Case law

Claim of Leonard v. New York City Housing Authority

33 N.Y.2d 891 · New York Court of Appeals · Dec 27, 1973

In the Matter of Adult Home at Erie Station, Inc. v. Assessor and Board of Assessment Review of City of Middletown

9 N.Y.3d 1015 · New York Court of Appeals · Jan 10, 2008

Taub v. Pirnie

3 N.Y.2d 188 · New York Court of Appeals · Jul 3, 1957

(Matter of Kilgus v. Board of Estimate of City of N. Y., 308 N. Y, *194 620, 628; Matter of Weekes v. O’Connell, 304 N. Y. 259, 265 ; see, also, Morgan v. United States, 304 U. S. 1, 18 .) … Matter of Kilgus v. Board of Estimate of City of N. Y., supra, 308 N. Y. 620, 628 .)

People Morgan v. . Bd. of Supervisors of Westchester Cty.

129 N.Y. 638 · New York Court of Appeals · Dec 15, 1891

People v. Matienzo

81 N.Y.2d 778 · New York Court of Appeals · Jan 19, 1993

As the officer watched, defendant removed a small plastic bag from a brown paper bag and handed it to another man in exchange for money. … Shea and Fitzgerald followed defendant into the store, where defendant discarded a brown paper bag.

People Ex Rel. Hudson-Harlem Valley Title & Mortgage Co. v. Walker

282 N.Y. 400 · New York Court of Appeals · Apr 16, 1940

Greene Associates, Inc., v. Murdock, 249 App. Div. 622 ; affd., 273 N. Y. 506 ; Matter of Tenlan Realty Corp. v. Board of Standards and Appeals, 251 App. Div. 311 ; affd., 276 N. … , it was error for the Special Term to substitute its judgment for that of the board (Matter of Rubel Corp. v.

Claim of Johnson v. Buffalo & Erie County Private Industry Council

84 N.Y.2d 13 · New York Court of Appeals · Jun 21, 1994

The carrier also requested that the Board formally close claimant’s file. … The Board also noted that "a carrier’s lien attaches to any recovery other than first party benefits under the Insurance Law.” The Appellate Division reversed the Board’s determination ( 192 AD2d 763 ).

MATTER OF SASSO v. Osgood

86 N.Y.2d 374 · New York Court of Appeals · Oct 19, 1995

variance cases without substantial difficulty (see, e.g., Matter of Village Bd. v Jarrold, 53 NY2d 254 ; see also, Holy Sepulchre Cemetery v Board of Appeals, 271 App Div 33 ; Matter of Fasani v Rappaport, 30 AD2d 588 ; … IV Applying the new statute we conclude that the action of the Henderson Zoning Board was rational and not arbitrary and capricious (see, Matter of Cowan v Kern, 41 NY2d 591 , 599, supra; McGowan v Cohalan, 41 NY2d 434 ,

Elkin v. D. & J. Cleaners, Inc.

11 N.Y.2d 885 · New York Court of Appeals · Apr 5, 1962

Schwartz v. Heffernan

304 N.Y. 474 · New York Court of Appeals · Nov 20, 1952

Frank v. … Frank v.

Ayres v. Village of Hammondsport

3 Silv. Ct. App. 614 · New York Court of Appeals · Dec 22, 1891

Brown, J. This action was brought to recover for injuries sustained from a fall upon an icy sidewalk. … The sidewalk at that point, was constructed of boards, was about ten feet wide, and extended longitudinally thirty feet, the whole length of the hotel.

People v. Samuels

50 N.Y.2d 1035 · New York Court of Appeals · Jul 3, 1980

Defandant argues that Brown v Texas ( 443 US 47 ) requires reversal and the granting of his motion to suppress. We disagree. … People v Howard, 50 NY2d 583 ).

Matter of Lampert v. . Siemons

235 N.Y. 311 · New York Court of Appeals · Mar 23, 1923

(Tallon v. Interborough Rapid Transit Co., 232 N. Y. 410 ; Matter of Schultz v. Champion Welding & Manufacturing Co., 230 N. Y. 309 ; Matter of Kowalek v. N. Y. Cons. R. R. Co., 229 N. Y 489; Matter of McInerney v. … (Matter of Littler v. Fuller Co., 223 N. Y. 369 .)

Claim of Smith v. General Electric Co.

17 N.Y.2d 687 · New York Court of Appeals · Mar 31, 1966

Judges Fuld, Van Voorhis and Scileppi dissent and vote to reverse and to dismiss the claim upon the ground that there is no substantial evidence to support the board’s award.

Matter of Reed v. Bd. of Standards Appeals

255 N.Y. 126 · New York Court of Appeals · Jan 6, 1931

(See Matter of Riker v. Board of Standards & Appeals, 225 App. Div. 570 .) The plans on which the Board passed on July 17, 1928, were not the same as those submitted in 1927. … The Board has a wide scope in the exercise of its discretion whenever the discretion to make variances is granted to it. (Matter of Goldenberg v. Walsh, 242 N. Y. 576 ; People ex rel. Fordham M. R. Church v.

Leveille v. Sander

30 N.Y.2d 918 · New York Court of Appeals · Jul 6, 1972

Claim of Vukel v. New York Water & Sewer Mains, Inc.

94 N.Y.2d 494 · New York Court of Appeals · Feb 29, 2000

However, relying on Matter of Gulitz v International Bus. Machs. … We disagree and conclude that the Board was bound by, and failed to adhere to, its own rules requiring notice of proceedings to interested parties (see, Matter of Frick v Bahou, 56 NY2d 777, 778 ).

People v. Martinez

37 N.Y.2d 662 · New York Court of Appeals · Oct 28, 1975

(Brown v *667 Illinois, 422 US 590, 603, 604 , supra.) … See, e.g., CPL 60.45 (subd 1); Brown v Illinois ( 422 US 590 , supra); United States v Owen (492 F2d 1100); United States v Davis (456 F2d 1192); United States v Close (349 F2d 841, cert den 382 US 992 ); People v Spano (

Claim of Dorman v. New Process Gear Division Chrysler Corp.

35 N.Y.2d 975 · New York Court of Appeals · Jan 20, 1975

Claim of Glamm v. City of Amsterdam

42 N.Y.2d 1026 · New York Court of Appeals · Oct 4, 1977