Case law

Carey v. Westinghouse Electric Corp.

11 N.Y.2d 452 · New York Court of Appeals · Jul 6, 1962

Fink, Inc.], 2 N Y 2d 894; Steelworkers v. American Mfg. Co., 363 U. S. 564 ; Steelworkers v. Warrior & Gulf Co., 363 U. S. 574 ; Steelworkers v. Enterprise Corp., 363 U. S. 593 ). … While the Board’s decision is not the last word, it must assuredly be the first.

Engel v. Vitale

10 N.Y.2d 174 · New York Court of Appeals · Jul 7, 1961

In 1951 and again in 1955 the Board of Regents, governing body of our State public school system, recommended to all local school boards that “ at the commencement of each school day the act of allegiance to the Flag might … In construing even a Constitution some attention must be paid to the obvious intent of those who drafted it and adopted it (Matter of Carey v. Morton, 297 N. Y. 361 ).

McDonald v. . Mallory

77 N.Y. 546 · New York Court of Appeals · Sep 16, 1879

(Whitford v. Panama R. R. Co., 23 N. Y., 465; Crowley v. Panama R. R.. Co., 30 Barb., 99 ; Beach v. Bay State Steamboat Co., 30 id., 433; Vandeventer v. N. Y. and New Haven R. R. Co., 27 id., 244.) … (Steamboat Co. v. Chase, 16 Wall., 522, 530, 533 .) Indeed the United States Court of Admiralty would have no jurisdiction in such a case (Steamboat Co. v. Chase, 16 Wall., 522, 530, 533 ; Sherlock v. Allen, 93 U.

Getman v. Niferopulos

276 N.Y. 161 · New York Court of Appeals · Nov 23, 1937

(Brown v. Goodwin, 75 N. Y. 409, 414 .) If the sale was valid, the two-year period within which the taxpayer had to redeem (Charter, § 108) had not expired before the commencement of this action. … (People v. Wemple, 61 Hun, 53 .)

Cummings v. Regan

36 N.Y.2d 969 · New York Court of Appeals · Jun 17, 1975

If, after appearance before the board pursuant to subdivision four of this section, the prisoner is denied release on parole, the board shall inform such prisoner, in writing and within two weeks of such appearance, of the … In Matter of Cummings (Thomas) v Regan: Order reversed, without costs, and matter remitted to Supreme Court, Erie County, for further proceedings in accordance with the memorandum herein.

Employees' Liability Assurance Corp. of London v. Hayes Construction Co.

243 N.Y. 261 · New York Court of Appeals · Jul 9, 1926

The Compensation Inspection Rating Board has been recognized by law as competent to fix rates for this class of insurance by and with the approval of the State Superintendent. (Peabody, Jr., & Co., Inc., v. … The Experience Rating Plan is one of the methods by which the Rating Board fixes the premiums for insurance according to the risk. The plan has the approval of the Insurance Department.

Klemann v. Acito

45 N.Y.2d 796 · New York Court of Appeals · Sep 1, 1978

Augello v. Lindsay

32 N.Y.2d 621 · New York Court of Appeals · Mar 14, 1973

Espada v. Diaz

98 N.Y.2d 717 · New York Court of Appeals · Sep 9, 2002

Golata v. Mahoney

60 N.Y.2d 597 · New York Court of Appeals · Aug 30, 1983

OPINION OF THE COURT Order affirmed, without costs (Matter of Smith v Mahoney, 60 NY2d 596 ; Matter of Hutson v Bass, 54 NY2d 772 ). Concur: Chief Judge Cooke and Judges Jasen, Jones, Wachtler, Meyer and Simons.

People v. Bryce

88 N.Y.2d 124 · New York Court of Appeals · May 7, 1996

A motion to vacate a judgment based upon a claim of newly discovered evidence is addressed to the discretion of the lower courts (see, People v Brown, 56 NY2d 242, 246 ; People v Crimmins, 38 NY2d 407, 409 ). … Finally, whether there is any causal relation between the People’s actions and defendant’s ability to obtain exhumation earlier is a matter for the hearing court (cf., People v Brown, 67 NY2d 555 ).

MATTER OF NEW YORK CITY HOUS. & REDEVELOPMENT BD. v. Foley

16 N.Y.2d 1071 · New York Court of Appeals · Dec 1, 1965

16 N.Y.2d 1071 (1965) In the Matter of the New York City Housing and Redevelopment Board, Appellant, v. Max H. Foley et al., Constituting the Board of Standards and Appeals of the City of New York, et al., Respondents. … In the Matter of Amalia V. Betanzos et al., Appellants, v. Max H. Foley et al., Constituting the Board of Standards and Appeals of the City of New York, et al., Respondents. Court of Appeals of the State of New York.

Banister v. Gray

261 N.Y. 445 · New York Court of Appeals · Apr 11, 1933

(Rood v. Railway P. & F. C. Mut. Ben. Assn., 31 Fed. Rep. 62; Van Poucke v. Netherland St. Vincent de Paul Soc., 63 Mich. 378 ; Anacosta Tribe v. Murbach, 13 Md. 91 ; Grand Lodge, Brotherhood of Railroad Trainmen v. … Nolan, 196 Ky. 296 ; Rieden v. Brotherhood of Railroad Trainmen, [Tex. Civ. App.] 184 S. W. Rep. 689 ; Kelly v. Brotherhood of Railroad Trainmen, 308 Ill. 508 .)

People v. Foster

19 N.Y.2d 150 · New York Court of Appeals · Feb 23, 1967

The defendant relies upon People v. Brown (21 A D 2d 738) in support of his position. … In People v.

Clients' Security Fund v. Grandeau

72 N.Y.2d 62 · New York Court of Appeals · Jun 30, 1988

The Fund is administered by a seven-member Board of Trustees (the Board), appointed by the Court of Appeals. … Co. v Smith Co., 46 NY2d 498, 504 ; see generally, 57 NY Jur, Subrogation, §§ 15, 26).

Davidson v. . Village of White Plains

197 N.Y. 266 · New York Court of Appeals · Jan 11, 1910

Y. 585 ) and Swift v. Mayor, etc., of N. Y. ( 83 N. Y. 528 ). … Under the statutory scheme the board of education was to deliver to the creditor its draft on the comptroller, who was required to pay the same if there were funds to the credit of the board sufficient for the purpose.

Koch v. Mayor of New York

152 N.Y. 72 · New York Court of Appeals · Mar 2, 1897

III, § 1; Bank of Chenango v. Brown, 26 N. Y. 467 ; People ex rel. McLean v. Flagg, 46 N. Y. 401 .) … (Wenz ler v. People, supra; People ex rel. Gere v. Whitlock, 92 N. Y. 191 .)

Cuomo v. Long Island Lighting Co.

71 N.Y.2d 349 · New York Court of Appeals · Feb 17, 1988

The Atomic Safety and Licensing Appeal Board affirmed. … Assn. v Chu (supra), and NYPIRG v Carey (supra).

People v. Richmond County News, Inc.

9 N.Y.2d 578 · New York Court of Appeals · May 25, 1961

John-Stevas, Obscenity and the Law [1956], p. 196; see, also, Brown v. Kingsley Books , 1 N Y 2d 177, 181, n. 3 [affd. sub nom. Kingsley Books v. Brown, 354 U. S. 436 ]; United. States v. … As we wrote in Brown v.

Lyman v. . Village of Potsdam

228 N.Y. 398 · New York Court of Appeals · Apr 13, 1920

(Callanan v. Gilman, 107 N. Y. 360 ; Jorgensen v. Squires, 144 N. Y. 280 ; Tolman & Co. v. City of Chicago, 240 Ill. 268 .) … Y. 278 ; Weston v. City of Troy, 139 N. Y. 281 ; Farley v. Mayor, etc., of N. Y., 152 N. Y. 222 ; Simonds v. Maine Telephone & Tel. Co., 104 Me. 440 ; Horr v. New York, N. H. & H. R. R.