Case law

Long Island University v. Tappan

306 N.Y. 570 · New York Court of Appeals · Oct 16, 1953

Claim of D'Angelo v. Loft Candy Corp.

28 N.Y.2d 573 · New York Court of Appeals · Jan 21, 1971

Claim of Schwenger v. NYU School of Medicine

26 N.Y.3d 962 · New York Court of Appeals · Sep 22, 2015

People v. Hernandez

93 N.Y.2d 261 · New York Court of Appeals · May 6, 1999

Thus, SORA itself could be interpreted as forging a divide in procedural treatment between defendants who will be incarcerated and those who will not (see, People v Brown, 174 Misc 2d 941, 943 [Sup Ct, Bronx County 1997] … [“in a nonincarceratory sentence, there is little need for the Board’s recommendation”]; Doe v Pataki, 120 F3d 1263, 1268 [2d Cir 1997], cert denied 522 US 1122 [“For all sex offenders sentenced or released from a state correctional

Claim of Ling Chen v. Reuters America Holdings, Inc.

26 N.Y.3d 1080 · New York Court of Appeals · Dec 17, 2015

The Matter of Jorge L. Linares v. Andrea W. Evans

26 N.Y.3d 1012 · New York Court of Appeals · Oct 22, 2015

Petitioner challenges the validity and potential application of certain regulations of the Board of Parole which address risks and needs assessments and related matters (see 9 NYCRR 8002.3 [a]). … (see Walton v New York State Dept of Correctional Servs, 8 NY3d 186, 197 [2007]; Schiavone v City of New York, 92 NY2d 308, 317 [1998]; see also Red Hook/Gowanus Chamber of Commerce v New York City Bd of Stds, 5 NY3d 452

Claim of Yujuan Sheng v. Time Warner Cable, Inc.

26 N.Y.3d 1060 · New York Court of Appeals · Nov 24, 2015

People v. Taylor

73 N.Y.2d 683 · New York Court of Appeals · Jun 8, 1989

As we have previously recognized, substantial — rather than literal — compliance may satisfy the written application requirements (People v Brown, 40 NY2d 183, 186-188 ; People v *689 Sullivan, 56 NY2d 378 ; cf., People v … The majority rely on People v Brown ( 40 NY2d 183 ) and contend that the present facts do not meet the standards of substantial compliance outlined in that case.

Mengele v. Liebmann Breweries, Inc.

11 N.Y.2d 986 · New York Court of Appeals · May 17, 1962

Diamond v. Specter

32 N.Y.2d 811 · New York Court of Appeals · May 4, 1973

Claim of Yarleque v. Sally Lou, Inc.

15 N.Y.3d 770 · New York Court of Appeals · Jul 1, 2010

Claim of Lagona v. Starpoint Central School

40 N.Y.2d 1034 · New York Court of Appeals · Dec 22, 1976

Elwell v. . Skiddy

77 N.Y. 282 · New York Court of Appeals · May 20, 1879

Brown Brothers & Co. or to his or their assigns, he, or they paying freight as per charter party. … (Westlake v. De Graw, 25 Wend., 669 ; Whitbeck v. Skinner, 7 Hill, 53 ; Batterman v. Pierce, 3 id., 173; Rowley v. Woodruff, 2 Lans., 419 ; Ogden v. Coddington, 9 E. D. Smith, 317; Hinsdell v.

Dorosz v. Green & Seifter

92 N.Y.2d 672 · New York Court of Appeals · Feb 16, 1999

Claimant, citing Matter of McGee v Allstate Ins. … Co. ( 41 AD2d 866 ), Matter of Cellura v Hall & Co. ( 36 AD2d 868 ) and Matter of Dunn v Supervised Investors Servs. ( 34 AD2d 1067 ), contends that the claim is cognizable because decedent’s activities conferred a benefit

In re the Board of Commissioners

7 N.Y. 131 · New York Court of Appeals · Feb 4, 1873

(Climar v. Cooke, 1 Sch. & Lef., 22; Riley v. City of Brooklyn, 46 N. Y., 444 .) … (Moir v. Brown, 14 Barb, 39.) Neither is there any particular mode of reference to a paper, whether annexed or not, essential to make it a part of the chief or principal instrument.

People v. Jones

47 N.Y.2d 409 · New York Court of Appeals · Jun 14, 1979

v Savvides, 1 NY2d 554 ). … Bennett v Rundle, 419 F2d 599; United States v Kobli, 172 F2d 919).

Mott v. . Palmer

1 N.Y. 564 · New York Court of Appeals · Dec 5, 1848

The facts were, that the fence was erected on Mott's land in 1840 by one Brown, (who owned the adjoining land,) under an agreement between him and Mott, by which Brown was to fence in, temporarily, a part of Mott's land with … Buildings and fixtures erected by a tenant for the purposes of trade belong to him, and are removable without the consent of his landlord. ( Holmes v. Tremper, 20 John . 30; Miller v. Plumb, 6 Cowen, 665; Doty v.

Reilly v. . Connable

214 N.Y. 586 · New York Court of Appeals · Apr 20, 1915

He ate his supper and then drove, for the purpose of calling upon a friend, a mile or two distant from his boarding place. At the time of the accident he had finished his call and was on his way to the hotel. … Collins ([1904] 1 King’s Bench, 628); Doran v. Thomsen (76 N. J. L. 764); Way v. Powers (57 Vt. 135); Maddox v. Brown ( 71 Me. 432 ); Fiske v. Enders ( 73 Conn. 338 ); Jones v. Hoge ( 47 Wash. 663 ); Sweeden r.

MATTER OF BARSKY v. Bd. of Regents

305 N.Y. 89 · New York Court of Appeals · Feb 26, 1953

Barsky, Appellant, v. Board of Regents of the University of the State of New York, Respondent. In the Matter of Jacob Auslander, Appellant, v. Board of Regents of the University of the State of New York, Respondent. … Marks v. Brophy ( 293 N.Y. 469 ); Matter of Tonis v. Board of Regents ( 295 N.Y. 286 ), and Matter of Garsson v.

MATTER OF TAYLOR v. New York City Bd. of Elections

100 N.Y.2d 555 · New York Court of Appeals · Jun 12, 2003