Case law

Opinions from 1658 to today.

Filtersny

10,000+ results

1.51s

  • Matter of Chernin v. Progress Serv. Co., Inc.

    9 N.Y.2d 880 · New York Court of Appeals · Apr 27, 1961

    Cited 5 timesPublished
  • Allen v. Adami

    39 N.Y.2d 275 · New York Court of Appeals · Apr 8, 1976

    (Matter of Soros v Board of Appeals of Vil. of Southampton, 50 Misc 2d 205, 208 , affd without opn 27 AD2d 705 .) … (E.g., Matter of Soros v Board of Appeals of Vil. of Southampton, 50 Misc 2d 205, 208 , affd without opn 27 AD2d_705, supra; Matter of Feldman v Commerdinger, 26 Misc 2d 221, 222 ; Matter of Fina Homes v Beckel, 24 Misc 2d

    Cited 51 timesPublished
  • Ferris v. Sadowski

    45 N.Y.2d 815 · New York Court of Appeals · Sep 1, 1978

    On July 27, 1978 two petitions were filed with the New York City Board of Elections, each designating Ferris as a candidate for re-election. … (See Matter of Rosen v McNab, 25 NY2d 798 ; but, compare, Matter of Bayne v Sachs, 41 NY2d 1042 [denial of validation based in part on failure of candidate to list address].)

    Cited 34 timesPublished
  • Corcoran v. Banner Super Market, Inc.

    19 N.Y.2d 425 · New York Court of Appeals · Apr 20, 1967

    The board which fell upon the plaintiff was five and one-half inches wide. It stood on top of another board and together the two boards filled in the five and one-half-inch space between 2052 and 2054 Flatbush Avenue. … In Ybarra v.

    Modified on other grounds by Corcoran v. Banner Super Market, Inc., 21 N.Y.2d 793 (1968)Cited 97 timesPublished
  • Albright v. Town of Manlius

    28 N.Y.2d 108 · New York Court of Appeals · Mar 3, 1971

    Those difficulties were examined in Udell v. Haas (21 N Y 2d 463). … Indeed, many of the conditions followed recommendations of the Onondaga County Planning Board. No prejudice, therefore, has been shown by plaintiffs in the imposition of the conditions which, here, as in Church v.

    Cited 12 timesPublished
  • Matter of Schell

    76 N.Y. 432 · New York Court of Appeals · Mar 18, 1879

    (Tone v. The Mayor, etc., 70 N. Y., 157 .) … That board does not act as assessors. It has no power to make assessments. It can only review assessments made by the board of assessors ; and if it finds no errors, it must confirm the assessments, as made.

    Cited 5 timesPublished
  • People ex rel. Robertson v. New York State Division

    67 N.Y.2d 197 · New York Court of Appeals · Apr 3, 1986

    Diamond v Flood ( 100 AD2d 604, 605 ), in which it remitted to the Parole Board a prompt hearing question and noted "that, in the future, parolees will not be permitted to obtain judicial review of claims of a denial of a … Council of Teachers v Board of Coop. Educ. Servs., 63 NY2d 100, 103 ).

    Cited 26 timesPublished
  • Cohn v. Borchard Affiliations

    25 N.Y.2d 237 · New York Court of Appeals · Jul 1, 1969

    (See Mulinos v. Coliseum Constr. Corp., 22 A D 2d 163; Brown v. Weissberg, 22 A D 2d 282.) … (See Foisy v. Penn Aluminum, 31 A D 2d 783 [4th Dept.]; Williams v. Baker, 29 A D 2d 915 [4th Dept.]; Goldberg v. Schwartz, 29 A D 2d 873 [2d Dept.]; Terasaka v. Rehfield, 28 A D 2d 1011 [2d Dept]; Kaprow v.

    Cited 66 timesPublished
  • Weinrib v. Weisler

    27 N.Y.2d 592 · New York Court of Appeals · Jun 3, 1970

    Cited 9 timesPublished
  • State Division of Human Rights v. Genesee Hospital

    50 N.Y.2d 113 · New York Court of Appeals · Apr 29, 1980

    Administrative agencies " 'have no authority to create a rule out of harmony with the statute’ ” (Finger Lakes Racing Assn. v New York State Racing & Wagering Bd., 45 NY2d 471, 480-481 , quoting Matter of Jones v Berman, … No. 6 of Towns of Islip & Smithtown v New York State Human Rights Appeal Bd., 35 NY2d 371, 381 ).

    Cited 23 timesPublished
  • Marro v. Bartlett

    46 N.Y.2d 674 · New York Court of Appeals · Mar 29, 1979

    No hearing had been held and no reasons were given for the board’s action. … (Cf. *683 Board of Regents v Roth, 408 US 564 .) Specifically, appellant was not entitled to a predetermination hearing or to any statement of the reasons for the action of the Administrative Board.

    Cited 20 timesPublished
  • General Electric Co. v. Town of Salina

    69 N.Y.2d 730 · New York Court of Appeals · Dec 19, 1986

    Srogi, 52 NY2d 496, 510 ; G.R.F., Inc. v Board of Assessors, 41 NY2d 512 , 513), and where, as here, evidence of a recent sale price is lacking, market value may be determined with reference to recent sales of comparable … properties (Matter of Merrick Holding Corp. v Board of Assessors, 45 NY2d 538 ; Matter of Great Atl. & Pac.

    Cited 40 timesPublished
  • MATTER OF ROMA v. Ruffo

    92 N.Y.2d 489 · New York Court of Appeals · Nov 18, 1998

    Under a reopener clause, the statutory duty to bargain is revived, along with the statutory machinery for resolution of an impasse discussed in Matter of City of Newburgh v Newman (supra) (see, Matter of Board of Educ. … Assn., Local 1000 v New York State Pub. Empl.

    Cited 23 timesPublished
  • Donovan v. . McAlpin

    85 N.Y. 185 · New York Court of Appeals · Apr 19, 1881

    J., in Hall v. … J., in Bailey v.

    Cited 13 timesPublished
  • Sil-Tone Collision, Inc. v. Foschio

    63 N.Y.2d 406 · New York Court of Appeals · Nov 27, 1984

    The scope of review of the Review Board upon appeal is defined by section 398-f (subd 3, par [a]), which provides: “The review board will review all appeals filed pursuant to this article and will make recommendations to … Sta. v New York State Dept, of Motor Vehicles, 92 AD2d 688 ; Greater Boston Tel. Corp. v Federal Communication Comm., 444 F2d 841, 853, cert den 403 US 923 .)

    Cited 9 timesPublished
  • Kahlen v. . State of New York

    223 N.Y. 383 · New York Court of Appeals · May 14, 1918

    (Rexford v. Knight, supra; Sweet v. Rechel, 159 U. S. 380, 404 ; Crozier v. Krupp, 224 U. S. 290, 305, 306 .) No other limitations are placed upon the right to take. … (Hellen v. City of Medford, 188 Mass. 42 ; Kelly v. City of Waterbury, 83 Conn. 270 ; Wood v. Trustees of State Hospital, 164 Penn. St. 159.)

    Cited 49 timesPublished
  • People Ex Rel. Bast v. . Voorhis

    227 N.Y. 167 · New York Court of Appeals · Oct 21, 1919

    Lempp v. Board of Elections, N. Y. Law Journal, Sept. 30, 1918.) The order entered thereon was on appeal affirmed by the Appellate Division (People ex rel. Lempp v. Board of Elections, 185 App. … Lempp v. Board of Elections, 224 N.

    Cited 4 timesPublished
  • Matter of Kransdorf v. Bd. of Educ. of the Northport-E. Northport Union Free Sch. Dist.

    81 N.Y.2d 871 · New York Court of Appeals · Mar 30, 1993

    That court also denied the Board’s motion for reargument. The Appellate Division affirmed unanimously (Matter of Kransdorf v Board of Educ., 181 AD2d 771 ). This Court granted the Board’s motion for leave to appeal. … Board of Educ., 51 NY2d 855, 857 ).

    Cited 10 timesPublished
  • Claim of the State Treasurer v. West Side Trucking Co.

    233 N.Y. 202 · New York Court of Appeals · Apr 18, 1922

    (Matter of State Industrial Commission v. Newman, 222 N. Y. 363 .) … (Matter of Belcher v. Carthage Machine Co., 224 N. Y. 326 ; Matter of Hansen v. Turner Construction Co., 224 N. Y. 331 ; Matter of Carroll v. Knickerbocker Ice Co., supra.)

    Cited 24 timesPublished
  • Abco Bus Co. v. Macchiarola

    52 N.Y.2d 938 · New York Court of Appeals · Feb 12, 1981

    Cited 28 timesPublished

Ask Donna

Ask Donna

A word about cookies

We need a few to keep you signed in and the library working. The rest help us see which pages people use and where they get stuck. They stay off unless you say yes.