Case law

Opinions from 1658 to today.

Filtersny

10,000+ results

1.15s

  • MATTER OF THWAITES PLACE ASSOCS. v. New York City Conciliation & Appeals Bd.

    54 N.Y.2d 798 · New York Court of Appeals · Sep 17, 1981

    Cited 7 timesPublished
  • Claim of McKay v. Republic Vanguard Insurance

    20 N.Y.2d 884 · New York Court of Appeals · Nov 2, 1967

    Order affirmed, with costs to respondent Workmen’s Compensation Board; no opinion. Concur: Chief Judge Fuld and Judges Vast Voorhis, Burke, Scileppi, Bergan, Keating and Breitel.

    Cited 2 timesPublished
  • Matter of McLaurin v. New York City Tr. Auth.

    2025 NY Slip Op 06529 · New York Court of Appeals · Nov 24, 2025

    No. 89 In the Matter of the Claim of Sheldon Matthews, Respondent, v New York City Transit Authority, Appellant. Workers' Compensation Board, Respondent. … In the Matter of the Claim of Melissa Anderson, Respondent, v City of Yonkers, Appellant. Workers' Compensation Board, Respondent.

    Cited 4 timesPublished
  • Angletti v. Morreale

    25 N.Y.3d 794 · New York Court of Appeals · Aug 26, 2015

    The certificate was received by the Board on July 17, 2015. … ; Matter of O’Connor v Power, 30 AD2d 926 [2d Dept 1968], affd 22 NY2d 889 [1968]).

    Cited 10 timesPublished
  • Thayer v. Baybutt

    24 N.Y.2d 1018 · New York Court of Appeals · May 28, 1969

    Cited 6 timesPublished
  • Stabak v. ISS International

    92 N.Y.2d 891 · New York Court of Appeals · Aug 31, 1998

    Motion, insofar as it seeks leave to appeal from that part of the Appellate Division order that affirmed the decision of the Workers’ Compensation Board denying reconsideration, dismissed upon the ground that such part of

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • Anonymous v. Bureau of Professional Medical Conduct

    2 N.Y.3d 663 · New York Court of Appeals · Jun 29, 2004

    In Doe v Office of Professional Med. … Karlin v Culkin, 248 NY 465, 478 [1928] [Cardozo, Ch. J.] [referring to the legal profession]).

    Cited 3 timesPublished
  • Claim of Washington v. New York City Housing Authority

    24 N.Y.2d 912 · New York Court of Appeals · Apr 24, 1969

    Cited 2 timesPublished
  • Claim of Khan v. Omne Staffing, Inc.

    11 N.Y.3d 884 · New York Court of Appeals · Dec 17, 2008

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • Svenningsen v. Passidomo

    62 N.Y.2d 967 · New York Court of Appeals · Jun 29, 1984

    Petitioners commenced this article 78 proceeding alleging that the Town Board’s conditions were arbitrary, unreasonable and constituted an abuse of discretion. … Kerr, 35 NY2d 507, 511 ; Matter of Bologno v O’Connell, 7 NY2d 155 ; Matter of Harper v Zoning Bd. of Appeals, 55 AD2d 405, 411-413 , affd 43 NY2d 980 ).

    Cited 9 timesPublished
  • Matter of Tappis v. New York State Racing & Wagering Bd., Harness Racing Div.

    36 N.Y.2d 862 · New York Court of Appeals · May 13, 1975

    in its confirmation by the Board. … (Matter of Sanford v Rockefeller, 35 NY2d 547 ; Matter of Jerry v Board of Educ. of City School Dist. of Syracuse, 35 NY2d 534; cf. Arnett v Kennedy, 416 US 134 .)

    Cited 12 timesPublished
  • Weinstein v. . Weber

    178 N.Y. 94 · New York Court of Appeals · Mar 15, 1904

    Within the rule of the decision in Mutual Life Insurance Company v. Shipman, ( 119 N. … But, to use the language in Moore v.

    Cited 9 timesPublished
  • Buffalo Sewer Authority v. Town of Cheektowaga

    20 N.Y.2d 47 · New York Court of Appeals · May 31, 1967

    The Town Board of Cheektowaga appeals from the affirmance of an injunction restraining the discharge of storm water from the town into the City of Buffalo. … Y. 236, 239 ; Conhocton Stone Road Co. v. Buffalo, N. Y. & Erie R. R. Co., 3 Hun 523 , 528; Brown v. Neely, 197 Misc. 173, 176-177 , affd. 277 App. Div. 1126 ).

    Cited 17 timesPublished
  • Claim of Jolley v. Ind-Venture Communications, Inc.

    11 N.Y.3d 769 · New York Court of Appeals · Sep 11, 2008

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • Rosen v. McNab

    25 N.Y.2d 798 · New York Court of Appeals · Jun 11, 1969

    Each received a receipt from the Board of Elections attesting to the number of sheets filed. … The board’s responsibility extends only to the examination of the particular petitions under consideration— and of course any other petitions before the board — for the purpose of ascertaining whether they were signed by

    Cited 21 timesPublished
  • People v. Fuller

    57 N.Y.2d 152 · New York Court of Appeals · Oct 19, 1982

    Brown, 32 Cal 3d 236). . … For example, it has established a Crime Victims Compensation Board to aid victims of crime (see Executive Law, §§ 620-635; Comment, Compensation for Victims of Crimes of Violence, 31 Alb L Rev 120). .

    Cited 229 timesPublished
  • Williams v. . Western Union Telegraph Co.

    93 N.Y. 162 · New York Court of Appeals · Oct 2, 1883

    Cas. 545; Minot v. Paine, 99 Mass. 101 ; Rand v. Hubbell, 115 id. 471; Brown v. Lehigh Coal & Nav. Co., 49 Penn. St. 270; Commonwealth v. Pittsburgh, Fort Wayne & Chicago R. Co., 74 id. 83; Terry v. … (Brown v. Monmouthshire R’y & C. Co., 4 Eng. L. & Eq. 118; Rex v. Bank of England, 2 Barn. & Ald. 620; Jackson’s Admr’s v. Newark Plankroad Co., 31 N. J. Law, 277; Ely v. Sprague, Clark’s Ch. 351.)

    Cited 89 timesPublished
  • Bull v. Stichman

    298 N.Y. 516 · New York Court of Appeals · Jun 11, 1948

    Cited 33 timesPublished
  • New York Statewide Coalition of Hispanic Chambers of Commerce v. New York City Department of Health & Mental Hygiene

    23 N.Y.3d 681 · New York Court of Appeals · Jun 26, 2014

    in Matter of Schulman v New York City Health & Hosps. … v Morris, 489 US 688 [1989] [declaring the voting system of the Board of Estimate unconstitutional]).

    Cited 32 timesPublished
  • People v. Tyler

    46 N.Y.2d 251 · New York Court of Appeals · Dec 20, 1978

    Where there is an "abuse of process”, that is, a "misuse or perversion of regularly issued legal process for a purpose not justified by the nature of the process”, a cause of action will lie (Board of Educ. v Farmingdale … Recognized is that it is not just the target of the abuse who is offended, but the administration of justice (see Board of Educ. v Farmingdale Classroom Teachers Assn., supra, pp 400-401).

    Cited 37 timesPublished

Ask Donna

Ask Donna

A word about cookies

We need a few to keep you signed in and the library working. The rest help us see which pages people use and where they get stuck. They stay off unless you say yes.