Case law

People Ex Rel. Desiderio v. . Conolly

238 N.Y. 326 · New York Court of Appeals · Jun 3, 1924

Corwin v. Walter, 68 N. Y. 403 ; People ex rel. Second Ave. R. R. Co. v. Board of Commrs., 97 N. Y. 37 ; People ex rel. Schau v. McWilliams, 185 N. Y. 92 ; People ex rel. Finnegan v. McBride, 226 N. Y. 252 ). … Satterlee v. Board of Police, 75 N. Y. 38, 43 ; Swift v. Mayor, etc., of N. Y., 83 N. Y. 528, 535 ; Matter of Freel, 148 N. Y. 165 ; Davidson v. Village of White Plains, 197 N. Y. 266 ).

People v. Gavazzi

20 N.Y.3d 907 · New York Court of Appeals · Nov 27, 2012

The standard for adherence with the statutory requirement is “substantial—rather than literal— compliance” (People v Taylor, 73 NY2d 683, 688 [1989]; see People v Brown, 40 NY2d 183, 186 [1976]). … People v Smythe, 172 AD2d 1028 [4th Dept 1991]; People v Pizzuto, 101 AD2d 1024, 1024-1025 [4th Dept 1984]).

Schwartz v. Lee

22 N.Y.2d 743 · New York Court of Appeals · Jun 6, 1968

People Ex Rel. Cecere v. Jennings

250 N.Y. 239 · New York Court of Appeals · Feb 13, 1929

The sentence was still an indeterminate one, subject to the action of the Board of Parole for State Prisons, the only change being a reduction of the minimum (People ex rel. Atkins v. Jennings, 248 N. Y. 46, 49, 50 ). … Newton v. Twombly, 228 N. Y. 33 ). He failed to comply with the conditions upon which this privilege depended.

People McDonough v. Bd. of Managers, Buffalo St. Asylum

96 N.Y. 640 · New York Court of Appeals · Jun 10, 1884

MATTER OF PERLBINDER v. New York City Conciliation & Appeals Bd.

67 N.Y.2d 697 · New York Court of Appeals · Feb 6, 1986

The order of the Appellate Division should be reversed, with costs, and the determination of the Conciliation and Appeals Board (CAB) reinstated. … Corp v New York City Conciliation & Appeals Bd., supra; Matter of Cale Dev. Co. v Conciliation & Appeals Bd., 61 NY2d 976 , affg 94 AD2d 229 ; Hivee Realty Corp.

Thomas v. New York & Greenwood Lake Railway Co.

139 N.Y. 163 · New York Court of Appeals · Oct 3, 1893

This court, in Boardman v. Lake Shore & Mich. S. Railway Co. ( 84 N. … The case of Uhlman v. New York Life Ins. Co. ( 109 N.

Matter of Ross v. Laguardia

287 N.Y. 28 · New York Court of Appeals · Nov 27, 1941

Matter of Beggs v. Kern, 284 N. … From the foregoing it must follow that if the Board of Estimate so chooses, in the absence of special legislation, it is for the Board to determine whether or not to dispense with a given service or whether or not and on

Taylor v. Mayor of New York

67 N.Y. 87 · New York Court of Appeals · Oct 3, 1876

We have recently decided in the case of Whitmore v. … In the recent case of Taylor v.

MATTER OF WOLKOFF v. Chassin

89 N.Y.2d 250 · New York Court of Appeals · Nov 14, 1996

Where, however, a statute conferred power to act on several persons, all were required to be present before the statutory power could be exercised (Matter of Town of Smithtown v Howell, 31 NY2d 365, 376 ; Morris v Cashmore … , 31 NY2d at 377 , supra; accord, Morris v Cashmore, 253 App Div at 661 , supra).

People Ex Rel. Republican & Journal Co. v. Wiggins

199 N.Y. 382 · New York Court of Appeals · Oct 25, 1910

Trustees of Jamaica v. Board of Supervisors Queens Co., 131 N. Y. 468 .) … Steward v. Board of R. R. Commissioners ( 160 N.

People v. Kuhn

33 N.Y.2d 203 · New York Court of Appeals · Dec 27, 1973

(Davis v. United States, 328 U. S. 582 ; Zap v. United States, 328 U. S. 624 .) … (Chimel v. California, 395 U. S. 752; People v. Sullivan, 29 N Y 2d 69; People v. Gallmon, 19 N Y 2d 389.) The orders appealed from should be affirmed. Chief Judge Fuld and Judges.

Friends of Shawangunks, Inc. v. Knowlton

64 N.Y.2d 387 · New York Court of Appeals · Mar 19, 1985

Corp. v Burns, 14 Misc 2d 1037 ; Matter of Forte v Wolf, 225 NYS2d 858 ; cf. Matter of Isenbarth v Bartnett, 206 App Div 546 , affd 237 NY 617 ). … Planning Bd., 59 NY2d 385, 392; People v Graham, 55 NY2d 144, 152), but also the fact that subdivision (b) of that section makes the number of permitted dwelling units a matter of “the planning board’s judgment,” which may

Carney v. New York Life Insurance

162 N.Y. 453 · New York Court of Appeals · Apr 17, 1900

of Beers v. … (Wright v. Bank of the Metropolis, 110 N. Y. 237 , 249 ; Mead v. Parker, 111 N. Y. 259, 262 ; Sullivan v. N. Y. & Rosendale Cement Co., 119 N. Y. 348 , 355 ; Colt v. Owens, 90 N. Y. 368 .)

Claim of Orpin v. D. P. Bros. & Co.

12 N.Y.2d 749 · New York Court of Appeals · Oct 25, 1962

Andersen v. Meisser

10 N.Y.2d 798 · New York Court of Appeals · Sep 2, 1961

Matter of Sherman v. Bd. of Regents of the Univ. of the State of New York

19 N.Y.2d 679 · New York Court of Appeals · Feb 21, 1967

Carr v. Hoy

2 N.Y.2d 185 · New York Court of Appeals · Jan 10, 1957

That public policy is the one described in Riggs v. Palmer ( 115 N. … But we affirm rather than dismiss the appeal (see Matter of MacDonald v. Browne, 294 N. Y. 263 ; Matter of Madison Ave. Offices v. Browne, 294 N.

National Fire Insurance v. Hughes

189 N.Y. 84 · New York Court of Appeals · Jun 4, 1907

In Brown v. Gallaudet ( 80 N. … (See Tyler v. Standard Wine Co., supra; Inslee v. Hampton, 8 Hun, 230 .) .In McGrath v. Maxwell ( 17 App.

People Ex Rel. Crane v. . Hahlo

228 N.Y. 309 · New York Court of Appeals · Apr 13, 1920

(Railroad Co. v. Grant, 98 U. S. 398 ; Smith v. District Court, etc., 4 Colo. 235 ; Grover v. Coon, 1 N. Y. 536 ; People v. Dunn, 31 App. Div. 139 ; Croveno v. Atlantic Ave. R. R. Co., 150 N. Y. 225 .) … Swift v. Luce (supra).