Case law

Opinions from 1658 to today.

Filtersny

10,000+ results

0.42s

  • Cahn v. Town of Huntington

    29 N.Y.2d 451 · New York Court of Appeals · Jan 13, 1972

    Board of Higher Educ. of City of N. Y., 260 App. Div. 9 ; Reynolds v. Village of Ossining, 102 App. Div. 298 ; People ex rel. Sherrill v. Guggenheimer, 47 App. … Matter of O’Hara v. Harwood, 251 App. Div. 612 ; Rockefeller v. Taylor, 69 App. Div. 176 , supra-, People ex rel. McMillen v. Vanderpoel, 35 App. Div. 73 ; Adee v. Arnow, 91 Hun 329 , supra.)

    Cited 70 timesPublished
  • Currie v. Town of Davenport

    32 N.Y.2d 899 · New York Court of Appeals · May 31, 1973

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • Petrella v. Siegel

    73 N.Y.2d 846 · New York Court of Appeals · Dec 22, 1988

    In addition to the express obligation to comply with all applicable provisions of law, community school superintendents have the same powers and duties with respect to the schools under their community board’s jurisdiction … pursuant to Education Law §2565 (2), the resolutions of the community school board purportedly accepting his oral resignation and terminating his employment were inoperative and were properly annulled by both lower courts

    Cited 3 timesPublished
  • Ek v. Travis

    5 N.Y.3d 862 · New York Court of Appeals · Nov 17, 2005

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • Green v. Clarke

    2 N.Y. 343 · New York Court of Appeals · Mar 15, 1855

    (Dawes v. Peck, 8 T. R., 330; Brown on Actions at Law, 200; 1 Chitty's Pleadings, 6.) … (Brown’s Actions at Law, 200; 1 Ch. Pl., 134, 5; Dawes v. Peck, 8 T. R., 330.)

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • Commco, Inc. v. Amelkin

    62 N.Y.2d 260 · New York Court of Appeals · May 15, 1984

    Steward v Board of R. R. Comrs., 160 NY 202, 212 ; cf. Rommell v Walsh, 127 Conn 16; Zoning Bd. v Dragon Run Terrace, 59 Del 175). . … v Board of Appeal, 332 Mass 178). .

    Cited 36 timesPublished
  • People v. Testa

    61 N.Y.2d 1008 · New York Court of Appeals · Mar 29, 1984

    In each case the facts must be examined to determine the nature of the material placed before the jury and the likelihood that prejudice would be engendered” (People v Brown, 48 NY2d 388, 394 ; see People v Pickett, 61 NY2d … Brown, supra, at p 393 ).

    Cited 37 timesPublished
  • Claim of Toro v. 1700 First Avenue Corp.

    12 N.Y.2d 1001 · New York Court of Appeals · Feb 28, 1963

    Cited 2 timesPublished
  • Dinardo v. City of New York

    13 N.Y.3d 872 · New York Court of Appeals · Dec 1, 2009

    The Board of Education now argues that the conduct alleged to have constituted a promise to act on her behalf was discretionary government action, which cannot be a basis for liability (see McLean v City of New York, 12 NY3d … 194, 202-203 [2009]; Tango v Tulevech, 61 NY2d 34, 40-41 [1983]).

    Cited 42 timesPublished
  • Claim of Skinner v. Tobin Packing Co.

    18 N.Y.2d 738 · New York Court of Appeals · Sep 29, 1966

    Judge VAN Voorhis concurs upon the following ground: The requirement outlined in the opinion of Matter of Marks v. Gray ( 251 N. … Y. 90 ) that the business errand should have prompted the trip appears to have been overruled in Matter of Mahoney v.

    Cited 1 timesPublished
  • People v. Patrick Labate

    New York Court of Appeals · Mar 21, 2024

    Anderson, 66 NY2d 529, 535 n 1 [1985]; see also People v Sinistaj, 67 NY2d 236, 239 [1986]; People v Price, 14 NY3d 61, 64 [2010]; Brown, 28 NY3d at 403). … Our most recent explanation of that test is set forth in People v Brown, which we decided with two companion cases—People v Young and People v Canady.

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • Matter of Berman v. Bd. of Elections of the County of Nassau

    68 N.Y.2d 761 · New York Court of Appeals · Aug 28, 1986

    We hold otherwise (see, Matter of Roman v Power, 10 NY2d 793 ; Matter of Kowal v Dmochowski, 14 AD2d 665 , affd 10 NY2d 784 ; see also, Matter of Manz, 17 AD2d 719; 2 Gassman, Election Law § 120, at 771-772 [2d ed]). … Hayduk, 59 AD2d 706 , affd 42 NY2d 1062 ; Matter of Bruno v Ackerson, 51 AD2d 1051 , affd 39 NY2d 718 ; Matter of Sahler v Callahan, 92 AD2d 976 [all involving orders lacking a date before which substituted service had to

    Cited 14 timesPublished
  • Matter of Zivitz v. J & S Meat Corp.

    67 N.Y.2d 868 · New York Court of Appeals · Mar 27, 1986

    Cited 3 timesPublished
  • Friedman v. Hammock

    54 N.Y.2d 799 · New York Court of Appeals · Sep 17, 1981

    Cited 3 timesPublished
  • People v. Johnson

    11 N.Y.3d 416 · New York Court of Appeals · Nov 24, 2008

    As the Appellate Division pointed out, we have referred to provisions governing the age of children in child pornography statutes as “victim age provisions” (Matter of North v Board of Examiners of Sex Offenders of State … ]; Matter of New York State Bd. of Examiners of Sex Offenders v Ransom, 249 AD2d 891, 892 [4th Dept 1998] [“The Board . . . serves only in an advisory capacity that is similar to the role served by a probation department

    Cited 272 timesPublished
  • Liggett v. Lew Realty LLC

    42 N.Y.3d 415 · New York Court of Appeals · Jun 20, 2024

    When Brown died in 1998—the sole recorded tenant of the apartment—he paid $141.23 in rent per month. … Upon Brown's death, Edward McKinney claimed to be Brown's successor to the rent-controlled apartment under Braschi v Stahl Assoc. Co. ( 74 NY2d 201 [1989]).

    Cited 12 timesPublished
  • Claim of Brisson v. County of Onondaga

    5 N.Y.3d 820 · New York Court of Appeals · Sep 20, 2005

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • MATTER OF CITY OF SYRACUSE v. State Bd. of Equalization & Assessment

    64 N.Y.2d 894 · New York Court of Appeals · Mar 19, 1985

    Cited 12 timesPublished
  • People v. . Raffo

    180 N.Y. 434 · New York Court of Appeals · Feb 21, 1905

    Brown’s lawn, where they both fell to the ground. … (See Daly v. People, 32 Hun, 182 ; 2 N. Y. Crim. 159; People v. Gallo, supra; People v. Barone, 161 N. Y. 451 ; 14 N. Y. Crim. 351). * Compare the Wilson brother oases: People v. L. R. Wilson, 141 N. Y. 185 ; 9 N. Y.

    Cited 1 timesPublished
  • Warren v. . Parkhurst

    186 N.Y. 45 · New York Court of Appeals · Oct 2, 1906

    Chipman v. Palmer ( 77 N. … Y. 51 ) was not a suit in equity, but an action to recover damages suffered by the keeper of a boarding house near a stream against the keeper of another boarding house further up the stream for polluting the stream by sewerage

    Cited 20 timesPublished

Ask Donna

Ask Donna

A word about cookies

We need a few to keep you signed in and the library working. The rest help us see which pages people use and where they get stuck. They stay off unless you say yes.