr 29, 1914

Balfe v. Brown

214 A.D. 743 · Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · May 15, 1925

Award unanimously affirmed, with costs to the State Industrial Board, on the authority of Matter of Jordan v. Decorative Co. ( 230 N. Y. 522 ).

Williams v. Brown

80 N.Y.S. 247 · Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · Feb 11, 1903

Brown v. Ogilvie

213 A.D. 881 · Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · Apr 15, 1925

The case of Cahill v. Inecto, Inc. ( 208 App. Div. 191 ) is not in point. In that case no effort was made by the defendant to .show the composition of the substance used.

Brown v. Harmon

58 N.Y.S. 1137 · Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · May 24, 1899

Daley v. Brown

45 A.D. 428 · Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · Nov 15, 1899

(Todd v. Nelson, 109 N. Y. 324 .) Third. The third contention of the defendants presents a more •difficult question.

Cassano v. Brown

131 N.Y.S. 1024 · Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · Dec 1, 1911

For the reasons stated in Dippolito, as Administrator, v. Brown, 131 N. Y. Supp. 1021 , decided herewith, the and a new trial granted, with costs to plaintiff to at exceptions are sustained, ide the event.

Fox v. Brown

155 N.Y.S. 1107 · Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · Nov 10, 1915