Case law
Opinions from 1658 to today.
10,000+ results
1.03s
Cent. Square Teachers Ass'n v. Bd. of Educ. of the Cent. Square Cent. Sch. Dist.
52 N.Y.2d 918 · New York Court of Appeals · Feb 10, 1981
Cited 18 timesPublished9 N.Y.3d 932 · New York Court of Appeals · Oct 11, 2007
Cited 1 timesPublished42 N.Y.3d 668 · New York Court of Appeals · Jun 20, 2024
First, the purpose of SORA is to protect the public from "the danger of recidivism posed by sex offenders" ( Brown , 41 NY3d at 296; People v Mingo , 12 NY3d 563, 574 [2009]). … Brown , 41 NY3d 279 , 296 [2023], citing Correction Law § 168-l).
Cited 16 timesPublished35 N.Y.2d 788 · New York Court of Appeals · Nov 15, 1974
Cited 0 timesPublishedClaims of Markowitz v. Mack Markowitz, Inc.
21 N.Y.2d 856 · New York Court of Appeals · Feb 28, 1968
Cited 0 timesPublished8 N.Y.2d 1024 · New York Court of Appeals · Oct 6, 1960
Cited 0 timesPublished8 N.Y.2d 1120 · New York Court of Appeals · Nov 17, 1960
Cited 0 timesPublished95 N.Y.2d 671 · New York Court of Appeals · Feb 8, 2001
v Board of Regents, 299 NY 469, 476 ). … v Board of Regents, supra, at 373).
Cited 22 timesPublishedClaim of Lapinsky v. Ardom Bake Shop, Inc.
13 N.Y.2d 1163 · New York Court of Appeals · Jan 23, 1964
Order affirmed, with costs to respondent Workmen’s Compensation Board; no opinion. *1165 Concur: Chief Judge Desmond and Judges Dye, Fuld, Burke and Scileppi.
Cited 1 timesPublished77 N.Y. 312 · New York Court of Appeals · May 20, 1879
(Lawrence v. Taylor, 5 Hill, 115 .) But not so when the action is to enforce the contract or recover dam *319 ages. (Judson v. Cross, 11 J. R, 95; Johnson v. Wygant 11 Wend.,48; McWilliams v. … (Heron v. Hoffman, 3 Bawl., 393, 400; Bank of Columbia v. Hagner, 1 Peters, 464 ; Trevor v. Halsted, 23 Wend., 66 .)
Cited 57 timesPublished57 N.Y. 363 · New York Court of Appeals · May 5, 1874
Browning and Jacob W. … (See Bank of Charleston v. Elmeric, 2 Sand. [Sup. Court], 718; Jarvis v. Sewall, 40 Barb., 449, 455 ; Rockwell v. Merwin, 45 N. Y., 166, 168 .)
Cited 5 timesPublishedClaim of Lazarus v. Jayso Electronics Corp.
19 N.Y.2d 616 · New York Court of Appeals · Jan 19, 1967
Cited 1 timesPublishedClaim of Guido v. Terra-Rube Construction Corp.
10 N.Y.2d 858 · New York Court of Appeals · Oct 19, 1961
Cited 1 timesPublishedMATTER OF 61 JANE ST. ASSOCS. v. New York City Conciliation & Appeals Bd.
65 N.Y.2d 898 · New York Court of Appeals · Jul 11, 1985
Cited 88 timesPublishedClaim of Lewis v. College Knitting Mills, Inc.
31 N.Y.2d 727 · New York Court of Appeals · Nov 1, 1972
Cited 1 timesPublished98 N.Y. 222 · New York Court of Appeals · Mar 3, 1885
The powers exercised by boards of audit are judicial in their nature. (Vedder v. Superintendents, 5 Den. 564 .) … (See Van Wormer v. Mayor, etc., 15 Wend. 262 ; White v. Coatsworth, 6 N. Y. 137 .) The decisions of boards of audit have been considered as embraced within the principle. ■ (Supervisor's of Chenango v.
Cited 104 timesPublishedBoard of Education of Union Free School District No. 2 v. New York State Division of Human Rights
44 N.Y. 902 · New York Court of Appeals · Jun 8, 1978
Respondents, State Division of Human Rights and State Human Rights Appeal Board, seek to have appellant, board of education, held in contempt for violating an order of the Appellate Division- dated June 25, 1973 directing … Moreover, regardless of which course is pursued, in a case such as this where "only enforcement of private rights” as opposed to "vindication] [of] a public interest” is sought (Union Free School Dist. v New York State Human
Cited 0 timesPublished
Ask Donna