Case law

Matter of Kiriloff v. A.G.W. Wet Wash Laundry

293 N.Y. 222 · New York Court of Appeals · Jul 19, 1944

The case comes to us upon appeals by the Industrial Board and the Fund for Reopened Cases. … (Matter of Ryan v. American Bridge Co., 243 App. Div. 496, 499 , affd. 268 N. Y. 502 .)

Matter of Neglia v. . Zimmerman

237 N.Y. 131 · New York Court of Appeals · Nov 27, 1923

Y. v. Law ( 237 N. Y. 142 ) was a determination of the state tax commission annulled by the Appellate Division. … board.

Matter of Finegan v. Cohen

275 N.Y. 432 · New York Court of Appeals · Oct 19, 1937

The board of elections shall prepare and provide all necessary forms and equipment. … In the case of Matter of O’ Keeffe v. Finegan ( 275 N.

Perez v. City University of New York

5 N.Y.3d 522 · New York Court of Appeals · Nov 17, 2005

Under Education Law § 6204 (3) (a), CUNY Board meetings are subject to the Open Meetings Law. The CUNY Board has enacted its own bylaws to facilitate its mission. … Bookstores v Auxiliary Serv. Corp. of State Univ. of N.Y. at Farmingdale, 87 NY2d 410, 418 [1995]).

Scarsdale Supply Co. v. Village of Scarsdale

8 N.Y.2d 325 · New York Court of Appeals · Oct 21, 1960

(Ulmer Park Realty Co. v. City of *330 New York, 267 App. Div. 291, 293 .) The Zoning Board does not have the power to review the discretion of the Board of Trustees (Dowsey v. … Co. v. Thatcher, 278 N. Y. 222 ) and thereby correct errors of judgment in zoning. (Matter of Otto v. Steinhilber, 282 N. Y. 71 ; Blatter of Levy v. Board of Standards & Appeals, 267 N. Y. 347 .)

In Re Laying Out of a Town Highway in the Town of Ballston

281 N.Y. 322 · New York Court of Appeals · Oct 17, 1939

New York & Queens Gas Co. v. McCall ( 219 N. Y. 84 ; affd., 245 U. S. 345 ). … Even in the McCall case we find a quotation from the Minnesota Supreme Court in State v. Great Northern Ry.

Bennett v. . Buchan

76 N.Y. 386 · New York Court of Appeals · Mar 18, 1879

The rule is laid down in Williamson v. Brown, ( 15 N. … (See also Reed v. Gannon, 50 N. Y., 349, 350 ; Pendleton v. Gray, 2 Paige, 202 ; Hawley v. Cramer, 4 Cow., 717 ; Baker v. Bliss, 39 N. Y., 70 ; Brown v. Volkening, 64 id., 76 .)

Kingsley v. . City of Brooklyn

78 N.Y. 200 · New York Court of Appeals · Sep 17, 1879

(Shellington v. Howland, 53 N. Y., 372 ; Heine v. Meyer, 61 id., 171; Niblo v. Brinsse, 1 Keyes, 478 .) … (Bowery National Bank v. The Mayor, 63 N. Y., 339 ; McMahon v. Erie Railroad Co., 20 id., 463 ; Thomas v. Fleury, 26 id., 26.)

Haswell v. . Mayor, Etc., of City of New York

81 N.Y. 255 · New York Court of Appeals · Jun 1, 1880

(Palmer v. The Mayor, 2 Sandf. 318 ; Phœnix v. Supervisors of N. Y., 1 Hill, 362 ; Hatch v. Mann, 15 Wend. 44 .) … (People v. Lawrence, 6 Hill, 244 .) After the board had declared that there should be no salary paid, and that the office should be honorary, it had no lawful right to audit a bill for services subsequently performed.

Cohen v. Neustadter

247 N.Y. 207 · New York Court of Appeals · Jan 10, 1928

(Woollcott v. Shubert, 217 N. Y. 212 .) … (Fluegel v. Coudert, 244 N. Y. 393 ; Psota v. Long Island Railroad Co., 246 N. Y. 388 .)

Mize v. State Division of Human Rights

33 N.Y.2d 53 · New York Court of Appeals · Oct 18, 1973

Phillip Morris, Inc., 464 F. 2d 9 [6th Cir., 1971]; Robinson v. Lorillard Corp., 444 F. 2d 791 [4th Cir., 1971], cert. dsmd. 404 U. S. 1006 ). … Here there was none because of the board’s finding of no discrimination. * The scope of any such review by the board, however, would have been limited to whether the decision of the commissioner was “ arbitrary, capricious

Coane v. American Distilling Co.

298 N.Y. 197 · New York Court of Appeals · Jul 16, 1948

(See Shielcrawt v. Moffett, 294 N. Y. 180, 188-189 .) … (See Sialkot Importing Corp. v. Berlin, 295 N. Y. 482, 487 ; see, also, Turner v. American Metal Co., 268 App. Div. 239 ; Skinnell v. Mahoney, 197 App. Div. 808 ; see, also, United States v. Dunn, 268 U. S. 121 .)

People v. Pena

50 N.Y.2d 400 · New York Court of Appeals · Jun 10, 1980

Pena was then holding a knife inside a brown paper bag similar in appearance to the one which Irons had so recently seen in Turrell’s possession. … Davis v Alaska, 415 US 308 ; People v Gissendanner, 48 NY2d 543 ). Consequently, the point now raised was not preserved for review.

Bank v. BD. OF EDUC. OF CITY OF NY

305 N.Y. 119 · New York Court of Appeals · Mar 5, 1953

305 N.Y. 119 (1953) Meyer Bank et al., Copartners Doing Business under the Name of Bank Electric Co., Appellants, v. Board of Education of the City of New York, Respondent. Court of Appeals of the State of New York. … R. v. United States ( 254 U.

Claim of Chetney v. H. A. Manning Co.

273 N.Y. 82 · New York Court of Appeals · Jan 19, 1937

(Matter of Dubinsky v. Kofsky, 266 N. Y. 631 .) “ The decision of the board shall be final as to all questions of fact * * (Workmen’s Compensation Law [Cons. Laws, ch. 67], § 20.) … (Matter of Theyken v. Diplomat Products, Inc., 268 N. Y. 658 ; Matter of Kowalek v. New York Consolidated R. R. Co., 229 N. Y. 489 .)

Chambers v. Old Stone Hill Road Associates

1 N.Y.3d 424 · New York Court of Appeals · Feb 24, 2004

SiteTech Group Ltd. v Board of Zoning Appeals of Town of Brookhaven, 140 F Supp 2d 255, 264-265 [ED NY 2001] [upholding a zoning board’s denial of a special permit on the ground that there were alternative sites even though … In approving a special permit, a municipality determines only that the application complies with the municipality’s standards and conditions contained in the zoning ordinance (see Matter of North Shore Steak House v Board

Fe Bland v. Two Trees Management Co.

66 N.Y.2d 556 · New York Court of Appeals · Dec 19, 1985

On November 1, 1983 the board of directors, citing as its authorization for so doing article V, section 5 of the bylaws, amended the October 6, 1981 resolution to condition its approval of any assignment upon the payment … Special Term found that the board acted in good faith, that imposition of the fee was reasonably necessary in its business judgment and within the authority of the board under article V, section 5 of the bylaws, but held

In re the Arbitration between Candor Central School District & Candor Teachers Ass'n

42 N.Y.2d 266 · New York Court of Appeals · Jul 7, 1977

The grievance proceeded to arbitration and on January 29, 1975 the three-person board of review sustained Mrs. … Y. v Board of Higher Educ.. 39 NY2d 319, 323 ; Matter of Raisler Corp. [New York City Housing Auth.], 32 NY2d 274, 282 .)

Fullam v. Kronman

26 N.Y.2d 725 · New York Court of Appeals · Jan 22, 1970

Cuppy v. . Stollwerck Brothers

216 N.Y. 591 · New York Court of Appeals · Jan 11, 1916

(Martin v. N. Y. Life Ins. Co., 148 N. Y. 177 ; Watson v. Gugino, 204 N. Y. 535 .) The facts of this case as disclosed by the correspondence of the parties do not bring the case within the application of this rule. … (Trustees of Soldiers' Orphans' Home v. Shafer, 63 Ill. 243 ; Martino v. Commerce Fire Ins. Co., 15 J. & S. 520.)