Case law

MATTER OF JEWISH RECONSTRUCTIONIST SYNAGOGUE OF THE N. SHORE, INC. v. Levitan

34 N.Y.2d 827 · New York Court of Appeals · Jun 12, 1974

down by the Village Board (cf. … Matter of Texas Co. v. Sinclair , 304 N.Y. 817 , affg. 279 App. Div. 803 ; Matter of Plotinsky v. Gardner , 15 A D 2d 563; Matter of Lynch v. Gardner , 15 A D 2d 562; Matter of Board of Educ. v. Wolf , 10 A D 2d 713).

In re the Claim of Guimarales

68 N.Y.2d 989 · New York Court of Appeals · Nov 25, 1986

Whether collateral estoppel applies is, however, a question of law turning on the identity of the issues involved and whether there was a full and fair opportunity to litigate the issue in the prior proceeding (Ryan v New … The Appellate Division’s review of the Appeal Board’s decision on that question after remittitur would then be limited to *992 whether the Board’s conclusion as to "misconduct”, a mixed question of law and fact, had a "rational

Matter of Marin v. Bd. of Elections of the State of New York

67 N.Y.2d 634 · New York Court of Appeals · Jan 16, 1986

Board of Elections, 65 NY2d 949 ; Matter of Greenspan v O’Rourke, 27 NY2d 846 ; Matter of Suthergreen v Westall, 6 AD2d 1014 ; see, Liberal Party of State of N. … Y. v Board of Elections, 65 NY2d 949 ). Concur: Chief Judge Wachtler and Judges Meyer, Simons, Kaye, Alexander, Titone and Hancock, Jr.

Browne v. Hibbets

290 N.Y. 459 · New York Court of Appeals · Apr 15, 1943

Deverell v. Musical Mutual Protective Union, supra.) … (Polin v. Kaplan, 257 N. Y. 277, 281 .)

Folts v. . State of New York

118 N.Y. 406 · New York Court of Appeals · Jan 31, 1890

(Reed v. The State of N. Y., 108 N. Y. 407 .) … (Colrick v. Swinburne, 8 N. Y. S. R. 173, opinion by Judge Andrews; Uline v. N. Y. C. & H. R. R. R. 101, N. Y. 98.)

Brous v. Smith

304 N.Y. 164 · New York Court of Appeals · May 29, 1952

board, if empowered by the town board in accordance with standards and specifications approved by the town board, as *168 adequate in respect to the public health, safety and general welfare for the special circumstances … (See Allen v. Stockwell, 210 Mich. 488 ; Ayres v. City Council of Los Angeles, 34 Cal. 2d 31, 42 ; cf. Newton v. American Sec. Co., 201 Ark. 943 ; Ridgefield Land Co. v. City of Detroit, 241 Mich. 468 .)

Claim of Carpenter v. Sibley, Lindsay & Curr Co.

302 N.Y. 304 · New York Court of Appeals · Mar 9, 1951

Matter of Altschuller v. Bressler, 289 N. Y. 463 ; 7 Wigmore on Evidence [3d ed.], § 1976). … See Williams v. Dela *307 ware, L. & W. R. R. Co., 155 N. Y. 158,162-163 ; Cannon v. Fargo, 222 N. Y. 321, 325 ; Loewinthan v. Le Vine, 299 N. Y. 372, 377-378 .)

Cassidy v. . Uhlmann

170 N.Y. 505 · New York Court of Appeals · Apr 8, 1902

Bank of Deposit v. Rogers, 166 N. Y. 380 ; Castleman v. Mayer, 168 N. Y. 354 ; Townsend v. Bell, 167 N. Y. 462 .) … (Cragie v. Hadley, 99 N. Y. 133 ; Commercial Bank v. Hughes, 17 wend. 94; Met. Nat. Bank v. Loyd, 90 N. Y. 530 ; Ætna Nat. Bank v. Fourth Nat. Bank, 46 N. Y. 86 ; Crawford v. West Side Bank, 100 N. Y. 53 ; Fowler v.

Wintersteen v. . City of New York

220 N.Y. 57 · New York Court of Appeals · Jan 9, 1917

The appellant urges that the resolution fixing the compensation of architectural draftsman in Smith v. Board of Education, N. Y. ( 208 N. Y. 84 ) and in Pitt v. Board of Education, N. Y. ( 216 N. … Stokes v. Tully ( 108 App.

Civil Service Employees Ass'n v. Helsby

21 N.Y.2d 541 · New York Court of Appeals · Mar 7, 1968

In this article 78 (CPLR) proceeding brought by the Association against the Board and various employee organizations petitioning the Board with respect to representation status, Special Term sustained the Board and dismissed … under sections 205 and 207 to obtain Board certification.

Morris v. . Windsor Trust Co.

213 N.Y. 27 · New York Court of Appeals · Nov 10, 1914

(Sawyer v. Hoag, 17 Wall. 610, 622 ; Libby v. Hopkins, 104 U. S. 303 ; Western Tie & Timber Co. v. Brown, 196 U. S. 502, 509 .) I think the set-off is without sanction, either statutory or equitable. … Hopkins , in Western Tile & Timber Co. v. Brown , and in Hanover Nat. Bank *33 v. Suddath (supra), was not a technical or special one.

Bottom v. Travis

2 N.Y. 822 · New York Court of Appeals · Jun 10, 2004

People v. Cona

49 N.Y.2d 26 · New York Court of Appeals · Dec 13, 1979

48 NY2d 1 , with People v Robinson, 36 NY2d 224 ). … Johnson, 47 NY2d 124 ; People v Williams, 31 NY2d 151 ).

People Ex Rel. Nicholl v. New York Infant Asylum

122 N.Y. 190 · New York Court of Appeals · Oct 7, 1890

Mott v. Board Suprs. Green Co., 64 N. Y. 600 .) … (Goddard v. Stiles, 99 N. Y. 640 ; People ex rel. Lunney v. Campbell, 12 id. 496.)

Jackson v. Citizens Casualty Co.

277 N.Y. 385 · New York Court of Appeals · Apr 12, 1938

Lord, as operator, and Brown & Kleinhenz, Inc., and Forbes Motor Agency, Inc., as owners. … Co. v. Smart, 267 U. S. 126 , affg. 236 N. Y. 577 ; 206 App. Div. 630 .)

Parmenter v. . State

135 N.Y. 154 · New York Court of Appeals · Oct 4, 1892

In Sohn v. … In Pereles v.

Citroen Cars Corp. v. City of New York

30 N.Y.2d 300 · New York Court of Appeals · May 3, 1972

I, § 10, cl. 2; Brown v. Maryland, 12 Wheat. [25 U. S.] 419). The issue is whether the importer had so altered its automobiles as to forfeit their immunity. … The breadth of the tax immunity was first propounded in Chief Justice Marshall’s celebrated opinion in Brown v. Maryland (12 Wheat. [25 U. S.] 419, supra).

Claim of Stimburis v. Leviton Mfg. Co.

5 N.Y.2d 360 · New York Court of Appeals · Mar 12, 1959

Matter of Roder v. Northern Maytag Co. ( 297 N. Y. 196 ) points the way for reversal here. In Boder the claim was disallowed on the ground that claimant had failed to establish causal connection. … Matter of Roder v. Northern Maytag Co. ( 297 N. Y. 196 , supra) clearly holds that when application for reopening is made within the seven years the board, after seven years, may reconsider its denial.

Betancourt v. Strohm

75 N.Y.2d 873 · New York Court of Appeals · Mar 19, 1990

Fasoldt v. Bugbee

13 N.Y.3d 726 · New York Court of Appeals · Aug 26, 2009

OPINION OF THE COURT Order reversed and proceedings dismissed (see Matter of Cass v Krakower, 13 NY3d 118 [2009] [decided today]). Concur: Chief Judge Lippman and Judges Ciparick, Graffeo, Read, Smith, Pigott and Jones.