Case law
Opinions from 1658 to today.
10,000+ results
3.90s
298 N.Y. 235 · New York Court of Appeals · Oct 14, 1948
V, § 6). In Matter of Fink v. Finegan ( 270 N. … Board of Examiners, 274 N. Y. 367 ; Matter of Cowen v. Reavy, 283 N. Y. 232 ). In the light of the constitutional principle so declared, we turn to the matters upon which our decision is sought.
Cited 8 timesPublished41 N.Y. 36 · New York Court of Appeals · Dec 16, 1976
(Taylor v Louisiana, 419 US, at p 528 ; Brown v Allen, 344 US 443, 474 .) … (Matter of Brown v Ristich, supra; People v Rensing, 14 NY2d 210, 213 .)
Cited 0 timesPublishedPeople Ex Rel. Lester v. . Eno
176 N.Y. 513 · New York Court of Appeals · Nov 24, 1903
Sims v. Bd. Fire Commrs., 73 N. Y. 437 .) … Gambling v. Cholwell, 6 Abb. Pr. 151 ; Plymouthv. County Commrs., 16 Gray, 341 ; People ex rel. Toohey v. Webb, 50 N. Y. St. Rep. 46.) The provisions of section 2134 (Code Civ.
Cited 11 timesPublishedTallman v. Atlantic Fire & Marine Insurance
4 Abb. Ct. App. 345 · New York Court of Appeals · Dec 15, 1866
The arrangement between Brown and that firm seems to have been well understood by Chapin, the defendants’ agent. … Burt v. Dutcher, 34 N. Y. 493 . We said, in the case of Bidwell v. Northwestern Ins.
Cited 0 timesPublishedFarbman v. NYC HEALTH & HOSPS.
62 N.Y.2d 75 · New York Court of Appeals · May 10, 1984
Brown and Michael Gage of counsel), for respondents. Chief Judge COOKE and Judges JASEN, JONES, WACHTLER, MEYER and SIMONS concur. *78 KAYE, J. … Whalen , 54 N.Y.2d 89, 96-98 ; Matter of Short v Board of Managers of Nassau County Med.
Cited 1 timesPublishedBriarcliff Lodge Hotel, Inc. v. Citizen-Sentinel Publishers, Inc.
260 N.Y. 106 · New York Court of Appeals · Nov 22, 1932
“ That is a thing that isn’t troubling the Municipal Board of Briarcliff at all. In fact, members of the Board aren’t interested in what the Lodge will do. … (Hoeppner v. Dunkirk Printing Co., 254 N. Y. 95 .)
Cited 77 timesPublished31 N.Y. 490 · New York Court of Appeals · Mar 5, 1865
The law on this subject is well settled. “ The proof,” says Brown, J., in Cobb v, Dows ( 9 Barb., 242 ), “need not show a tortious taking, or that the defendants acted in bad faith. … (Perkins v. Smith 1 Wils., 328; Everett v. Coffin, 6 Wend., 603 ; Williams v. Merle, 11 id., 80; Saltus v. Everett , 20, id., 267; Hoffman, v. Cason, 22 id., 285; Covell v. Hill, 4 Denio, 323 ; Allen v.
Cited 76 timesPublishedMatter of Martirano v. Zoning Bd. of Appeals of the Town of Lewisboro
57 N.Y.2d 867 · New York Court of Appeals · Oct 14, 1982
Cited 6 timesPublishedClaim of Schechter v. State Insurance Fund
6 N.Y.2d 506 · New York Court of Appeals · Jul 8, 1959
See Williams v. Delaware, L. & W. R. R. Co., 155 N.Y. 158, 162-163 ; Cannon v. Fargo, 222 N.Y. 321, 325 ; Loewinthan v. Le Vine, 299 N. … That being so, it follows that the decision of the board must be sustained (Matter of Kopec v. Buffalo Brake Beam-Acme Steel & Malleable Iron Works, 304 N.Y. 65, 71 , supra; Workmen’s Compensation Law, § 20).
Cited 18 timesPublished64 N.Y. 18 · New York Court of Appeals · Jan 25, 1876
They organize not as a board of supervisors or assessors, but as a distinct board for a special service. … (People v. Palmer, 52 N. Y., 83 ; In re The Evergreens, 47 id., 216 ; Mongeon v. The People, 55 id., 613.)
Cited 18 timesPublished241 N.Y. 49 · New York Court of Appeals · Jul 15, 1925
Voorhis that some time prior to April 1st, 1922, various voting machines had been approved by the State Board of Voting Machine Commissioners and were before the Board of Elections for consideration. … (Pond v. Negus, 3 Mass. 230 ; People v. Allen, 6 Wend. 486 ; People v. Cook, 14 Barb. 259 ; Looney v. Hughes, 26 N. Y. 514 ; Matter of Clark, 168 N. Y. 427 .)
Cited 9 timesPublishedPeople Ex Rel. N.Y.C., Etc., Co. v. . P.S. Com.
195 N.Y. 157 · New York Court of Appeals · Apr 6, 1909
Steward v. R.R. Comrs., 160 N.Y. 202 ; People ex rel. Bath H.R.R. Co . v. Pub. Serv. Commission, 127 App. Div. 480 ; affd., 194 N.Y. 543 .) … It is also insisted by the appellant that the relator was not a party aggrieved by the action of the board of railroad commissioners. That was a question for the board and the Appellate Division to consider.
Cited 11 timesPublishedRhodes Preparatory School v. Kelley
296 N.Y. 951 · New York Court of Appeals · Apr 11, 1947
Cited 1 timesPublished267 N.Y. 133 · New York Court of Appeals · Apr 16, 1935
The statute created the State Alcoholic Beverage Control Board (Ch. 180, art. … III, § 1; Penal Law, § 22; Matter of Mandel v. Board of Regents, 250 N. Y. 173, 176 . See the authorities collated in 3 Willoughby on the Constitutional Law of the United States [2d ed.], § 1085, and in 35 Harv. L.
Cited 19 timesPublishedClaim of Coe v. House Inside, Ltd.
29 N.Y.2d 241 · New York Court of Appeals · Nov 17, 1971
She would normally be deemed aggrieved by the refusal of the board to keep the issue of relationship open. (See Ross v. *245 Wigg, 100 N. … For a consistent decision in the Appellate Division as to standing, see Matter of Pierce v.
Cited 7 timesPublishedClaim of Kiriloff v. A. G. W. Wet Wash Laundry, Inc.
282 N.Y. 466 · New York Court of Appeals · Apr 16, 1940
More than “ purely ministerial ” action is now necessary by the Industrial Board. (Matter of Vleck v. Parry, 270 N. Y. 371 ; Cohen on Powers of New York Court of Appeals, § 4, pp. 17, 18; Matter of New York State Elec. … Corp. v. Public Service Comm., 260 N. Y. 32 ; Matter of Grade Crossings [N. Y. C. R. R. Co.], 255 N. Y. 320 .)
Cited 4 timesPublished112 N.Y. 30 · New York Court of Appeals · Jan 15, 1889
(Cumming v. Mayor, etc., of Brooklyn, 11 Paige, 596; Sage v. City of Brooklyn, 89 N. Y. 189 ; McCormack v. City of Brooklyn , 108 id. 49.) … That case involved the question of the authority of the board for the revision and correction of assessment lists in the city of Hew York under a provision in the statute, reading as follows: “ Said board shall have power
Cited 48 timesPublishedMatter of Taylor v. Rochester City School District
17 N.Y.3d 894 · New York Court of Appeals · Oct 20, 2011
Cited 1 timesPublished
Ask Donna