Case law
Opinions from 1658 to today.
10,000+ results
1.17s
10 N.Y.2d 174 · New York Court of Appeals · Jul 7, 1961
In 1951 and again in 1955 the Board of Regents, governing body of our State public school system, recommended to all local school boards that “ at the commencement of each school day the act of allegiance to the Flag might … In construing even a Constitution some attention must be paid to the obvious intent of those who drafted it and adopted it (Matter of Carey v. Morton, 297 N. Y. 361 ).
Cited 6 timesPublishedPeople Ex Rel. Unger v. . Kennedy
207 N.Y. 533 · New York Court of Appeals · Mar 14, 1913
In Starin v. … In Clarke v.
Cited 41 timesPublishedWiltwyck School for Boys, Inc. v. Hill
11 N.Y.2d 182 · New York Court of Appeals · Apr 5, 1962
Y. 171, 176 ). *194 In Rogers v. Association for Help of Retarded Children ( 308 N. … In Incorporated Vil. of Brookville v.
Cited 20 timesPublishedMATTER OF NEW YORK CITY HOUS. & REDEVELOPMENT BD. v. Foley
16 N.Y.2d 1071 · New York Court of Appeals · Dec 1, 1965
16 N.Y.2d 1071 (1965) In the Matter of the New York City Housing and Redevelopment Board, Appellant, v. Max H. Foley et al., Constituting the Board of Standards and Appeals of the City of New York, et al., Respondents. … In the Matter of Amalia V. Betanzos et al., Appellants, v. Max H. Foley et al., Constituting the Board of Standards and Appeals of the City of New York, et al., Respondents. Court of Appeals of the State of New York.
Cited 4 timesPublished146 N.Y. 357 · New York Court of Appeals · Jun 14, 1895
This result was reached by the application of a principle well settled by a class of cases of which McKenna v. Edmundstone ( 91 N. … duties as the board of estimate and apportionment in Mew York.
Cited 15 timesPublishedIn THE MATTER OF GRAHAM v. Pathways, Inc.
1 N.Y.3d 564 · New York Court of Appeals · Dec 23, 2003
Cited 0 timesPublished11 N.Y.3d 527 · New York Court of Appeals · Dec 17, 2008
At the time of his application in May 2006, defendant had been denied parole release and was scheduled to appear before the parole board again in April 2008” (People v Mills, 48 AD3d 1108 [4th Dept 2008] [internal quotation … Parris, 35 AD3d 891, 892 [2d Dept 2006]; People v Thomas, 35 AD3d 895, 896 [3d Dept 2006]; People v Smith, 45 AD3d 1478 [4th Dept 2007]).
Cited 32 timesPublishedIn Re the Arbitration Between the Board of Education & Middle Island Teachers Ass'n
50 N.Y.2d 426 · New York Court of Appeals · May 29, 1980
of Cohoes City School Dist. v Cohoes Teachers Assn., supra, p 778; see, also, Matter of South Colonie Cent. … School Dist. v Longo, 43 NY2d 136 ; Board of Educ. v Bellmore-Merrick United Secondary Teachers, 39 NY2d 167 ).
Cited 15 timesPublishedWard v. International Railway Co.
206 N.Y. 83 · New York Court of Appeals · Jun 29, 1912
Y. 104 ; Mills v. Woolverton, 9 App. Div. 82 ; Miller v. Uvalde Asphalt Paving Co., 134 App. Div. 212 ; Spofford v. Harlow, 85 Mass. 176 .) … (Chapman v. New Haven Railroad Co., 19 N. Y. 341 ; Little v. Hackett, 116 U. S. 366 ; Bennett v. New Jersey R. R. & T. Co., 36 N. J. L. 225.)
Cited 7 timesPublishedPeople Ex Rel. Carlisle v. . Bd. of Supervisors
217 N.Y. 424 · New York Court of Appeals · Mar 14, 1916
(Farrell v. Town of North Salem, 205 N. T. 453, 456.) … (Farrell v. Town of North Salem, supra, at pages 456, 457.) Section 134 has no relation to the duty of the board of supervisors to raise the expenses of maintaining the highway before its acceptance by the state.
Cited 7 timesPublished303 N.Y. 300 · New York Court of Appeals · Oct 18, 1951
A., v. Wisconsin Employment Relations Bd. ( 336 U. … Nevertheless the conduct here described is not forbidden by this Act and no proceeding is authorized by which the Federal Board may deal with it in any manner.” Again, in Algoma Plywood & Veneer Co. v.
Cited 100 timesPublished43 N.Y.2d 48 · New York Court of Appeals · Nov 17, 1977
This is another of the several cases which collectively describe the maze which must be followed by teachers and boards of education alike through the interrelated provisions of the Education Law when the board in a bona … Perhaps even more to the point, the result in this case underscores the invitation stated elsewhere to legislative review of the applicable sections of the Education Law (Matter of Amos v Board of Educ., 43 NY2d 706 , decided
Cited 38 timesPublished80 N.Y.2d 783 · New York Court of Appeals · Jun 4, 1992
Petitioner consequently applied to respondent Zoning Board of Appeals of the Town of Islip (Board) for the appropriate variances. … Aubin v Flacke, 68 NY2d 66, 77 [emphasis added]; see also, Spears v Berle, 48 NY2d 254, 263 ; Matter of National Merritt v Weist, 41 NY2d 438 , 445).
Cited 16 timesPublishedMatter of Malone v. Vrd Decorating
14 N.Y.3d 825 · New York Court of Appeals · Apr 6, 2010
Cited 0 timesPublishedMatter of Madura v. . City of New York
238 N.Y. 214 · New York Court of Appeals · May 13, 1924
(Jackson v. Wisconsin Tel. Co., 88 Wis. 243 ; Starr v. South. Bell Tel., etc., Co., 156 N. C. 435 .) … (Kelly v. Kerry C. C., 1 B. W. C. C. 194; Wiggins v. Ind. Acc. Bd., 54 Mont. 335 ; Hoenig v. Ind. Comm., 159 Wis. 646 ; Klawinski v. L. S. & M. S. Ry. Co., 185 Mich. 643 .)
Cited 34 timesPublishedHomin v. Cleveland & Whitehill Co.
281 N.Y. 484 · New York Court of Appeals · Nov 21, 1939
Various means are specified in the Rules of the Industrial Board. Violation of the statute and the Industrial Code or the Rules of the Industrial Board is a penal offense (Penal Law, § 1275). … But violation of a rule of the Board constitutes some evidence of negligence only (Teller v. Prospect Heights Hospital, supra).
Cited 21 timesPublishedCuomo v. Long Island Lighting Co.
71 N.Y.2d 349 · New York Court of Appeals · Feb 17, 1988
The Atomic Safety and Licensing Appeal Board affirmed. … Assn. v Chu (supra), and NYPIRG v Carey (supra).
Cited 108 timesPublished67 N.Y.2d 672 · New York Court of Appeals · Feb 4, 1986
We cannot agree, however, with *674 the respondent Acting Commissioner’s interpretation that the scope of a board of education’s statutory authority allows a board to disseminate information, at the taxpayers’ expense, patently … or to promote voting on any issue may be undertaken, provided it is not to persuade nor to convey favoritism, partisanship, partiality, approval or disapproval by a State agency of any issue, worthy as it may be” (Stern v
Cited 19 timesPublished600 West 115th Street Corp. v. Von Gutfeld
80 N.Y.2d 130 · New York Court of Appeals · Oct 20, 1992
Von Gutfeld had served as president of the condominium’s Board of Managers from March 1985 to June 1988, and at the time of the hearing in October 1988 he was a member of the Board’s Building Committee. … Following the meeting, the Community Board voted against plaintiff’s application.
Cited 146 timesPublishedIn the Matter of the Application of Church
92 N.Y. 1 · New York Court of Appeals · Mar 20, 1883
The case of Stuart v. Palmer ( 74 N. … The difficulty and uncertainty of payment commented upon in Chapman v. Gates ( 54 N. Y. 145 ) and Sage v.
Cited 57 timesPublished
Ask Donna