Case law

Brown v. Barron

23 A.D.3d 1125 · Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · Nov 10, 2005

It is hereby ordered that said appeal be and the same hereby is unanimously dismissed without costs (see Hughes v Nussbaumer, Clarke & Velzy, 140 AD2d 988 [1988]; Chase Manhattan Bank, N.A. v Roberts & Roberts, 63 AD2d 566

Matter of Castillo v. Brown

151 A.D.3d 1310 · Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · Jun 15, 2017

Appeals (1) from that part of a decision of the Workers’ Compensation Board, filed April 16, 2015, which assessed Frida Brown and Kenneth Brown with a penalty pursuant to Workers’ Compensation Law § 26-a (2) (b), and (2) … from a decision of said Board, filed July 9, 2015, which denied the Browns’ request for reconsideration and/or full Board review.

People v. Brown

22 A.D.3d 349 · Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · Oct 18, 2005

spatial and temporal factors, the fact that defendant was still in the undercover officer’s presence when the arresting officer arrived, and the fact that defendant was the only other person in the vicinity (see People v … [1986]; People v Massillon, 289 AD2d 103 , 104 [2001], lv denied 97 NY2d 731 [2002]).

People v. Brown

20 A.D.3d 487 · Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · Jul 11, 2005

Counsel’s application for leave to withdraw as counsel is granted (see Anders v California, 386 US 738 [1967]; People v Paige, 54 AD2d 631 [1976]; cf. People v Gonzalez, 47 NY2d 606 [1979]).

People v. Brown

18 A.D.3d 845 · Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · May 31, 2005

Counsel’s application for leave to withdraw as counsel is granted (see Anders v California, 386 US 738 [1967]; People v Paige, 54 AD2d 631 [1976]; cf. People v Gonzalez, 47 NY2d 606 [1979]).

People v. Brown

24 A.D.3d 792 · Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · Dec 27, 2005

Application by the appellant for a writ of error coram nobis to vacate, on the ground of ineffective assistance of appellate counsel, a decision and order of this Court dated May 3, 2004 (People v Brown, 7 AD3d 535 [2004] … The appellant has failed to establish that he was denied the *793 effective assistance of appellate counsel (see Jones v Barnes, 463 US 745 [1983]; People v Stultz, 2 NY3d 277 [2004]). H.

People v. Brown

2020 NY Slip Op 1458 · Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · Mar 3, 2020

People v Brown ( 2020 NY Slip Op 01458 ) People v Brown 2020 NY Slip Op 01458 Decided on March 3, 2020 Appellate Division, First Department Published by New York State Law Reporting Bureau pursuant to Judiciary Law § 431. … Decided on March 3, 2020 Renwick, J.P., Gische, Kern, Singh, JJ. 11160 1775/80 [*1] The People of the State of New York, Respondent, v Arthur Brown, Defendant-Appellant. Robert S.

People v. Brown

122 N.Y.S.3d 120 · Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · Mar 25, 2020

People v Brown ( 2020 NY Slip Op 02090 ) People v Brown 2020 NY Slip Op 02090 Decided on March 25, 2020 Appellate Division, Second Department Published by New York State Law Reporting Bureau pursuant to Judiciary Law § 431 … Decided on March 25, 2020 SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK Appellate Division, Second Judicial Department [*1]The People of the State of New York, respondent, v Anthony Brown, defendant.

People v. Brown

18 A.D.3d 280 · Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · May 12, 2005

Smith, 2 NY3d 8, 12 [2004]; People v Brown, 97 NY2d 500, 505-506 [2002]). … Were we to find any error, we would find it to be harmless in light of the overwhelming evidence of defendant’s guilt (see People v Crimmins, 36 NY2d 230 [1975]).

People v. Brown

24 A.D.3d 462 · Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · Dec 5, 2005

The defendant’s contention that the evidence was legally insufficient to establish his guilt is unpreserved for appellate review (see CPL 470.05 [2]; People v Hines, 97 NY2d 56, 61-62 [2001]; People v Gray, 86 NY2d 10 [1995 … In any event, viewing the evidence in the light most favorable to the prosecution (see People v Contes, 60 NY2d 620 [1983]), we find that it was legally sufficient to establish the defendant’s guilt beyond a reasonable doubt

People v. Brown

24 A.D.3d 188 · Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · Dec 8, 2005

The modified ruling was appropriate (see People v Hayes, 97 NY2d 203 [2002]; People v Walker, 83 NY2d 455, 458-459 [1994]; People v Pavao, 59 NY2d 282, 292 [1983]).

People v. Brown

180 A.D.3d 1107 · Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · Feb 28, 2020

People v Brown ( 2020 NY Slip Op 01439 ) People v Brown 2020 NY Slip Op 01439 Decided on February 28, 2020 Appellate Division, Second Department Published by New York State Law Reporting Bureau pursuant to Judiciary Law § … Decided on February 28, 2020 SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK Appellate Division, Second Judicial Department [*1]The People of the State of New York, respondent, v Omari Brown, appellant. (Ind.

People v. Brown

24 A.D.3d 462 · Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · Dec 5, 2005

Appeal by the appellant for a writ of error coram nobis to vacate, on the ground of ineffective assistance of appellate counsel, a decision and order of this Court dated February 22,1999 (People v Brown, 258 AD2d 661 [1999 … The appellant has failed to establish that he was denied the effective assistance of appellate counsel (see Jones v Barnes, 463 US 745 [1983]; People v Stultz, 2 NY3d 277 [2004]). Prudenti, P.J., Florio, H.

U.S. Bank N.A. v. Brown

186 A.D.3d 1038 · Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · Aug 20, 2020

Bank N.A. v Brown ( 2020 NY Slip Op 04653 ) U.S. … Brown and Susan L. Brown to dismiss the complaint against them.

People v. Brown

19 A.D.3d 305 · Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · Jun 28, 2005

Defendant knowingly and intelligently waived his right to appeal, and this waiver encompassed his excessive sentence claim (People v Hidalgo, 91 NY2d 733 [1998]; People v Seaberg, 74 NY2d 1, 9-10 [1989]). … We also note that there is no merit to the People’s assertion that defendant’s appeal should be dismissed on the basis of the waiver (People v Callahan, 80 NY2d 273, 285 [1992]).

People v. Brown

19 A.D.3d 612 · Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · Jun 20, 2005

Viewing the evidence in the light most favorable to the prosecution (see People v Contes, 60 NY2d 620 [1983]), we find that it was legally sufficient to establish the defendant’s guilt beyond a reasonable doubt.

People v. Brown

22 A.D.3d 595 · Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · Oct 11, 2005

Application by the *596 appellant for a writ of error coram nobis to vacate, on the ground of ineffective assistance of appellate counsel, a decision and order of this Court dated February 3, 2003 (People v Brown, 302 AD2d … The appellant has failed to establish that he was denied the effective assistance of appellate counsel (see Jones v Barnes, 463 US 745 [1983]; People v Stultz, 2 NY3d 277 [2004]).

People v. Brown

22 A.D.3d 237 · Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · Oct 6, 2005

To the extent the present record permits review, it establishes that defendant received effective assistance under both the state and federal standards (see People v Benevento, 91 NY2d 708, 713-714 [1998]; People v Ford, … 86 NY2d *238 397, 404 [1995]; see also Strickland v Washington, 466 US 668 [1984]).

People v. Brown

14 A.D.3d 712 · Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · Jan 31, 2005

Counsel’s application for leave to withdraw as counsel is granted (see Anders v California, 386 US 738 [1967]; People v Paige, 54 AD2d 631 [1976]; cf. People v Gonzalez, 47 NY2d 606 [1979]). H. Miller, J.P., S.

People v. Brown

17 A.D.3d 691 · Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · Apr 25, 2005

The defendant’s contention that the verdict is repugnant is also unpreserved for appellate review (see People v Alfaro, 66 NY2d 985, 987 [1985]; People v Satloff, 56 NY2d 745, 746 [1982]; People v Luke, 279 AD2d 534, 535 … [2001]) and, in any event, is without merit (see People v Goodfriend, 64 NY2d 695, 697 [1984]; People v Haymes, 34 NY2d 639, 640 [1974], cert denied 419 US 1003 [1974]; People v Menner, 2 AD3d 650, 651 [2003]; People v Holloway