Case law

Opinions from 1658 to today.

Filtersny

10,000+ results

2.52s

  • Margolis v. Larkin

    30 N.Y.2d 876 · New York Court of Appeals · Jun 14, 1972

    Cited 2 timesPublishedNo opinion text
  • Cherry Hill Homes, Inc. v. Barbiere

    28 N.Y.2d 381 · New York Court of Appeals · May 26, 1971

    The board denied the variance. The court at Special Term annulled this determination on the authority of Matter of Fulling v. … Gorp. v. Zaino, 27 N Y 2d 258).

    Cited 9 timesPublished
  • Fire Dept. of New York v. . Gilmour

    149 N.Y. 453 · New York Court of Appeals · May 26, 1896

    It is manifest that if an irreviewable discretion is-thereby lodged in the board, and the citizen is precluded in a. suit for the penalty from contesting the reasonableness of an order made, the board is vested with a power … Copcutt v. Board of Health, 140 N. Y. 1 ; Health Dept. v. Rector, supra ; City of Salem v. E. R. R. Co., 98 Hass. 431.) For the denial of this" right we think the order should be affirmed. All concur. Order affirmed.

    Cited 32 timesPublished
  • Village of Lynbrook v. Cadoo

    252 N.Y. 308 · New York Court of Appeals · Dec 3, 1929

    (United States v. New York & Porto Rico S. S. Co., 239 U. S. 88, 93 .) Waiver may in such cases be implied from a course of conduct indicative of a disposition to forego a right which might have been insisted upon. … West v. City of Des Moines, 96 Iowa, 521 .) Government is a practical affair. Statutory proceedings by town and village boards are often defective in some unsubstantial detail.

    Cited 26 timesPublished
  • Matter of Hart

    159 N.Y. 278 · New York Court of Appeals · Jun 6, 1899

    Co. v. Jeroloman, 139 N. Y. 14 ; People ex rel. Jacobus v. Van Wyck, 157 id. 495.) … Wren v. Goetting, 133 N. Y. 569 ; People ex rel. Lewis v.

    Cited 18 timesPublished
  • Matter of Harby v. . Marwell Brothers, Inc.

    235 N.Y. 504 · New York Court of Appeals · Jan 23, 1923

    Cited 11 timesPublished
  • Metzger v. Swift

    258 N.Y. 440 · New York Court of Appeals · Mar 3, 1932

    This does not mean that one fulfilling such a function is invariably a State as distinguished from a city officer (Lewis v. Board of Education, 258 N. Y. 117 ; Matter of Hirshfield v. Cook, 227 N. … Bolton v. Albertson, 55 N. Y. 50 ).

    Cited 13 timesPublished
  • Biondi v. Beekman Hill House Apartment Corp.

    94 N.Y.2d 659 · New York Court of Appeals · Apr 11, 2000

    Co. v Village of Hempstead, 48 NY2d 218, 228 ). … Co. v Goldfarb, 53 NY2d 392, 400 , quoting Messersmith v American Fid. Co., 232 NY 161, 165 ).

    Cited 75 timesPublished
  • Matter of Lindgren

    232 N.Y. 59 · New York Court of Appeals · Oct 28, 1921

    of the city of New York and the other for president of the board of aldermen. … Sherwood v. Board of Canvassers ( 129 N.

    Cited 30 timesPublished
  • Van Blerkom v. Donovan

    15 N.Y.2d 399 · New York Court of Appeals · Apr 22, 1965

    S. 881 ) and Matter of Vetere v. Allen (21 A D 2d 561, affd. 15 N Y 2d 259). … We agree with the courts below that here, as in Matter of Balaban v. Rubin (14 N Y 2d 193, supra) and Matter of Vetere v.

    Cited 7 timesPublished
  • E. Meadow Cmty. Concerts Ass'n v. Bd. of Educ. of Union Free Sch. Dist. No. 3, County of Nassau

    19 N.Y.2d 605 · New York Court of Appeals · Jan 19, 1967

    I, § 8; see, e.g., Bond v. Floyd, 385 U. S. 116, 132-135 ; Kunz v. New York, 340 U. S. 290 ; Hague v. C.I.O., 307 U. S. 496 ; Matter of Rockwell v. … Morris, 10 N Y 2d 721, affg. 12 A D 2d 272) and, .since there is here no showing that Seeger’s expression of his views would “ immediately and irreparably create injury to the public weal ” (Matter of Rockwell v.

    Cited 4 timesPublished
  • Matter of Murray v. Teachers' Retirement Bd.

    258 N.Y. 389 · New York Court of Appeals · Feb 9, 1932

    The petitioner’s application for retirement became effective without any action of the defendant Board, if in fact she was entitled to prior service as certified by that Board. (Matter of Creveling v. … (Matter of Langdon v. Teachers’ Retirement Board, 252 N. Y. 508 .) So, too, if the decision is the result of fraud or collusion. (Osterhoudt v. Rigney, 98 N. Y. 222 .)

    Cited 7 timesPublished
  • Matter of Coulter (Croft)

    285 N.Y. 206 · New York Court of Appeals · Mar 13, 1941

    (Lane v. Johnson, 283 N. Y. 244 .) … We did point out in Lane v.

    Cited 2 timesPublished
  • Junius Construction Corp. v. Cohen

    257 N.Y. 393 · New York Court of Appeals · Nov 17, 1931

    Co. v. Priest, 206 N. Y. 274 ; Edwards v. Bruorton, 184 Mass. 529 , and on the other hand, Matter of City of New York, 196 N. Y. 255 ; Matter of Wulfsohn v. Burden, 241 N. Y. 288 ; Village of Euclid v. … S.] 557; Gotthelf v. Stranahan, 138 N. Y. 345, 352 ; Stokes v. Stokes, 155 N. Y. 581, 590 ).

    Cited 71 timesPublished
  • Jerrell v. Ibsen

    91 N.Y.2d 829 · New York Court of Appeals · Nov 20, 1997

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • Bell v. Dagg

    15 N.Y. 528 · New York Court of Appeals · Apr 27, 1875

    (Whitney v. National Bank of Potsdam, 45 N. Y., 305 .) … (Tanner v. Smart, 6 Barn. & Cress., 603, 609.)

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • Hood v. Webster

    271 N.Y. 57 · New York Court of Appeals · Apr 21, 1936

    (Westbrook v. Gleason, 79 N. Y. 23 ; Ten Eyck v. Witbeck, 135 N. Y. 40 ; Lehrenkrauss v. Bonnell, 199 N. Y. 240, 243 .) Brown v. Volkening ( 64 N. Y. 76 ) and Constant v. University of Rochester ( 111 N. Y. 604 ; 133 N. … (Wood v. Chapin, 13 N. Y. 509, 518 ; Page v. Waring, 76 N. Y. 463, 469 ; Lacustrine Fertilizer Co. v. Lake Guano & Fertilizer Co., 82 N. Y. 476, 483 ; Ward v. Isbill, 73 Hun, 550 .) We have a different case here.

    Cited 11 timesPublished
  • Fallica v. Town of Brookhaven

    52 N.Y.2d 794 · New York Court of Appeals · Dec 22, 1980

    Cited 15 timesPublished
  • Matter of Aj Clarke Mgmt. Corp. v. Conciliation & Appeals Bd. of the City of New York

    58 N.Y.2d 1108 · New York Court of Appeals · Mar 31, 1983

    Cited 6 timesPublished
  • Dalton v. Educational Testing Service

    87 N.Y.2d 384 · New York Court of Appeals · Dec 7, 1995

    This is so notwithstanding inconsistent testimony by Board members that the Board did review Dalton’s information but found it unpersuasive. … In an analogous context, we have refused to compel a university to issue a degree to a student who had not fulfilled the academic requirements (see, Matter of Olsson v Board of Higher Educ., 49 NY2d 408 ).

    Cited 466 timesPublished

Ask Donna

Ask Donna

A word about cookies

We need a few to keep you signed in and the library working. The rest help us see which pages people use and where they get stuck. They stay off unless you say yes.