Case law

Opinions from 1658 to today.

Filtersny

10,000+ results

1.57s

  • In re the Claim of Fisher

    36 N.Y.2d 146 · New York Court of Appeals · Feb 27, 1975

    Standard Dredging Corp. v. Murphy, 319 U. S. 306 .) … (See, e.g., Matter of Colton v. Berman, 21 N Y 2d 322, 334.) Questions of law, of course, may always be reviewed by an appellate court. (Matter of Van Teslaar [Levine], 35 N Y 2d 311, 317-318.)

    Cited 87 timesPublished
  • Jarecki v. Shung Moo Louie

    95 N.Y.2d 665 · New York Court of Appeals · Feb 15, 2001

    v Ickovic, 79 AD2d 603 , affd 55 NY2d 727 ). … Pergola Props., 88 NY2d 466, 479 ; see also, Buffalo Seminary v McCarthy, 86 AD2d 435 , affd for reasons stated 58 NY2d 867 ).

    Cited 44 timesPublished
  • Matter of Ralph v. Bd. of Estimate of City of Ny

    306 N.Y. 447 · New York Court of Appeals · Apr 8, 1954

    Matter of Oram v. Moon Co., 285 N. Y. 42, 46 ; Matter of Gibbs v. Macy & Co., 214 App. Div. 335, 336-337 , affd. 242 N. Y. 551 .) … That requires ‘ such relevant evidence as a reasonable mind might accept as adequate to support a conclusion. ’ (Consolidated Edison Co. v. National Labor Relations Board, 305 U.

    Cited 6 timesPublished
  • Bonacorsa v. Van Lindt

    71 N.Y.2d 605 · New York Court of Appeals · May 3, 1988

    Gerry v United States 423 US 1032 ). … Horse racing is the only sport in this State in which betting is legal and, therefore, has traditionally been heavily regulated (see, Matter of Casse v New York State Racing & Wagering Bd., 70 NY2d 589, 596 ; Barry v Barchi

    Cited 49 timesPublished
  • Claim of Durdaller v. Liberty Products Corp.

    12 N.Y.2d 787 · New York Court of Appeals · Nov 1, 1962

    Cited 4 timesPublished
  • Rosenberger v. Redman

    22 N.Y.2d 815 · New York Court of Appeals · Jun 14, 1968

    Cited 1 timesPublished
  • Rocky Point Drive-In, L.P. v. Town of Brookhaven

    21 N.Y.3d 729 · New York Court of Appeals · Nov 14, 2013

    The Board announced a date for a public meeting to be held on the issue. … Co. v Board of Stds. & Appeals of City of N.Y. in support of its argument. In Faymor the applicant would have had, in the absence of municipal wrongdoing, a vested right ( 45 NY2d 560, 566 [1978]).

    Cited 20 timesPublished
  • De Masi v. D'Apice

    60 N.Y.2d 817 · New York Court of Appeals · Oct 28, 1983

    Cited 3 timesPublished
  • Honeoye Falls-Lima Central School District v. Honeoye Falls-Lima Education Ass'n

    49 N.Y.2d 732 · New York Court of Appeals · Feb 5, 1980

    Port Washington Teachers Assn., 45 NY2d 411 ; Matter of Board of Educ. v United Federation of Teachers, 46 NY2d 1018 ). … Matter of Feinerman v Board of Coop.

    Cited 31 timesPublished
  • MATTER OF CROSSROADS RECREATION v. Broz

    4 N.Y.2d 39 · New York Court of Appeals · Feb 28, 1958

    Werner v. Walsh, 212 App. Div. 635, 640 , affd. 240 N. Y. 689 ; Franklin v. Incorporated Vil. of Floral Park, 269 App. Div. 695, 696 , affd. 294 N. Y. 862 ; Matter of Reed v. Board of Standards & Appeals, 255 N. … Y. 126, 134 ; Matter of Stillman v. Board of Standards & Appeals, 222 App. Div. 19, 20 , affd. 247 N. Y. 599 ; Matter of Falvo v. Kerner, 222 App. Div. 289, 291 .)

    Cited 56 timesPublished
  • Matter of Fugazy v. Kern

    280 N.Y. 375 · New York Court of Appeals · May 23, 1939

    The Municipal Civil Service Commission, the Budget Director and the Board of Elections were made defendants. The Board asked that the petition be granted. … Plancon v. Prendergast ( 219 N. Y. 252 ) and Matter of Dobrovolny v. Prendergast ( 219 N. Y. 280 ) are not in point. The positions there involved were subject to regulation by the Board of Aldermen. In Matter of Daly v.

    Cited 3 timesPublished
  • Wallace v. . Walsh

    125 N.Y. 26 · New York Court of Appeals · Dec 2, 1890

    Quarry Co. v. Bliss, 27 N. Y. 297 ; Garrison v. Howe, 17 id. 465.) … The several English cases of Rex v. Varlo (1 Cowp. 248); Rex v. Bellringer (4 Durn. & East, 810); Rex v. Miller (6 id. 268); Bailiff, etc., v.

    Cited 13 timesPublished
  • Claim of Harrison v. N. Y. C. Housing Authority

    32 N.Y.2d 754 · New York Court of Appeals · Apr 26, 1973

    Cited 1 timesPublished
  • Hottinger v. Coveney

    34 N.Y.2d 890 · New York Court of Appeals · Jun 27, 1974

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • Carr v. Antonoff

    33 N.Y.2d 868 · New York Court of Appeals · Dec 27, 1973

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • In Re the Accounting of Gruner

    295 N.Y. 510 · New York Court of Appeals · Jul 23, 1946

    Loveland, 68 Cal. 254 [where the rules of the San Francisco Stock and Exchange Board were more liberal]; Nashua Savings Bank v. … (Brown on Personal Property [1936], § 107.)

    Cited 35 timesPublished
  • Goldin v. Greenberg

    49 N.Y.2d 566 · New York Court of Appeals · Apr 1, 1980

    The board of education of the city is an "agency” of the city (New York City Charter, § 1150, subd 2; Matter of Maloff v City Comm. on Human Rights, 38 NY2d 329, 332 ). … v Cook, 227 NY 297, 304 ; see Matter of Maloff v City Comm. on Human Rights, supra; Matter of Board of Educ. v Goldin, 94 Misc 2d 574, 581 , affd 72 AD2d 603 ).

    Cited 16 timesPublished
  • In re the Buffalo Mutual Gas Light Co.

    144 N.Y. 228 · New York Court of Appeals · Dec 18, 1894

    The order was not made until after the board had completed its business and finally adjourned. … (People ex rel. v. Supervisors of Ulster Co., 65 N. Y. 300 ; Matter of Hermance, 71 id. 484; Matter of the Catholic Protectory, 77 id. 342; Williams v. Supervisors of Wayne Co., 78 id. 561.)

    Cited 12 timesPublished
  • Connelly v. . O'Brien

    166 N.Y. 406 · New York Court of Appeals · Apr 16, 1901

    (Moore v. Lyons, 25 Wend. 119 ; Sage v. Wheeler, 3 App. Div. 38 ; Matter of Brown, 93 N. Y. 295 ; Delafield v. Shipman, 103 N. Y. 463 ; Stokes v. Weston, 142 N. Y. 433 ; Bisson v. West Shore R. R. Co., 143 N. … Y. 125 ; Corse v. Chapman, 153 N. Y. 466 ; Hersee v. Simpson, 154 N. Y. 496 ; Goodwin v. Coddington, 154 N. Y. 283 ; Matter of Brown, 154 N. Y. 313 .)

    Cited 141 timesPublished
  • Shulman v. Hunderfund

    12 N.Y.3d 143 · New York Court of Appeals · Mar 26, 2009

    Actual malice must be proved by “clear and convincing evidence” (Bose Corp. v Consumers Union of United States, Inc., 466 US 485 , 511 n 30 [1984]; see also Freeman v Johnston, 84 NY2d 52, 56-57 [1994]). … The usual deference paid by courts to jury verdicts is inapplicable in cases subject to the New York Times Co. v Sullivan rule.

    Cited 9 timesPublished

Ask Donna

Ask Donna

A word about cookies

We need a few to keep you signed in and the library working. The rest help us see which pages people use and where they get stuck. They stay off unless you say yes.