Case law

Sheehan v. Scaringe

60 N.Y.2d 795 · New York Court of Appeals · Oct 25, 1983

Barrett v. . John v. Schaefer, Jr., Company

218 N.Y. 732 · New York Court of Appeals · Jun 16, 1916

Claim of Papkoff v. Feldman

19 N.Y.2d 932 · New York Court of Appeals · May 23, 1967

Claim of Lippman v. Biennier Transportation Co.

10 N.Y.2d 757 · New York Court of Appeals · Jul 7, 1961

Berry v. Dodd

38 N.Y.2d 995 · New York Court of Appeals · Mar 30, 1976

In each case: Order affirmed, without costs (Matter of Sciarra v Donnelly, 34 NY2d 970 ; Matter of Chine v Hayduk, 34 NY2d 965 ). Concur: Chief Judge Breitel and Judges Gabrielli, Jones and Wachtler.

Calhoun v. . Millard

121 N.Y. 69 · New York Court of Appeals · Apr 15, 1890

(Heywood v. City of Buffalo, 14 N. Y. 540 ; Town of Venice v. Woodruff, 62 id. 462; Town of Springport v. Teutonia Savings Bank, 75 id. 397.) … (People ex rel. v. Brown, 55 N. Y. 180 ; First Nat. Bank v. Wheeler, 72 id. 201 .)

Claim of Girard v. St. Joseph Mineral Corp.

50 N.Y.2d 934 · New York Court of Appeals · Jun 24, 1980

Smith v. New York Central Railroad

4 Keyes 180 · New York Court of Appeals · Sep 15, 1868

(Downs v. Ross, 23 Wend. 270 .) In the case of Garbutt v. … And in Smith v.

People v. Globe Mutual Life Insurance

15 Abb. N. Cas. 75 · New York Court of Appeals · Oct 15, 1884

Brown, on January 23, 1865, procured from the Globe Mutual Life Insurance Company a ten years policy on his life for $10,000, loss payable to his wife, Mary M. Brown. … Brown, having made her claim under the paid-up policy, has thereby ratified the act of her husband in procuring it, and on the principles stated in Coyle v. City of Brooklyn, 53 Barb. 41 , 56 ; Baker v.

Kenyon v. Knights Templar & Masonic Mutual Aid Ass'n

122 N.Y. 247 · New York Court of Appeals · Oct 7, 1890

He had a license from the Hnited States government; also one from the board of excise of the city. The latter is commonly known as a store license. … (French v. Carhart, 1 N. Y. 96 : Field v. Munson, 47 id. 221 ; Bridaer v. Pierson, 45 id. 501.)

People v. Logan

25 N.Y.2d 184 · New York Court of Appeals · Jul 1, 1969

S. 293, 301-302 ; People v. Rivera, 22 N Y 2d 453; People v. Ballott, 20 N Y 2d 600; People v. Brown, 20 N Y 2d 238). … People v. Rivera, 22 N Y 2d 453, supra). Of course, in contrast to the events in the Ballott case the victim in the Brown case had been in the company of the thieves for several hours. *192 Recently, in Biggers v.

Claim of McCall v. Wayne Liquor Corp.

15 N.Y.2d 929 · New York Court of Appeals · Mar 18, 1965

People v. Hansen

38 N.Y.2d 17 · New York Court of Appeals · Oct 30, 1975

v Callandra, 414 US 338, 348 ; Brown v United States, 411 US 223, 227 ; Simmons v United States, 390 US 377, 389 ; Wong Sun v United States, 371 US 471, 492 ; Jones v United States, 362 US 257 ; cf. … decision in Jones *23 (Brown v United States, supra, pp 227-228).

Claim of McIntosh v. E. F. Hauserman Co.

10 N.Y.2d 892 · New York Court of Appeals · Nov 16, 1961

Order affirmed, with costs to respondent Workmen’s Compensation Board; no opinion. Concur: Chief Judge Desmond and Judges Dye, Fuld, Froessel, Van Voorhis, Burke and Foster.

Claim of Reynolds v. Masick

56 N.Y.2d 839 · New York Court of Appeals · Jun 8, 1982

(Matter of Anderson v Cohen Iron Works, 38 NY2d 511, 515 .) We adhere to that interpretation of the policy behind the Workers’ Compensation Law. … Since the board found on substantial evidence that the accident was caused by the operation of a defective vehicle, the Appellate Division correctly reversed the Workers’ Compensation Board and dismissed the claim.

Boardman v. . B'd of Sup'rs of Tompkins Co.

85 N.Y. 359 · New York Court of Appeals · May 31, 1881

The learned counsel for the respondent refers us to Williams v. Board of Supervisors ( 78 N. Y. 561 ); People v. Trustees of Ogdensburg (48 id. 397); Hoyt v. Commissioners of Taxes (23 id. 224 ); Catlin v. … Board of Supervisors related to an agent acting for a foreign principal, and the property in his hands was held to be exempt within the qualification of the act of 1851 before referred to. Hoyt v.

Matter of Muhammad F.

94 N.Y.2d 136 · New York Court of Appeals · Nov 30, 1999

In Michigan Dept. of State Police v Sitz, the Supreme Court stated that the balancing analysis of Brown v Texas and earlier precedents should be utilized in these “cases dealing with police stops of motorists on public highways … After reaffirming the applicability of Brown v Texas, the Court in Sitz recognized the magnitude of the governmental interest in combating drunken driving (Michigan Dept. of State Police v Sitz, supra, at 450-451; see also

Garcia v. New York City Dept. of Health & Mental Hygiene

31 N.Y.3d 601 · New York Court of Appeals · Jun 28, 2018

Berman, P.C. v City of New York , 25 NY3d 684, 690 [2015]; see DJL Rest. Corp. v City of New York , 96 NY2d 91, 95 [2001]). … Corp. v City of Utica , 6 NY3d 761 [2006]; Lanza v Wagner , 11 NY2d 317 [1962]).

Riley v. . Standard Oil Co.

231 N.Y. 301 · New York Court of Appeals · May 31, 1921

He ate his supper and then, for the purpose of calling upon a friend, drove a mile or two distant from his boarding place. … Brown ( 71 Me. 432 ); Fiske v. Enders ( 73 Conn. 338 ); Slater v. Advance Thresher Co. ( 97 Minn. 305 ); Sanderson v. Collins (1904, 1 King’s Bench, 628).

Tallman v. Atlantic Fire & Marine Insurance

33 How. Pr. 400 · New York Court of Appeals · Sep 15, 1867

appears to have acted as Brown’s agent in the matter, and asked him how much was then due to Brown. … He testified that, on the 30th of November, 1860, he was the sole owner of the property covered by said policy,v and continued such owner down to the time of such examination, to wit., May 27, 1863; that the property belonged