Case law

New York City Health & Hospitals Corp. v. New York State Commission of Correction

19 N.Y.3d 239 · New York Court of Appeals · May 8, 2012

Within the Commission there is a Medical Review Board (the Board) (Correction Law § 43) composed in significant part of duly licensed medical doctors, including a board certified pathologist and psychiatrist (Correction Law … In Matter of Camperlengo v Blum ( 56 NY2d 251 [1982]), we implied such an exception to allow the State Department of Social Services to subpoena otherwise privileged medical records from a health care provider in pursuance

Barby Land Corp. v. Ziegner

49 N.Y.2d 729 · New York Court of Appeals · Feb 5, 1980

Chazon, LLC v. Maugenest

19 N.Y.3d 410 · New York Court of Appeals · Jun 7, 2012

The deadlines for compliance have been extended several times (see Multiple Dwelling Law § 284 [1] [ii]-[v]). … By 1989, when the law had been in effect seven years, Justice Ostrau of the Appellate Term, dissenting in 902 Assoc. v Total Picture Creative Servs. ( 144 Misc 2d 316, 320 [App Term, 1st Dept 1989]), said that “[v]ery few

Warren Brothers Co. v. . City of New York

190 N.Y. 297 · New York Court of Appeals · Dec 20, 1907

(Rose v. Low, 85 App. Div. 461 ; Barber Asphalt Co. v. City of New York, 86 App. Div. 617 .) Mr. Justice Ingraham writing for a unanimous court in Rose v. … Court in the case of Barber Asphalt Co. v.

Swift v. Lefever

60 N.Y.2d 762 · New York Court of Appeals · Oct 20, 1983

Greene v. Mayor

15 N.Y. 303 · New York Court of Appeals · Mar 30, 1875

In the case of The People v. … By section 4, of that act the Croton aqueduct board thereby created was vested with the powers conferred upon the former Croton aqueduct board, by the amended charter of 1849 (Laws of 1849, chap. 383, § 15), viz., to have

Wachtel v. Tabulating Card Salvage

22 N.Y.2d 962 · New York Court of Appeals · Oct 17, 1968

People Ex Rel. Youngblood v. . Asten

62 N.Y. 624 · New York Court of Appeals · Jun 1, 1875

Ward v. Asten et al. (ante, page 623). All concur. Order affirmed.

Kelly v. Murphy

20 N.Y.2d 205 · New York Court of Appeals · Jul 7, 1967

In Matter of Evans v. Monaghan ( 306 N. … In Boeing Airplane Co. v.

Slavin v. . State

152 N.Y. 45 · New York Court of Appeals · Mar 2, 1897

The board apparently concluded that there was no loss of rental value, and made the award of twenty-five dollars to cover the expense of gravelling the cellar. We think the board erred in respect to the rule of damages. … (See Barrick v. Schiffe *49 rdecker, 123 N. Y. 52 ; Seely v. Alden, 61 Pa. St. 302; Holt v. Sargent, 15 Gray, 97 .)

Fisher v. Kelly

289 N.Y. 161 · New York Court of Appeals · Oct 16, 1942

The challenge by the Mayor of the validity of the local law amending the City Charter is based upon the contention that, since public health is a -matter of State concern (Adler v. Deegan, 251 N. Y. 467 ; Robertson v. … In villages the board of health shall consist of the board of trustees of such village.

Albright v. Town of Manlius

28 N.Y.2d 108 · New York Court of Appeals · Mar 3, 1971

Those difficulties were examined in Udell v. Haas (21 N Y 2d 463). … Indeed, many of the conditions followed recommendations of the Onondaga County Planning Board. No prejudice, therefore, has been shown by plaintiffs in the imposition of the conditions which, here, as in Church v.

Hadden v. Consolidated Edison Co.

34 N.Y.2d 88 · New York Court of Appeals · May 1, 1974

(See, e.g., Baltimore County Bd. of Trustees of Employees’ Retirement System v. Comes, 247 Md. 182 ; Van Coppenolle v. City of Detroit, 313 Mich. 580 ; Fromm v. Board of Directors, 81 N. J. Super. 138.) … Hosley v. Black, 28 N. Y. 438, 443 ; Hong v. Independent School Dist., 181 Minn. 309 .)

Franchise Realty Interstate Corp. v. Cohalan

54 N.Y.2d 643 · New York Court of Appeals · Jun 29, 1981

People v. Wirchansky

41 N.Y. 130 · New York Court of Appeals · Dec 22, 1976

People v Davis, 36 NY2d 280 ; People v Brown, 32 NY2d 172, 174 ). … (People v Brown, 24 NY2d 421, 424 .)

Cirale v. 80 Pine Street Corp.

35 N.Y.2d 113 · New York Court of Appeals · Jul 15, 1974

(See People, v. Keating, supra, at p. 153 .) … (See United States v. Reynolds, supra; Stratford Factors v. New York State Banking Dept., supra.) However, it will be the rare case that in camera determinations will be necessary.

Claim of Petterson v. Daystrom Corp.

17 N.Y.2d 32 · New York Court of Appeals · Feb 17, 1966

(People v. Ryan, 274 N. Y. 149, 152 ; see, also, Matter of United Press Assns. v. Valente, supra, 308 N. Y. 71, 83-84 ; Matter of River Brand Rice Mills v. Latrobe Brewing Co., 305 N. … Nothing decided or said in Matter of Meachem v. New York Cent. R. R. Co. (8 N Y 2d 293), or the other cases to which the board calls attention, requires a contrary result.

MATTER OF ROMA v. Ruffo

92 N.Y.2d 489 · New York Court of Appeals · Nov 18, 1998

Under a reopener clause, the statutory duty to bargain is revived, along with the statutory machinery for resolution of an impasse discussed in Matter of City of Newburgh v Newman (supra) (see, Matter of Board of Educ. … Assn., Local 1000 v New York State Pub. Empl.

Furniss v. . Ferguson

15 N.Y. 437 · New York Court of Appeals · Jun 5, 1857

proportion of the whole amount which he would be entitled to recover upon the failure of the title to the entire property, as the value of that portion of the title which has failed bears to the value of the whole. ( Morris v. … BROWN, J., did not hear the argument, and took no part in the decision. New trial ordered. *Page 444

Matter of Schell

76 N.Y. 432 · New York Court of Appeals · Mar 18, 1879

(Tone v. The Mayor, etc., 70 N. Y., 157 .) … That board does not act as assessors. It has no power to make assessments. It can only review assessments made by the board of assessors ; and if it finds no errors, it must confirm the assessments, as made.