Case law

People v. Brown

67 A.D.3d 1357 · Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · Nov 13, 2009

It is hereby ordered that the judgment so appealed from is unanimously affirmed (see People v Hidalgo, 91 NY2d 733, 737 [1998]). Present—Scudder, P.J., Hurlbutt, Green, Pine and Gorski, JJ.

Landa v. Brown Chiari, LLP

2023 NY Slip Op 04761 · Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · Sep 27, 2023

Landa v Brown Chiari, LLP ( 2023 NY Slip Op 04761 ) Landa v Brown Chiari, LLP 2023 NY Slip Op 04761 Decided on September 27, 2023 Appellate Division, Second Department Published by New York State Law Reporting Bureau pursuant … MILLER PAUL WOOTEN LILLIAN WAN, JJ. 2020-04734 (Index No. 614389/19) [*1]Benjamin Landa, respondent, v Brown Chiari, LLP, appellant. Brown Chiari, LLP, Buffalo, NY (Timothy M. Hudson of counsel), appellant pro se.

People v. Brown

251 A.D. 810 · Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · Jun 18, 1937

(See People v. Hendricks, 232 App. Div. 186 .) Present—'Martin, P. J., Glennon, Dore, Cohn and Callahan, JJ.

Brown v. U.S. Vanadium Corp.

198 A.D.2d 863 · Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · Nov 19, 1993

Co., 184 AD2d 1022, 1023 ; Fox v Jenny Eng’g Corp., 122 AD2d 532 , affd 70 NY2d 761 ). … The cross appeal of Vanadium must be dismissed because Vanadium is not an aggrieved party (see, CPLR 5511; Town of Massena v Niagara Mohawk Power Corp., 45 NY2d 482, 488 ; Matter of Brown v Starkweather, 197 AD2d 840 , lv

Brown v. Muth

258 A.D. 961 · Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · Jan 2, 1940

(Heiman v. Bishop, 272 N. Y. 83 .) Present—Lazansky, P. J., Carswell, Johnston, Adel and Close, JJ.

People v. Board

97 A.D.2d 610 · Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · Oct 13, 1983

Concededly, the court had the authority to impose consecutive sentences {People v Bink, 93 AD2d 920 ). … court will not normally disturb a sentence imposed by a trial court in the exercise of its sound discretion unless there is an abuse of discretion, we do have the power to reduce a sentence in an appropriate case {People v

Brown v. Garey

241 A.D. 370 · Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · Jun 8, 1934

(McIntyre v. Kavanaugh, 242 U. S. 138 , affg. 210 N. Y. 175 ; Tinker v. Colwell, 193 U. S. 473 .) … (McIntyre v. Kavanaugh, supra; Heaphy v. Kerr, 190 App. Div. 810 ; affd., 232 N. Y. 526 .)

Brown v. McCruden

247 A.D. 497 · Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · Apr 1, 1936

(See, however, Rice v. Chapman, 234 App. Div. 279, 283 .)

Brown v. Randazzo

258 A.D. 748 · Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · Oct 31, 1939

Box v. Linnemann, 257 App. Div. 849 .) Lazansky, P. J., Carswell, Johnston, Adel and Taylor, JJ., concur.

Finn v. Brown

257 A.D. 51 · Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · May 15, 1939

Co. v. Bank of New York & Tr. Co., 280 N. Y. 286 .) In particular the issue here should not turn upon a refinement of the law of agency. … (Rogers Locomotive, etc., Works v. Kelley, 88 N. Y. 234 .) In so far as Good Hope Steel has been permitted to do so, payment has been made.

De Remer v. Brown

55 N.Y.S. 367 · Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · Jan 20, 1899

The contract was under seal, and was executed by De Remer & Co., of the one part, and in the name of Brown & Wells (the defendants), by Edwin H. Kellogg, as their agent, of the other part.

Brown v. Sisti

249 A.D. 308 · Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · Dec 23, 1936

Dailey v. Livingston, 80 N. Y. 66, 69.) … Lewis v. Brush, 146 N. Y. 60, 63 .)

Goettel v. Brown

248 A.D. 679 · Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · May 15, 1936

Robesch v. President of Borough of Queens ( 190 N. Y. 497 ). All concur. (The mandamus order directs reinstatement of petitioner as gardener in greenhouses on New York State Fair grounds.) Present — Sears, P.

Matter of Brown v. Annucci

2020 NY Slip Op 1689 · Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · Mar 12, 2020

Matter of Brown v Annucci ( 2020 NY Slip Op 01689 ) Matter of Brown v Annucci 2020 NY Slip Op 01689 Decided on March 12, 2020 Appellate Division, Third Department Published by New York State Law Reporting Bureau pursuant … Decided and Entered: March 12, 2020 529391 [*1]In the Matter of Duane Brown, Petitioner, v Anthony J. Annucci, as Acting Commissioner of Corrections and Community Supervision, Respondent.

Whipple v. Brown Bros.

170 A.D. 531 · Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · Nov 17, 1915

(Wilcox v. American Telephone & Telegraph Co., 176 N. Y. 115 ; Smith v. Ryan, 191 id. 452.) … (Sanford v. Brown Bros. Co., 134 App. Div. 652 ; 208 N. Y. 90 .) This without reference to any express warranty by the agent Mull.

Brown v. Stephan

245 A.D. 552 · Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · Nov 7, 1935

The facts in this proceeding are similar to those in Matter of Brown v. Stephan ( 245 App. Div. 588 ) and Matter of Perry v. Stephan (246 id. 677 ), decided herewith, except in one controlling particular. … The petitioner herein cannot avail himself of the provisions of section 114 of the Membership Corporations Law as was done in the Brown and Perry proceedings, supra, because the statute last mentioned was amended by section

Brown v. Mechanics & Traders' Bank

16 A.D. 207 · Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · Jul 1, 1897

Brown and the defendant concerning this property. (Brown v. Mechanics & Traders' Bank, 12 N. Y. Supp. 861 .) … (Gilbert v. Wiman, 1 N. Y. 550 ; Maloney v. Nelson, 144 id. 182.)

Brown v. Russell

68 N.Y.S. 755 · Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · Feb 25, 1901

Brown v. Kener

215 A.D. 794 · Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · Dec 15, 1925

All concur, except Taylor, J., who dissents from the affirmance of the judgment and votes to reverse the judgment on the law upofl the authority of Cochrane v. Schell ( 140 N. Y. 516 ). Present - Hubbs, P.

Lyon v. Brown

55 N.Y.S. 1143 · Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · Nov 11, 1898