Case law

People Ex Rel. Balcom v. . Mosher

163 N.Y. 32 · New York Court of Appeals · May 1, 1900

, and that board is virtually the appointing power.” … (Stuart v. Palmer, 74 N. Y. 183 ; Coxe v. State, 144 N. Y. 396 ; Gilman v. Tucker, 128 N. Y. 190 ; Colon v. Lisk, 153 N. Y. 188, 194 .)

Matter of Fox v. . Truslow Fulle, Inc.

236 N.Y. 634 · New York Court of Appeals · Jul 13, 1923

Fleming v. . Village of Suspension Bridge

92 N.Y. 368 · New York Court of Appeals · May 1, 1883

It will thus be seen from this analysis of the act that the board of water commissioners is not a corporation. There is no provision in the act authorizing the commissioners to sue or to be sued as a board. … The village became bound by their act, and for this conclusion the cases of Appleton v. The Water Commissioners ( 2 Hill, 432 ), Bailey v. The Mayor, etc., of New York (3 id. 531 ; S. C., 2 Denio, 433 ), and Sage v.

People v. Kling

14 N.Y.2d 571 · New York Court of Appeals · Feb 27, 1964

Order affirmed (People v. Tomaselli, 7 N Y 2d 350; People v. Brown, 7 N Y 2d 359). No opinion. Concur: Judges Dye, Van Voorhis, Burke and Scileppi. … Chief Judge Desmond and Judges Fuld and Bergan dissent and vote to reverse and order a hearing (see People v. Hairston, 10 N Y 2d 92; People v. Adams, 12 N Y 2d 417).

Decker v. Dundee Central School District

4 N.Y.2d 462 · New York Court of Appeals · Jun 25, 1958

The duty of the board as to supervision, unlike that of common school district trustees (§ 1604, subd. 8), is unqualified, and has been construed as mandatory (Selleck v. Board of Educ., 276 App. … Y. 764 ; Garber v. Central School Dist. No. 1, 251 App. Div. 214, 219-220 ; see Miller v. Board of Educ., 291 N. Y. 25, 31 ).

Germania Fire Insurance v. Home Insurance

144 N.Y. 195 · New York Court of Appeals · Dec 18, 1894

The first case is Hoffman v. Ætna Fire Ins. Co. ( 32 N. Y. 405 ). … (Drennen v. London Assurance Corporation, 20 Federal Rep. 657; Card v. Phœnix Ins. Co., 4 Missouri Appeals, 424; Malley v. Atlantic Fire and Marine Ins.

People v. James

99 N.Y.2d 264 · New York Court of Appeals · Dec 17, 2002

See, e.g., J.E.B. v. Alabama ex rel. T.B., 511 U.S. 127 (1994) (gender); Hernandez v. New York, 500 U.S. 352 (1991) (ethnic origin); Batson v. … J., and Titone, J., concurring]; People v Brown, 97 NY2d 500, 508 [2002] [Kaye, Ch. J., concurring, with Wesley and Rosenblatt, JJ., joining in the concurrence]).

People v. Pena

50 N.Y.2d 400 · New York Court of Appeals · Jun 10, 1980

Pena was then holding a knife inside a brown paper bag similar in appearance to the one which Irons had so recently seen in Turrell’s possession. … Davis v Alaska, 415 US 308 ; People v Gissendanner, 48 NY2d 543 ). Consequently, the point now raised was not preserved for review.

Matter of Kiriloff v. A.G.W. Wet Wash Laundry

293 N.Y. 222 · New York Court of Appeals · Jul 19, 1944

The case comes to us upon appeals by the Industrial Board and the Fund for Reopened Cases. … (Matter of Ryan v. American Bridge Co., 243 App. Div. 496, 499 , affd. 268 N. Y. 502 .)

Severnoe Securities Corp. v. London & Lancashire Insurance

255 N.Y. 120 · New York Court of Appeals · Jan 6, 1931

Of the board of directors of the Moscow company, a board consisting of five regular members and two alternate members, two only survive. … Co. v. Minnesota, 280 U. S. 204, 211, 217 ; Baldwin v. Missouri, 281 U. S. 586 ; Beidler v. South Carolina Tax Comm., 282 U. S. 1 ; Liverpool & London & Globe Ins. Co. v. Board of Assessors, 221 U.

In Re Laying Out of a Town Highway in the Town of Ballston

281 N.Y. 322 · New York Court of Appeals · Oct 17, 1939

New York & Queens Gas Co. v. McCall ( 219 N. Y. 84 ; affd., 245 U. S. 345 ). … Even in the McCall case we find a quotation from the Minnesota Supreme Court in State v. Great Northern Ry.

Balash v. New York City Employees' Retirement System

34 N.Y.2d 654 · New York Court of Appeals · Mar 29, 1974

, and advised of the reasons for their determination (Matter of Meschino v. … v.

Hays v. . Hathorn

74 N.Y. 486 · New York Court of Appeals · Oct 1, 1878

Brown v. Penfield ( 36 N. … In Allen v. Brown ( 44 N.

Ahsaf v. Nyquist

37 N.Y.2d 182 · New York Court of Appeals · Jun 12, 1975

We modify the order in the Appellate Division, however, and remit the case for further consideration by the Board of Regents. … This is another occasion in which judicial review is sought of an administrative determination in a disciplinary or regulatory proceeding — a subject to which we addressed ourselves in Matter of Pell v Board of Educ. ( 34

Whitaker v. Norman

75 N.Y.2d 779 · New York Court of Appeals · Dec 21, 1989

Healy Co., 8 NY2d 968 , affg 9 AD2d 938 ; Carpenter v Watkins Salt Co., 64 AD2d 330 ). … Section 435 does not, however, apply to the second category of sections within article 15 — encompassing a variety of regulations the Board might choose to formulate, including designation by the Board of responsible parties

Bank v. BD. OF EDUC. OF CITY OF NY

305 N.Y. 119 · New York Court of Appeals · Mar 5, 1953

305 N.Y. 119 (1953) Meyer Bank et al., Copartners Doing Business under the Name of Bank Electric Co., Appellants, v. Board of Education of the City of New York, Respondent. Court of Appeals of the State of New York. … R. v. United States ( 254 U.

In Re Proving the Last Will & Testament of Conway

124 N.Y. 455 · New York Court of Appeals · Mar 17, 1891

(Crossman v. Crossman, 95 N. Y. 145 ; Speake v. United States, 9 Cranch, 37 ; Bailey v. Taylor, 11 Conn. 531 ; Jarman on Wills, vol.. l',,p. 144.) … (Van Cortlandt v. Kip, 1 Hill, 590 ; Brown v. Clark, 77 N. Y. 369 ; Matter of Comrs. of Washington Park, 52 id. 131-134; Tonnele v. Hall, 4 N. Y. 145 ; Burton v. Newbery, E. R. [1 Ch.

People v. Rickert

58 N.Y.2d 122 · New York Court of Appeals · Feb 15, 1983

But long before then, it had a respected place in the common law (People v Clayton, 41 AD2d 204, 206 [Hopkins, J.]; see People v Quill, 11 Misc 2d 512, 513 [Sobel, J.]). … The fourth one, Brown, who had suffered a heart attack, had attempted to clear up his support arrears only to be repulsed by the District Attorney’s insistence on a finding of guilt.

Matter of Puentes v. Bd. of Educ. of Union Free Sch. Dist. No. 21 of Town of Bethpage

24 N.Y.2d 996 · New York Court of Appeals · May 28, 1969

Since the letter’s distribution was limited to the school system and the contents were arguably within the free speech protections laid down in Pickering v. Board of Educ. ( 391 U.

Fullam v. Kronman

26 N.Y.2d 725 · New York Court of Appeals · Jan 22, 1970