Case law

Claim of Kelly v. New York City Transit Authority

33 N.Y.2d 373 · New York Court of Appeals · Feb 20, 1974

(Matter of Guggenheim v. Hedke & Co., 32 A D 2d 1017, affd. 27 N Y 2d 596.) As to admissibility, the first sentence removes what would otherwise be the categorical bar of the hearsay rule as to all testimony. … The Appellate Division properly reversed the decision of the Workmen’s Compensation Board disallowing the claim a- d, accordingly, the final determination of the board appealed fr m, made upon remission by the Appellate Division

Maleeny v. . Standard Shipbuilding Corp.

237 N.Y. 250 · New York Court of Appeals · Dec 27, 1923

Referring to the case of Steamboat Company v. Chase ( 16 Wall. 522 ) Mr. Justice Brown in Knapp, Stout & Co. v. McCaffrey ( 177 U. … The cases of Johnson & Co. v. Johansen (86 Fed. Rep. 886); The Lackawanna (151 Fed. Rep. 499); Carter v. Brown (212 Fed. Rep. 393), were actions in admiralty.

MATTER OF CIVIL SERV. ASSN. v. Helsby

21 N.Y.2d 541 · New York Court of Appeals · Mar 7, 1968

(See, e.g., Labor Bd. v. Seven-Up Co. , 344 U. S. 344, 346 ; *551 Phelps Dodge Corp. v. Labor Bd. , 313 U. S. 177, 194 .) The Supreme Court's statement in Phelps Dodge Corp v. Labor Bd. ( 313 U. … B. v. Tower Iron Works , 366 F.2d 189 ; Iowa Beef Packers v. N. L. R. B. , 331 F.2d 176 .)

Matter of Gonzalez v. Northeast Parent & Child Socy.

2026 NY Slip Op 01443 · New York Court of Appeals · Mar 17, 2026

v South Colonie Ind. … Colon v Martin , 35 NY3d 75, 80 [2020]; Alifieris v American Airlines , 63 NY2d 370, 376 [1984]; People v Suber , 19 NY3d 247, 253 [2012]).

Matter of Bd. of Educ. of the Roosevelt Union Free Sch. Dist. v. Roosevelt Teachers Ass'n

47 N.Y.2d 748 · New York Court of Appeals · Apr 26, 1979

The board’s failure to advance a Serious argument under the Taylor Law (Civil Service Law, art 14) and the grant to the arbitrator of the "authority to decide whether the provisions of this Agreement have been complied with … School Dist. v Longo, 43 NY2d 136 ; see, also, Board of Educ. v New Paltz United Teachers, 44 NY2d 890 ). Chief Judge Cooke and Judges Jasen, Gabrielli, Jones, Wachtler and Fuchsberg concur.

People v. Bolling

79 N.Y.2d 317 · New York Court of Appeals · Apr 3, 1992

— Rethinking Sixth Amendment Doctrine, Images, and Procedures, 64 NC L Rev 501, 560-561 *330 [1986]; Brown, McGuire and Winters, The Peremptory Challenge as a Manipulative Device in Criminal Trials: Traditional Use or Abuse … Kraemer, 334 US 1 , and Brown v Board of Educ., 349 US 294 ).

People v. Blanchard

288 N.Y. 145 · New York Court of Appeals · Apr 30, 1942

(Metropolitan Board of Health v. Heister, 37 N. Y. 661, 670 ; Polinsky v. People, 73 N. Y. 65 .) … (Matter of Mandel v. Board of Regents, 250 N. Y. 173, 176 .) So, the Legislature has declared that no act or omission is a crime except as prescribed by statute. (Penal Law, § 22; People v. Knapp, 206 N. Y. 373, 380 .)

Burckle v. . Eckhart

3 N.Y. 132 · New York Court of Appeals · Dec 5, 1849

(Brown v. Brown, 1 Barb. Ch. Pr. 215, 216; 8 Paige, 443 .) … (Bents v. Graves, 3 McCord’s R. 280; Overstreet v. Brown , 4 id. 80.)

Peck v. Minot

3 Abb. Ct. App. 465 · New York Court of Appeals · Dec 15, 1867

Brown, is a simple question of fact. … Townsend v. Empire Stone Dressing Co., 6 Duer, 208 ; Stoddard v. Hart, 23 N. Y. 556 ; James v. Morey, 2 Cow. 246, 292 .

People Ex Rel. Carter v. . Rice

135 N.Y. 473 · New York Court of Appeals · Oct 13, 1892

The language of Judge Deoto, in Lanning v. Carpenter ( 20 N. … (Brown v. Clark, 77 N. Y. 369 .)

ITRI BRICK CORP v. Aetna Cas.

89 N.Y.2d 786 · New York Court of Appeals · May 13, 1997

These appeals pose a question left unanswered in Brown v Two Exch. … South Bronx Community Corp. , 78 N.Y.2d 433 ; Brown v Two Exch.

Sprague v. . City of Rochester

159 N.Y. 20 · New York Court of Appeals · Apr 18, 1899

Satterlee v. Board of Police, 15 N. Y. 38, 41 .) If a complaint was made to a member of the board that a sidewalk was out of repair he simply telephoned to the foreman to look after it. … (McNally v. City of Cohoes, 127 N. Y. 350 , 353 ; Smith v. City of Rochester, 79 Hun, 174 ; 150 N. Y. 581 .)

Claim of Gordon v. Temple Beth El of Great Neck

14 N.Y.2d 742 · New York Court of Appeals · May 7, 1964

Claim of Lobman v. Bernhard Altmann Corp.

15 N.Y.2d 506 · New York Court of Appeals · Oct 15, 1964

Judges Fuld and Van Voorhis dissent and vote to reverse and to dismiss the claim upon the ground that there is no substantial evidence to support the determination of the board. Taking no part: Judge Bergan.

People Willson v. Bd. of Trustees, Mount Vernon

128 N.Y. 657 · New York Court of Appeals · Oct 20, 1891

People Ex Rel. St. Albans-Springfield Corp. v. Connell

257 N.Y. 73 · New York Court of Appeals · Jul 15, 1931

Practice followed in Anderson v. Jester ( 206 Iowa, 452 ); Sundlun v. Zoning Board of Pawtucket (50 R. I. 108); McCabe v. Zoning Board of Providence (50 R I. 449). … (Zahn v. Board of Public Works, 195 Cal. 497 ; Sundlun v. Zoning Board of Pawtucket, 50 R. I. 108.)

Bradley v. . Bradley

165 N.Y. 183 · New York Court of Appeals · Dec 11, 1900

(Murray v. Hay, 1 Barb. Ch. 59 ; Wood v. Perry, 1 Barb. 114 ; Foot v. Bronson, 4 Lans. 47 ; Emery v. Erskine, 66 Barb. 9 ; Brinkerhoff v. Brown, 6 Johns. Ch. 139 ; Strobel v. Kerr Salt Co., 164 N. Y. 303 ; Smith v. … Schulting, 14 Hun, 52 ; Kennedy v. City of Troy, ib. 308 ; Kellogg v. Siple, 11 App. Div. 458 ; Simar v. Canaday 53 N. Y. 298 ; Shields v. Barrow, 17 How. [U. S.] 130 ; Williams v. Bankhead, 19 Wall. 563 ; Brown v.

People v. Foster

85 N.Y.2d 1012 · New York Court of Appeals · Jun 13, 1995

Upon seeing the officer, the individual wearing the brown jacket fled across Thirty-third Street toward Fifth Avenue, discarding the jacket as he ran, and disappeared. … , People v Benjamin, 51 NY2d 267, 270 ).

Duffy v. Holt-Harris

89 N.Y.2d 962 · New York Court of Appeals · Feb 11, 1997

Delaware, Lackawanna & Western Railroad v. Slocum

299 N.Y. 496 · New York Court of Appeals · Jul 19, 1949

Moreover, the Supreme Court of the United States has held in Moore v. Illinois Central R. R. Co. ( 312 U. S. 630 ) that the jurisdiction of the Board is not exclusive. … Plaintiff is not attempting to oust the Board of jurisdiction by urging a question of law or fact that the Board is without jurisdiction. In Woollard v. Schaffer Stores Co. ( 272 N.