Case law

Consolidated Edison Co. v. Hoffman

43 N.Y.2d 598 · New York Court of Appeals · Feb 14, 1978

Co. v Griffin, 272 App Div 551 , supra; Matter of Long Is. Water Corp. v Michaelis, 28 AD2d 887 ). … Co. v City of Long Beach, 280 App Div 823 , supra; Northport Water Works Co. v Carll, 133 NYS2d 859 ).

Wright v. . Shanahan

149 N.Y. 495 · New York Court of Appeals · May 26, 1896

(Robinson v. Chamberlain, 34 N. Y. 389 ; McCarthy v. City of Syracuse, 46 N. Y. 194 ; Smith v. City of Rochester, 92 N. Y. 473 ; People v. Canal Board, 55 N. Y. 390 ; St. Peter v. Denison, 58 N. Y. 416 ; Hover v. … Y. 113 ; Adsit v. Brady, 4 Hill, 630 .)

Overhill Building Co. v. Delany

28 N.Y.2d 449 · New York Court of Appeals · May 26, 1971

Additionally, the board, relying on Matter of Sherman v. … In Matter of Sherman v. Gustafson (28 A D 2d 1082, affd. 22 N Y 2d 793), the Appellate Division reversed an order of the Supreme Court nullifying a zoning board determination denying a variance.

Claim of Tecce v. McKesson & Robbins, Inc.

20 N.Y.2d 779 · New York Court of Appeals · Sep 28, 1967

Barr v. Wackman

36 N.Y.2d 371 · New York Court of Appeals · Apr 1, 1975

(See, e.g., Robinson v Smith, 3 Paige Ch 222, 233; Brinckerhoff v Bostwick, 88 NY 52, 59-60 , writ of error dsmd 106 US 3 ; Sage v Culver, 147 NY 241, 245-247 ). … Hun v Cary, 82 NY 65, 73-74 ; Kavanaugh v Commonwealth Trust Co., supra; Matter of Cohen v Cocoline Prods., 309 NY 119,123 .)

In re the Appointment of a Successor Trustee of the Trust under the Will of Phipps

2 N.Y.2d 105 · New York Court of Appeals · Nov 16, 1956

(Weeks v. Frankel, 197 N. Y. 304, 310 ; see, also, Matter of Reed v. Browne, 295 N. Y. 184, 189 ; Rose v. Hatch, 125 N. Y. 427, 431-432 ; Matter of Farrell, 133 App. Div. 97, 99 , affd. 198 N. … There are a number of cases — and we have already adverted to some of them (see, e.g., Matter of Reed v. Browne, supra, 295 N. Y. 184 ; Weeks v. Frankel, supra, 197 N. Y. 304, 310 ; Matter of Farrell, supra, 198 N.

MATTER OF STARNELLA v. Bratton

92 N.Y.2d 836 · New York Court of Appeals · Jun 16, 1998

Concluding that Sergeant Gasparino suffered an accidental injury as a matter of law (Matter of Canfora v Board of Trustees, 60 NY2d 347 ), we reverse the Appellate Division order denying his petition. … ; Matter of Danyi v Board of Trustees, 176 AD2d 451 ).

The Matter of Robert Morgan III v. Bill de Blasio

29 N.Y.3d 559 · New York Court of Appeals · Aug 31, 2017

Appellants rely on Matter of O’Brien v Seneca County Bd. of Elections (22 AD3d 1036, 1036 [4th Dept 2005]) and Matter of Seaman v Bird (176 AD2d 1061, 1062 [3d Dept 1991]), to argue that, because complete relief could be … obtained from the Board of Elections, the Executive Board of the Working Families Party is not a necessary party.

Claim of Doca v. Federal Stevedoring Co.

308 N.Y. 44 · New York Court of Appeals · Dec 3, 1954

In another case, Meaney v. Keating ( 305 N. Y. 660 ), decided the same day as Doca v. Federal Stevedoring Co. … Attention is called, also, to Matter of Bollard v. Engel ( 278 N. Y. 463 ) and similar cases (Matter of Kleid v. Carr Bros., 300 N.

Minister, Elders & Deacons of the Reformed Protestant Dutch Church v. Madison Avenue Building Co.

214 N.Y. 268 · New York Court of Appeals · Feb 25, 1915

In Hurley v. Brown ( 44 App. … (See, also, Johnson v. Jones, 244 Pa. St. 386; McMurtry v. Phillips Investment Co., 103 Ky. 308 ; Hutchinson v. Ulrich, 145 Ill. 336 .)

Guryev v. Tomchinsky

20 N.Y.3d 194 · New York Court of Appeals · Dec 11, 2012

The other defendants in this action are the condominium; its Board of Managers (the Board), the entity responsible for the building’s day-to-day operation and management; and the Trump Corporation (Trump), the Board’s managing … State of New York, 15 NY3d 50, 56 [2010], citing Abbatiello v Lancaster Studio Assoc., 3 NY3d 46 [2004], and Scaparo v Village of Ilion, 13 NY3d 864 [2009] [internal quotation marks omitted]).

Rodgers v. Village of Tarrytown

302 N.Y. 115 · New York Court of Appeals · Jan 18, 1951

App. 2d 146, 152 ; Cassel v. Mayor & City Council of Baltimore, 73 A. 2d 486 , 488 — 489 [Md.]; Board of Co. Comrs. of Anne *124 Arundel Co. v. Snyder, 186 Md. 342, 345-346 ; Leahy v. … That being so, the board of trustees followed approved procedure by changing the General Zoning Ordinance itself. (See, e.g., Matter of Clark v. Board of Zoning Appeals, 301 N. Y. 86, 91 .)

Claim of Collins v. Dukes Plumbing & Sewer Service, Inc.

17 N.Y.3d 906 · New York Court of Appeals · Nov 15, 2011

OPINION OF THE COURT Order affirmed, with costs (see Matter of Raynor v Landmark Chrysler, 18 NY3d 48 [2011] [decided today]). Concur: Judges Ciparick, Graffeo, Read, Smith, Pigott and Jones.

Verdi v. Mattera

32 N.Y.2d 837 · New York Court of Appeals · May 23, 1973

Forrest v. Evershed

7 N.Y.2d 256 · New York Court of Appeals · Dec 30, 1959

Board of Standards & Appeals, 266 N. Y. 270, 275 ; Matter of Clark v. Board of Zoning Appeals, 301 N. Y. 86, 90 ; Matter of Crossroads Recreation v. Broz, supra, p. 45; see, also, Matter of Graham v. … Y., p. 76; accord Matter of Hickox v. Griffin, 298 N. Y. 365 ; Matter of Clark v. Board of Zoning Appeals, supra, p. 91; Matter of Young Women’s *263 Hebrew Assn. v.

Altschul v. . Ludwig

216 N.Y. 459 · New York Court of Appeals · Jan 4, 1916

(Doolittle v. Supervisors of Broome Co., 18 N. Y. 155 ; Roosevelt v. Draper, 23 N. Y. 318, 323 ; People v. Ingersoll, 58 N. Y. 1 ; Kilbourne v. St. John, 59 N. Y. 21 ; Guest v. City of Brooklyn, 69 N. Y. 506 .) … (Rogers v. O’ Brien, supra; Warrin v. Baldwin, 105 N. Y. 534 ; Ziegler v. Chapin, 126 N. Y. 342 ; Peck v. Belknap, 130 N. Y. 394 ; Talcott v. City of Buffalo, 125 N. Y. 280 .)

People Ex Rel. Wells Newton Co. v. . Craig

232 N.Y. 125 · New York Court of Appeals · Nov 22, 1921

(Titusville Iron Co. v. City of New York, 207 N. Y. 203 .) … (Johnson v. City of New York, 191 App. Div. 205 ; affd., 231 N. Y. 564 .)

Collins v. Hammock

52 N.Y.2d 798 · New York Court of Appeals · Dec 22, 1980

Petitioner sought a new parole release hearing based upon a number of claimed errors in the procedure followed by the superintendent and the board. … for the hearing by seeking employment so that he could present a work plan, that the board improperly considered the third disciplinary violation, and that those errors required a new hearing.

Bradford Central School District v. Ambach

56 N.Y.2d 158 · New York Court of Appeals · May 11, 1982

(Matter of Dairylea Coop. v Walkley, supra, at p 11.) … (Boryszewski v Brydges, supra, at p 364.)

Sinnott v. Monahan

54 N.Y.2d 946 · New York Court of Appeals · Oct 22, 1981