Case law

Koch v. Mayor of New York

152 N.Y. 72 · New York Court of Appeals · Mar 2, 1897

III, § 1; Bank of Chenango v. Brown, 26 N. Y. 467 ; People ex rel. McLean v. Flagg, 46 N. Y. 401 .) … (Wenz ler v. People, supra; People ex rel. Gere v. Whitlock, 92 N. Y. 191 .)

Cohen v. Neustadter

247 N.Y. 207 · New York Court of Appeals · Jan 10, 1928

(Woollcott v. Shubert, 217 N. Y. 212 .) … (Fluegel v. Coudert, 244 N. Y. 393 ; Psota v. Long Island Railroad Co., 246 N. Y. 388 .)

Getman v. Niferopulos

276 N.Y. 161 · New York Court of Appeals · Nov 23, 1937

(Brown v. Goodwin, 75 N. Y. 409, 414 .) If the sale was valid, the two-year period within which the taxpayer had to redeem (Charter, § 108) had not expired before the commencement of this action. … (People v. Wemple, 61 Hun, 53 .)

Matter of City of N.Y. (Piers Old Nos. 8-11)

228 N.Y. 140 · New York Court of Appeals · Feb 24, 1920

Y. v. Hart, 95 N. Y. 443 .) … Y. 1 ); American Ice Company v. City of New York ( 217 N. Y. 402 ) and Bell v. City of New York ( 77 App.

Employees' Liability Assurance Corp. of London v. Hayes Construction Co.

243 N.Y. 261 · New York Court of Appeals · Jul 9, 1926

The Compensation Inspection Rating Board has been recognized by law as competent to fix rates for this class of insurance by and with the approval of the State Superintendent. (Peabody, Jr., & Co., Inc., v. … The Experience Rating Plan is one of the methods by which the Rating Board fixes the premiums for insurance according to the risk. The plan has the approval of the Insurance Department.

Klemann v. Acito

45 N.Y.2d 796 · New York Court of Appeals · Sep 1, 1978

Espada v. Diaz

98 N.Y.2d 717 · New York Court of Appeals · Sep 9, 2002

Howland v. . Edmonds

24 N.Y. 307 · New York Court of Appeals · Mar 5, 1862

The obligation to make payment in such cases was fully settled in this court in Deraismes v. The Merchants' Mutual Insurance Company (1 Comst., 371), and in Brown v. … Turnpike Company v.

Golata v. Mahoney

60 N.Y.2d 597 · New York Court of Appeals · Aug 30, 1983

OPINION OF THE COURT Order affirmed, without costs (Matter of Smith v Mahoney, 60 NY2d 596 ; Matter of Hutson v Bass, 54 NY2d 772 ). Concur: Chief Judge Cooke and Judges Jasen, Jones, Wachtler, Meyer and Simons.

McVeany v. Mayor, Aldermen & Commonalty

80 N.Y. 185 · New York Court of Appeals · Feb 24, 1880

Hatzel v. … Smith v.

People v. Bryce

88 N.Y.2d 124 · New York Court of Appeals · May 7, 1996

A motion to vacate a judgment based upon a claim of newly discovered evidence is addressed to the discretion of the lower courts (see, People v Brown, 56 NY2d 242, 246 ; People v Crimmins, 38 NY2d 407, 409 ). … Finally, whether there is any causal relation between the People’s actions and defendant’s ability to obtain exhumation earlier is a matter for the hearing court (cf., People v Brown, 67 NY2d 555 ).

Arverne Bay Construction Co. v. Thatcher

278 N.Y. 222 · New York Court of Appeals · May 24, 1938

Church v. Walsh, 244 N. Y. 280 .) … Albans-Springfield Corp. v.

Fe Bland v. Two Trees Management Co.

66 N.Y.2d 556 · New York Court of Appeals · Dec 19, 1985

On November 1, 1983 the board of directors, citing as its authorization for so doing article V, section 5 of the bylaws, amended the October 6, 1981 resolution to condition its approval of any assignment upon the payment … Special Term found that the board acted in good faith, that imposition of the fee was reasonably necessary in its business judgment and within the authority of the board under article V, section 5 of the bylaws, but held

Silsby Manufacturing Co. v. State of New York

104 N.Y. 562 · New York Court of Appeals · Mar 1, 1887

(Chenango Bridge Co. v. Paige, 83 N. Y. 178; Smith v. City of Rochester, 92 id. 463.) … J., in Sipple v. The State ( 99 N.

Augello v. Lindsay

32 N.Y.2d 621 · New York Court of Appeals · Mar 14, 1973

Cuppy v. . Stollwerck Brothers

216 N.Y. 591 · New York Court of Appeals · Jan 11, 1916

(Martin v. N. Y. Life Ins. Co., 148 N. Y. 177 ; Watson v. Gugino, 204 N. Y. 535 .) The facts of this case as disclosed by the correspondence of the parties do not bring the case within the application of this rule. … (Trustees of Soldiers' Orphans' Home v. Shafer, 63 Ill. 243 ; Martino v. Commerce Fire Ins. Co., 15 J. & S. 520.)

Parker v. Blauvelt Volunteer Fire Co.

93 N.Y.2d 343 · New York Court of Appeals · Apr 29, 1999

The Appellate Division confirmed the Board’s determination (Matter of Parker v Blauvelt Volunteer Fire Co., 222 AD2d 437 , lv denied 87 NY2d 812 ). … Board of Trustees, supra, 68 NY2d, at 705 [citing Davidson v Capuano, 792 F2d 275]).

Picariello v. Heffernan

303 N.Y. 625 · New York Court of Appeals · Oct 16, 1951

Kaufman v. Sarafan

59 N.Y.2d 855 · New York Court of Appeals · Jun 9, 1983

Since the purpose of the rule, as interpreted by the board, is to assist the stewards by discouraging disgruntled owners, trainers and jockeys from making vague and frivolous objections, it cannot be said that the board’s … Accordingly, the board’s interpretation of its own rule will not be disturbed. (Matter of Bernstein v Toia, 43 NY2d 437, 448 ; Ostrer v Schenck, 41 NY2d 782 , 786.)

Weisner v. 791 Park Avenue Corp.

6 N.Y.2d 426 · New York Court of Appeals · Jul 8, 1959

Connor v. Rochwoocl, 320 Mass. 360 ). … Rockwood, 320 Mass. 360 ; Livoli v.