Case law

Phillips v. Dennison

9 N.Y.3d 956 · New York Court of Appeals · Oct 23, 2007

Armitage v. . MacE

96 N.Y. 538 · New York Court of Appeals · Oct 7, 1884

(Phil lips v. Wooster, 36 N. Y. 412 ; Rawson v. Pa. R. R. Co., 48 id. 216 ; Whiton v. Snyder, 88 id. 299.) But it is denied that a valid gift of the mare was made. … It was not an agreement for the board of the horse, and he did not, within the meaning of the statute, board her.

Matter of Amedure v. State of New York

2024 NY Slip Op 05425 · New York Court of Appeals · Oct 31, 2024

Matter of Amedure v State of New York ( 2024 NY Slip Op 05425 ) Matter of Amedure v State of New York 2024 NY Slip Op 05425 Decided on October 31, 2024 Court of Appeals Per Curiam Published by New York State Law Reporting … Argus Co. v Bresler , 171 NY 302, 309 [1902]). That may be true.

Matter of Chernin v. Progress Serv. Co., Inc.

9 N.Y.2d 880 · New York Court of Appeals · Apr 27, 1961

Matter of Kransdorf v. Bd. of Educ. of the Northport-E. Northport Union Free Sch. Dist.

81 N.Y.2d 871 · New York Court of Appeals · Mar 30, 1993

That court also denied the Board’s motion for reargument. The Appellate Division affirmed unanimously (Matter of Kransdorf v Board of Educ., 181 AD2d 771 ). This Court granted the Board’s motion for leave to appeal. … Board of Educ., 51 NY2d 855, 857 ).

Claim of Buxbaum v. Cumberland Provision Co.

12 N.Y.2d 670 · New York Court of Appeals · Sep 27, 1962

The People Ex Rel. Dannat v. . Comptroller

77 N.Y. 45 · New York Court of Appeals · Apr 8, 1879

(Edwards on Bills, § 143; Parker v. City of Syracuse, 31 N. Y., 376 ; Hall v. City of Buffalo, 1 Keyes, 193 ; Stover v. Sherman, 3 id., 620; Field v. Mayor, etc., 2 Seld., 179; Attorney-General v. … (People v. Stout, 23 Barb., 338 , by Davis, J. ; Hohl v. Town of Westford, 33 Wis., 324 ; Campbell v Polk, 3 Iowa, 467 ; Lansing v. Van Gorder, 24 Mich., 456 ; Risley v. Smith, 64 N. Y., 570 .)

People v. North River Sugar Refining Co.

121 N.Y. 582 · New York Court of Appeals · Jun 24, 1890

As was said in People ex rel. v. K. & M. T. R. … Co. v. F. Bank, 7 Wend. 412 ; Clearwater v. Meredith, 1 Wall. 29 ; Whittenton Mills v. Upton, 10 Gray, 596 .) The case last cited furnishes the reasons with precision and at length.

Welsh v. . Taylor

134 N.Y. 450 · New York Court of Appeals · Oct 1, 1892

Brown, J. The judgment in this action was first reversed by the General Term, but upon a reargument it was affirmed. The final decision of the court rested upon the authority of Snell v. Levitt ( 110 N. … (Pope v. Devereux, 5 Gray, 409 ; The Queen v. Chorley, L. R. [12 Q. B.] 519; Moore v. Rawson, 3 B. & C. 322; Dyer v. Sanford, 9 Met. 395 ; Veghte v. Raritan Water Power Co., 4 C. E. Green, 143; Crain v.

Vitale v. City of New York

60 N.Y.2d 861 · New York Court of Appeals · Nov 22, 1983

City of New York, 53 AD2d 528 , affd 42 NY2d 831 ; Bass v City of New York, 38 AD2d 407 , affd 32 NY2d 894 ; Riss v City of New York, 22 NY2d 579 ). … It is his contention, however, that a special relationship was created between him and the board of education when the security plan was adopted and that the board breached its special duty of care to him when it failed to

First Trust & Deposit Co. v. Goodrich

3 N.Y.2d 410 · New York Court of Appeals · Jul 3, 1957

In the cases of Seiter v. Straub ( 1 Dem. 264 , 269) and Lamar v. Micou ( 112 U. … Cases such as Matter of Rothfeld v. Graves ( 264 App. Div. 54 , affd. 289 N. Y. 583 ) or Matter of Ratkowsky v. Browne ( 267 App. Div. 643 ) regarding the domicile of incompetents are not controlling.

Weinrib v. Weisler

27 N.Y.2d 592 · New York Court of Appeals · Jun 3, 1970

Matter of Healey v. Bazinet

291 N.Y. 430 · New York Court of Appeals · Dec 8, 1943

(Matter of Andresen v. Rice, 277 N. Y. 271 .) It was practicable to conduct examinations for positions in the local police force in the city of Glens Falls. … Y. 491, 494 ; Matter of Hilsenrad v. Miller, 284 N. Y. 445 .)

B.E. U. Free S. Dist. v. Greenburgh

278 N.Y. 566 · New York Court of Appeals · May 24, 1938

Hughes v. . County of Monroe

147 N.Y. 49 · New York Court of Appeals · Oct 8, 1895

(Ensign v. Supervisors of livingston County, 25 Hun, 20 ; Alamango v. Supervisors of Albany County, 25 id. 551; Ham v. The Mayor, 70 N. Y. 459 ; Smith v. City *58 of Rochester, 76 id. 506 ; Benton v. … (Curran v. City of Boston, 151 Mass. 505, 510 ; Alamago v. Board of Supervisors of Albany County, 25 Hun, 551 , 552, 553; People ex rel. Society of the New York Hospital v. Purdy, 126 N. Y. 679 , and 58 Hun, 386 .)

Ahern v. . Steele

115 N.Y. 203 · New York Court of Appeals · Oct 7, 1889

Such is the result of the discussion in Brown v. Cayuga & Susquehanna Railroad Company ( 12 N. Y. 486 ), where the action was for overflowing the plaintiff’s land. … (See, also, White v. Board of Health, L. R, 10 Q. B. 219.) The same principle applies here.

Ball v. State of New York

41 N.Y.2d 617 · New York Court of Appeals · Apr 7, 1977

Moreover, the general rule " 'applies with peculiar force to statutes enacted at the same session of the Legislature’ ” (County of Saratoga v Saratoga Harness Racing Assn., 4 NY2d 622, 627 , quoting from Board of Educ. v … Finally, appellant places considerable reliance on our recent decision in Matter of Blyn v Bartlett ( 39 NY2d 349 ), which involved the question whether the Administrative Board of the Judicial Conference could validly abolish

Matter of McGrinder v. Sullivan

290 N.Y. 11 · New York Court of Appeals · Mar 4, 1943

(Matter of Field v. Charmette Knitted Fabric Co., 245 N. Y. 139 .) The negative answer given by the Board was an act of judgment upon a debatable matter of fact. … The Appellate Division was without power to direct the Board to decide the other way as matter of law. (Workmen’s Compensation Law, § 20; Matter of Dubinsky v. Kofsky, 266 N. Y. 631 ; Matter of Daus v.

Margolis v. Larkin

30 N.Y.2d 876 · New York Court of Appeals · Jun 14, 1972

Fasoldt v. Bugbee

13 N.Y.3d 726 · New York Court of Appeals · Aug 26, 2009

OPINION OF THE COURT Order reversed and proceedings dismissed (see Matter of Cass v Krakower, 13 NY3d 118 [2009] [decided today]). Concur: Chief Judge Lippman and Judges Ciparick, Graffeo, Read, Smith, Pigott and Jones.