Case law

Burckle v. . Eckhart

3 N.Y. 132 · New York Court of Appeals · Dec 5, 1849

(Brown v. Brown, 1 Barb. Ch. Pr. 215, 216; 8 Paige, 443 .) … (Bents v. Graves, 3 McCord’s R. 280; Overstreet v. Brown , 4 id. 80.)

People ex rel. Gonzales v. Dalsheim

52 N.Y.2d 9 · New York Court of Appeals · Dec 22, 1980

The criterion we again said was whether the parolee was “subject to the convenience and the practical control of the Parole Board” (People ex rel. Walsh v Vincent, 40 NY2d 1049, 1050 , supra). … Matter of Higgins v New York State Div. of Parole, 72 AD2d 583 .)

Claim of Estupinan v. Cleanorama Drive-In Cleaners

27 N.Y.2d 867 · New York Court of Appeals · Nov 12, 1970

People Ex Rel. McMackin v. . Bd. of Police

107 N.Y. 235 · New York Court of Appeals · Oct 25, 1887

The alternative writ having been issued and served, it is claimed by appellants’ counsel that there is no issue raised by the return of the board, and that the two individuals who are members of the board should not have … When a board of public officers stands at a tie, so that no return putting at issue the material facts alleged in the alternative writ can be agreed upon by a majority of the board, we are not inclined to reverse the action

People v. Bolling

79 N.Y.2d 317 · New York Court of Appeals · Apr 3, 1992

— Rethinking Sixth Amendment Doctrine, Images, and Procedures, 64 NC L Rev 501, 560-561 *330 [1986]; Brown, McGuire and Winters, The Peremptory Challenge as a Manipulative Device in Criminal Trials: Traditional Use or Abuse … Kraemer, 334 US 1 , and Brown v Board of Educ., 349 US 294 ).

Pokoik v. Silsdorf

40 N.Y.2d 769 · New York Court of Appeals · Dec 2, 1976

However, this case fits into the "special facts exception” to that rule so that the zoning ordinance, as amended, does not apply and the arbitrary action of the board *773 may not prevail (Matter of Golisano v Town Bd. of … Town of Huntington, 39 AD2d 945 ; Matter of Golisano v Town Bd. of Town of Macedon, supra; Matter of Dubow v Boss, 254 App Div 706 ; 1 Anderson, NY Zoning Law & Practice, § 6.17).

People v. Davis

36 N.Y.2d 280 · New York Court of Appeals · Mar 26, 1975

where there was no supplementation by any additional behavior raising the level of inference from suspicion to probable cause, more must be .shown to form the basis for a warrantless arrest and an incidental search (People v. … Russell, 34 N Y 2d 261, 264; People v. Brown, 32 N Y 2d 172, 174; People v. Brown, 24 N Y 2d 421, 423; People v. Corrado, 22 N Y 2d 308, 311, 313). This is not a case where, as in People v.

Claim of Pfeffer v. Parkside Caterers, Inc.

42 N.Y.2d 59 · New York Court of Appeals · Jun 16, 1977

(E.g., Matter of Holland v Edwards, 307 NY 38, 44 ; Matter of Avon Bar & Grill v O’Connell, 301 NY 150, 153 ; 1 NY Jur, Administrative Law, § 192.) … judicial review (compare Matter of Jacob v Town of Glenville, 43 AD2d 409 ; supra; Matter of Winter v Camp Scatico, 7 AD2d 812 ; Matter of Derion v Gilford Mfg.

Claim of Kelly v. New York City Transit Authority

33 N.Y.2d 373 · New York Court of Appeals · Feb 20, 1974

(Matter of Guggenheim v. Hedke & Co., 32 A D 2d 1017, affd. 27 N Y 2d 596.) As to admissibility, the first sentence removes what would otherwise be the categorical bar of the hearsay rule as to all testimony. … The Appellate Division properly reversed the decision of the Workmen’s Compensation Board disallowing the claim a- d, accordingly, the final determination of the board appealed fr m, made upon remission by the Appellate Division

Maleeny v. . Standard Shipbuilding Corp.

237 N.Y. 250 · New York Court of Appeals · Dec 27, 1923

Referring to the case of Steamboat Company v. Chase ( 16 Wall. 522 ) Mr. Justice Brown in Knapp, Stout & Co. v. McCaffrey ( 177 U. … The cases of Johnson & Co. v. Johansen (86 Fed. Rep. 886); The Lackawanna (151 Fed. Rep. 499); Carter v. Brown (212 Fed. Rep. 393), were actions in admiralty.

People v. Borges

69 N.Y.2d 1031 · New York Court of Appeals · Jun 11, 1987

Conyers, 68 NY2d 982, 983 ; Brown v Illinois, 422 US 590, 603-604 ). … Conyers, supra; Brown v Illinois, supra; see, 3 LaFave, Search and Seizure § 8.2 [d], at 193-194 [2d ed]).

People v. Sorge

301 N.Y. 198 · New York Court of Appeals · Jul 11, 1950

(People v. Webster, 139 N. Y. 73, 84 ; see, also, People v. Jones, 297 N. Y. 459 ; People v. Brown, 284 N. Y. 753 ; People v. Johnston, 228 N. Y. 332, 340 ; People v. Casey, 72 N. … (See, e.g., People v. Brown, supra, 284 N. Y. 753 ; cf. People v. Goldstein, 295 N. Y. 61, 65 ; People v. Thau, 219 N. Y. 39, 42 .)

Matter of Gonzalez v. Northeast Parent & Child Socy.

2026 NY Slip Op 01443 · New York Court of Appeals · Mar 17, 2026

v South Colonie Ind. … Colon v Martin , 35 NY3d 75, 80 [2020]; Alifieris v American Airlines , 63 NY2d 370, 376 [1984]; People v Suber , 19 NY3d 247, 253 [2012]).

People v. Stith

69 N.Y.2d 313 · New York Court of Appeals · Mar 26, 1987

Similarly, "the detrimental consequences of illegal police action [may] become so attenuated” that the taint of the initial misconduct is dissipated (Brown v Illinois, supra, at 609 [Powell, J., concurring in part]). … Williams, 467 US 431 ; Brown v Illinois, 422 US 590 ; Wong Sun v United States, 371 US 471 ; Silverthorne Lbr.

Decker v. Furniss

4 N.Y. 611 · New York Court of Appeals · Jul 1, 1856

Brown sells,” &c., imports of itself an executed sale. … Shaw, 7 Wend., 404 ; Outwater v. Dodge, 7 Cow., 85 ; McDonald v. Hewett, 15 John, 349; Rusk v. Davis. 2 Maul, & Sel., 397).

Sprague v. . City of Rochester

159 N.Y. 20 · New York Court of Appeals · Apr 18, 1899

Satterlee v. Board of Police, 15 N. Y. 38, 41 .) If a complaint was made to a member of the board that a sidewalk was out of repair he simply telephoned to the foreman to look after it. … (McNally v. City of Cohoes, 127 N. Y. 350 , 353 ; Smith v. City of Rochester, 79 Hun, 174 ; 150 N. Y. 581 .)

Young v. United States Mortgage & Trust Co.

214 N.Y. 279 · New York Court of Appeals · Feb 25, 1915

(Danforth v. Schoharie & D. Turnpike Road, 12 Johns. 227 ; Dunn v. Rector, etc., of St. Andrew’s Church, 14 Johns. 118 ; Bank of Columbia v. Patterson’s Administrator, 7 Cranch, 299 ; Bank of the United States v. … Dandridge, 12 Wheat. 64 ; Corinne Mill, Canal & Stock Co. v. Toponce, 152 U. S. 405 ; Curtis v. Leavitt, 15 N. Y. 1, 48 ; Hooker v. Eagle Bank of Rochester, 30 N. Y. 83 ; Farmers’ Loan & Trust Co. v. Housatonic R. R.

Uniformed Firefighters Ass'n of Greater New York v. City of New York

79 N.Y.2d 236 · New York Court of Appeals · Mar 26, 1992

cases cited therein]; Matter of Board of Educ. v Lewis, 67 Misc 2d 770 ; 7A Weinstein-Kom-Miller, NY Civ Prac 6301.05, at 63-13, 63-14). … merits of such disputes, a matter best left to the “impartial body with expertise in th[at] area” (see, Matter of Levitt v Board of Collective Bargaining, 79 NY2d 120, 128 ; Matter of Board of Educ. v New York State Pub.

Nilan v. Colleran

283 N.Y. 84 · New York Court of Appeals · May 28, 1940

(Polin v. Kaplan, 257 N. Y. 277, 281 .) … (O’ Keefe v. Local 463, 277 N. Y. 300 .) Since it has not been shown that the action of the executive board was taken in bad faith and with malice, plaintiff may not succeed.

Bradley v. . Bradley

165 N.Y. 183 · New York Court of Appeals · Dec 11, 1900

(Murray v. Hay, 1 Barb. Ch. 59 ; Wood v. Perry, 1 Barb. 114 ; Foot v. Bronson, 4 Lans. 47 ; Emery v. Erskine, 66 Barb. 9 ; Brinkerhoff v. Brown, 6 Johns. Ch. 139 ; Strobel v. Kerr Salt Co., 164 N. Y. 303 ; Smith v. … Schulting, 14 Hun, 52 ; Kennedy v. City of Troy, ib. 308 ; Kellogg v. Siple, 11 App. Div. 458 ; Simar v. Canaday 53 N. Y. 298 ; Shields v. Barrow, 17 How. [U. S.] 130 ; Williams v. Bankhead, 19 Wall. 563 ; Brown v.