Case law

Claim of Anderson v. William Cohen Iron Works

38 N.Y.2d 511 · New York Court of Appeals · Jan 8, 1976

The violation of the hunting licensing statute in Matter of Bauer v 590 West End Co. ( 28 AD2d 1151 , supra) is one example. … (People v Joy, 50 Misc 2d 690, 692 .) Before obtaining a license, an applicant must pass certain tests related to driving skill (Vehicle and Traffic Law, § 502, subd 4.)

In the Matter of 9th & 10th Street LLC v. Board of Standards and Appeals of the City of New York

9 N.Y.3d 1018 · New York Court of Appeals · Jan 10, 2008

Claim of Schechter v. State Insurance Fund

18 N.Y.2d 767 · New York Court of Appeals · Oct 18, 1966

Claim of Marincel v. Goodyear Tire & Rubber Co.

40 N.Y.2d 1032 · New York Court of Appeals · Dec 20, 1976

Calhoun v. . Millard

121 N.Y. 69 · New York Court of Appeals · Apr 15, 1890

(Heywood v. City of Buffalo, 14 N. Y. 540 ; Town of Venice v. Woodruff, 62 id. 462; Town of Springport v. Teutonia Savings Bank, 75 id. 397.) … (People ex rel. v. Brown, 55 N. Y. 180 ; First Nat. Bank v. Wheeler, 72 id. 201 .)

Matter of Fed. Tel. & Radio Corp.(corsi)

301 N.Y. 95 · New York Court of Appeals · May 25, 1950

Brown of counsel), for respondent. LOUGHRAN, Ch. J., LEWIS, CONWAY, DESMOND and FULD, JJ., concur with FROESSEL, J.; DYE, J., dissents in opinion. *97 FROESSEL, J. … Corp. v. United States , 307 U. S. 125 ).

Ellwood v. . Northrup

106 N.Y. 172 · New York Court of Appeals · Jun 7, 1887

(Rogers v. Dill, 6 Hill, 415 ; Forman v. Marsh, 11 N. Y. 544, 551; Baker v. Lorillard , 4 id. 257 .) … (Stilwell v. Swarthout, 81 N. Y. 109 ; Rea v. McEachron, 13 Wend. 465 .)

Claim of Howard v. Stature Electric, Inc.

15 N.Y.3d 906 · New York Court of Appeals · Nov 18, 2010

Claim of Paider v. Park East Movers

19 N.Y.2d 373 · New York Court of Appeals · Apr 13, 1967

Matter of Goldberg v. 954 Marcy Corp. ( 276 N. … The Appellate Division, two Justices dissenting (26 A D 2d 752), affirmed a finding by the Workmen’s Compensation Board that this was an occupational disease.

Claim of Kalevas v. J. H. Williams & Co.

20 N.Y.2d 812 · New York Court of Appeals · Oct 24, 1967

Order affirmed, with costs to respondent Workmen's Compensation Board; no opinion. Concur: Chief Judge Fuld and Judges Burke, Scileppi, Bergan, Keating and Breitel. … Judge Van Voorhis dissents and votes to reverse and to dismiss the claim upon the authority of Matter of Jordan v. Decorative Co. ( 230 N. Y. 522 ).

Kenyon v. Knights Templar & Masonic Mutual Aid Ass'n

122 N.Y. 247 · New York Court of Appeals · Oct 7, 1890

He had a license from the Hnited States government; also one from the board of excise of the city. The latter is commonly known as a store license. … (French v. Carhart, 1 N. Y. 96 : Field v. Munson, 47 id. 221 ; Bridaer v. Pierson, 45 id. 501.)

Claim of Ernest v. Boggs Lake Estates, Inc.

12 N.Y.2d 414 · New York Court of Appeals · May 2, 1963

National Cabinet Co., 8 N Y 2d 277, 284, 285; Sentilles v. Inter-Caribbean Shipping Corp., 361 U. S. 107; Burke v. Nelson Mfg. Co., 219 Minn. 381, 386 ; Gaffney v. Industrial Acc. … . *417 The order should be affirmed, with costs to respondent Workmen’s Compensation Board. Judges Dye, Fuld, Van Voorhis, Burke, Foster and Scileppi concur. Order affirmed.

Claim of Lippman v. Biennier Transportation Co.

10 N.Y.2d 757 · New York Court of Appeals · Jul 7, 1961

Butler v. Hayduk

37 N.Y.2d 497 · New York Court of Appeals · Sep 4, 1975

The rule has not been changed by the holding in *499 Matter of Lamula v Power ( 13 NY2d 873 ). … , thé objectors were properly before the court” (Matter of Lamula v Power, supra, at p 874).

Baldwin Union Free School District v. County of Nassau

22 N.Y.3d 606 · New York Court of Appeals · Feb 18, 2014

Assn. v Town of Guilderland, 74 NY2d 372, 376 [1989]; see Matter of Cohen v Board of Appeals of Vil. of Saddle Rock, 100 NY2d 395, 399-401 [2003]). … Instead, the very purpose and effect of an amendment is to amend the relevant portion of the Constitution, effectively repealing and voiding any prior version of the particular section so amended (see Browne v City of New

Sheehan v. Scaringe

60 N.Y.2d 795 · New York Court of Appeals · Oct 25, 1983

Berry v. Dodd

38 N.Y.2d 995 · New York Court of Appeals · Mar 30, 1976

In each case: Order affirmed, without costs (Matter of Sciarra v Donnelly, 34 NY2d 970 ; Matter of Chine v Hayduk, 34 NY2d 965 ). Concur: Chief Judge Breitel and Judges Gabrielli, Jones and Wachtler.

People v. Globe Mutual Life Insurance

15 Abb. N. Cas. 75 · New York Court of Appeals · Oct 15, 1884

Brown, on January 23, 1865, procured from the Globe Mutual Life Insurance Company a ten years policy on his life for $10,000, loss payable to his wife, Mary M. Brown. … Brown, having made her claim under the paid-up policy, has thereby ratified the act of her husband in procuring it, and on the principles stated in Coyle v. City of Brooklyn, 53 Barb. 41 , 56 ; Baker v.

Matter of Muhammad F.

94 N.Y.2d 136 · New York Court of Appeals · Nov 30, 1999

In Michigan Dept. of State Police v Sitz, the Supreme Court stated that the balancing analysis of Brown v Texas and earlier precedents should be utilized in these “cases dealing with police stops of motorists on public highways … After reaffirming the applicability of Brown v Texas, the Court in Sitz recognized the magnitude of the governmental interest in combating drunken driving (Michigan Dept. of State Police v Sitz, supra, at 450-451; see also

Von Maack v. Wyckoff Heights Medical Center

29 N.Y.3d 965 · New York Court of Appeals · Apr 4, 2017